rahul
27 March 2017 at 18:29
By “the constitution (scheduled tribes) order amendment act”, the Hindi meaning of a scheduled tribes had been changed.(consequently issuance of ST Cast Certificate to this caste had been closed and this cast had been put under obc list) Recently this constitution (scheduled tribes) order amendment act had been repealed by the central government .on this repealing , different opinion has been arisen on the hindi meaning of this scheduled tribes between central government and state government . state government ‘s view point is, since the amending order has been repealed consequently the situation before amendment is restored and ordered to its officials vide its official gazette to issue ST certificate in state and central format to caste listed before amendment.
Whereas the central government is of opinion that no changes have been made by repealing of the said amendment by virtue of saving clause of the repealing Act ,which is as under.
“The repeal by this Act of any enactment shall not affect any other enactment in which the repealed enactment has been applied, incorporated or referred to-----“
Sir on the basis of above facts my question is:-
1)What is the status of beneficiary of this ST certificate in the eye of law who applied cast certificate on the basis of state government order and gets benefit of this ST certificate?, if he is not aware about different opinion on the hindi meaning of this scheduled tribes between central government and state government at the time of taking benefit of this certificate.
Nagaraju
23 March 2017 at 21:59
Dear expert
Need to know procedure for appointing tribunal members who participate in disposals of revenue disputes chaired by Ac or thahasildar
Arvind
20 March 2017 at 15:11
Sir
I am given to understand that any person following the Sikh religion can carry a kirpan or sword as per their religious beliefs.
However when a sikh by birth cuts his hair short then can he or she carry a kirpan or sword as per law.
Please clarify.
Arvind
salamat
12 March 2017 at 11:31
Dear All,
Thanks for your continuous support. My query is .. is there any provision in law or power to court about re election if a pil is filed representing voters whose name where deleted without information and without proper reason if yes hiw many such voters should be there to do so.
Madhu Mittal
10 March 2017 at 15:40
As per Income tax section 55 2 iiia cost of bonus shares is to be taken nil w.e.f 01.04.1996.
Now finance act 2017, Further, for assets purchased before 1st April 2001, the cost of acquisition is either the fair market value of the asset as on 1st April 2001 or the actual cost, at the option of the Assessee.
So now from 01.04.2017 if bonus shares is allotted in 1999, the cost of acquisition can be taken fair market value of the asset as on 1st April 2001.
If Yes and my understanding is correct, whether it is constitutional that bonus shares are treated differently as far as cost of acquisition is related.
Kalpesh suryawanshi
08 March 2017 at 16:02
Dear Members the recent decision of suprem court 15 dec 2016 stated that all liquire serving and selling outlets should be closed which come in the radius of 500 meter of state / national highway ....does this order includes the roads running inside out the city and if yes are there any remedied or chances to be saved by this decision also what option does the government have to turn the table around also the honurable court has issued the order under article 142 ....what does it mean kindly clarify
Mathre Rangarajan
07 March 2017 at 19:39
Dear Sirs,
I draw your kind attention to Supreme Court 5 judge constitutional bench judgment in 1982 in D S Nakra & others Vs Union of India - copy attached
1. Highlight of this judgment is that "all retirees are one class under Article 14, 15 and 21 of Constitution, they cannot be divided based on date of joining and date of retirement and any new benefit given at a later date should be extended to all previous retirees to maintain integrity.
2. Is this constitutional provision is applicable to retirees of Central Public Sector Enterprises also as they are also Central Government employees (Quasi Govt)?
3. Department of Public Enterprises, Government of India, vide their letter No W-0001/2017-DPE(WC) dated 9th February 2017 (copy attached) says that retirees of Central Public Sector Enterprises are divided into distinct two groups based on their retirement (01-01-2007) - First group people who are going to retire after 01-01-2007 gets pension and post retirement medical benefits and second group people retired before 01-01-2007 will not get that benefit.
4. Is this not breach of 1982 judgement of Supreme Court?
5. Can I file a Contempt of Supreme Court case to get justice?
warm regarads
M Rangarajan
retired group general manager (ONGC)
B 2-301, Sriram Spandhana,
Challaghatta,
Bangalore -5600037
mobile: 9945091581
email: rangajan1@gmail.com
Ranbir
28 February 2017 at 21:26
Dear sir,
I would like to bring your attention to a fact that recently I had applied for education loan to a PSU bank and got approval regarding same know similarly I went to another bank and applied for car loan they asked for documents to me I provided all my documents regarding same and even several meeting was held with the banking officer regarding sanction of loan the officer postponed the matter from one day to another which nearly took 20 to 30 days I got frustrated by the harassment and asked reasons for such delay and the officer declined my loan stating that my cibil score is very poor I immediately complained to the manager of the bank who stated nothing can be done. now sir when one bank has granted education loan to me of rs 380000 but another bank declines loan on cibil score what should be done sir when I never had loan or any credit card is it legal to use civil as a reason to decline loan without knowing the facts
Vikash Kumar Bairagi
25 February 2017 at 19:30
Any Idea about the Financial Emergency Article 360, How it can be imposed on what grounds, In whole part of India or any parts means two or more states simultaneously
and Any reference book for the same.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Maharashtra land revenue act
SIR I AM HAVING APPROX.600SQ MTR OF LAND ALONG WITH 2 STORYIED STRUCTURE WHICH IS ANCESTRAL PROPERTY.SITUATED IN MUMBAI WESTERN SUBURB.I AM PAYING N.A. TAX FOR THE SAME SINCE LAST MORE THAN 35 YEARS. NOW SUDDENLY FROM TAHASILDAR OFFICE THEY ARE SAYING SINCE IN OUR RECORD IT IS SHOWING AS A RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY BUT WE HAVE NOTICED THAT THIS IS COMMERCIAL PROPERTY SO YOU WILL HAVE TO PAY ITS COMMERCIAL RATE SINCE BACKDATED.I HAVE RECEIVED THIS LAND FROM MY LATE FATHER AND IT IS SINCE BEGINING COMMERCIAL PROPERTY. IF GOVT.OFFICE IS HAVING WRONG RECORD.WHAT CAN I DO.IN THIS CASE. CLEARK FROM THAT OFFICE IS SAYING I WILL HAVE TO PAY HEAVY PENALTY ALONG WITH 30 YEARS ARREARS OF TAX IS IT TRUE. CAN SOMEBODY ADVICE PLEASE.I WILL BE GREATFUL.