Gulshan Tanwar
18 August 2011 at 10:36
What are consequences of the recently introduced Lokpal Bill 2011?
Kindly enlighten on the subject as the matter is worsening our system especially the constitution because Brahma, Vishnu & Mahesh will be in one God which cannot exist.
1. Group A services as well as Group B services as in West Bengal Police is in Group B.
2. To include Government servants who are not covered into the definitions of public servant.
3. Jurisdiction of Lokpal.
4. Final Authority to be Supreme Court.
Anonymous
17 August 2011 at 19:41
right to protest under which artilce of indian consitution
Right to strike under which article of indian Constitution.
Above mentioned are not fundamental right.
Thanks
Anonymous
13 August 2011 at 16:47
Can anyone guide as to the manner in which a Mentally Challenged adult person could apply for an Indian Passport - whether his Parents could apply for the same or any other method is there. There is absolutely no guidance available in the Website of Passport Authorities/Government of India's concerned Ministry. If anyone has clear knowledge on this issue, kindly enlighten on the same in details, such as Affidavits,documents,etc. required and the manner & method of submission of the application,etc. THANKS IN ADVANCE.
Sumir
12 August 2011 at 19:57
If any conflict arise between state law and central law, both going against each other, then which shall be followed, why?
Anonymous
12 August 2011 at 11:36
Sir,
Under an RTI application I asked about the reasons of termination of a contract employee by a central ministry.
But they denied to provide that this does not comes under that category of information, i.e. to provide reasons to citizens about something has been done or something has not been done, why or reasons.
In this manner are govt. authorities are free to do anything as per there wish and hide whole thing under this ? If not then what could be the way to get the reason for termination.
Thanks & Regards.
ar
Anonymous
12 August 2011 at 11:26
Sir,
I did an email on 14-2-2011 to official id of a cm i.e. cmup@nic.in.I asked about action happened on that email under RTI Act.When I moved to office, earlier, officer was showing me that you did this email to cm and misbehaving with, me prior to put RTI.
After that when I put RTI to cm office, in reply of RTI, cm office had denied about the receive of email.They clearly saying we did not receive this mail.
Please suggest me what should be my next step ? How can I prove about the email, as a technical person i know if email is not properly delivered then sender receive a bounce message stating reason about not delivering. But how can it be proved in court or in state or central information commission ?
Thanks & Regards.
ar
Anonymous
12 August 2011 at 07:32
dear sir,
in my case for possession of property against my brother who has encroached on my property the issues have been framed.
i am told by my lawyer that no fresh documents cannot be permitted to be filed unless permission of the court.
he states that fresh documents can be filed during witnesses cross examnation.
kindly enlighten.
query 2.if a signature or handwriting on a
document is denied what recource does the court take for alternate proofs.
is it handwriting expert opinion or circumstancial evidence?
does a court have an empannelled handwriting experts and if so what is the aftermath of the handwriting expert opinion.
can it be questioned and if so what option does the court normmally take
thanks
vinay kala aug 12,11
SURAJ
11 August 2011 at 14:54
hello sir, i want to do l.l.b but now i m final year student of commerce(mumbai) i just want to know that what kind of preparation i should do please suggest me if any course relating to l.l.b
Hariom Tiwari
10 August 2011 at 21:33
The applicant filed a P.A. Case which was dismissed against which appeal was filed which was allowed by the appellate court against which tenant filed a writ under Art.226which has been dissmissed by single bench of High Court Allahabad now whatis the remady for tenant petitioner
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Transfer of proceeding from one bech of high court to another on its own.
Under what circumstances a Judge of high court can nominate a particular case after hearing for more than 7 times in his court can place it before the Chief justice for another bench.
Non of the parties had objected.
The transfer will certainly effect both the parties as one party will stand fully gained while the other party will be carried away by miscarriage of justice as the STAY order obtained earlier on the ground stands finaly settled by the present bench three years back by the present judge.
What is the effective remedy for me to challenge this issue before the honble Supreme Court ? will I get any proper relief?
Can an representation before the present Judge or before the Chief Justice will be proper and effective.
If the writ petition is heard by the present Judge its lawfully it stands decided in the favour of one party.
Pl suggest quick and effective remedy. As early as possible