amit
31 July 2012 at 13:21
Sir,
I am serving army officer and is interested in the above exam which govt have held for state police officer,cpos and armed force officer with 35 yrs of age.
As a background the following are fact-
1. As per Army rule,a permanent commission officer can only be eligible if he supersedes.Selection Board take place in 15 yr of service.EVEN IF COMMISSIONING AGE is 20 yrs as in case of Ex NDA.offrs.they will be eligible only at age of 35 yrs.
2. In case of short service officer,he can apply for civil employment at the last 6 months of final yr of his agreement.Now SSC is for 10 yrs.Average age is 24 yrs when SSC offr get selected and 25 at time of commission.In this case also he is not able to write exam as he is turning 35 yrs.
IN BOTH CASES OPPORTUNITY IS BEING DENIED TO ARMY OFFICERS EVEN THEY ARE ALLOWED TO WRITE EXAM BY GOVT BECAUSE OF AGE.
SECOND issue ,
is pertaing to cut off bench mark of age which as per Ministry of home affair rule is 1 aug.
The CPO offrs age is considered on aug bench mark during initial recruitment before writing departmental exam for IPS.
Howeever army recruitment is held twice in yr with jan and july as benchmark.Person selected in Jan written and ssb subsequently join academy for training in month of september that year and person selected in july exam in month of april next year.
My querry is
1. Can a case be taken up for relaxation of age for subject exam to 36 yrs from 35 yrs keeping the service condition of army officers.
2. If not,atleast a case can be taken up to MHA to reduce benchmark from 01 aug of that year to 01 jan of year,so as to enable officers of army to write exam at least one.
At least they should not be denied the right of equal opportunity viz a viz officerrs of CPO as the part OF MHA and following aug bench mark and army lossing being on differnt rule and using jan as bench mark.
PLEASE SOLICIT ADVISE AND RIGHT COURSE OF ACTION.
brijesh sharma
25 July 2012 at 14:34
Please tell me any body from India, What can assume an Indian as a normal man from Hon’ble President’s Office, Prime Minister’s Office, Lower Parliament (Loksabha), Upper Parliament (Rajyasabha) and etc. A normal man is suffering from corruption, harassment, favoritism, nepotism. Implementation of every law, rule, and order is far away from its destination. Any type of report and data can be prepared. Recently Rs. 37 lakh rupees were spent on the renovation of two toilet of the planning commission, who submit its affidavit in Hon’ble Supreme Court of India “that if a normal man has about Rs. 28/- in his pocket, he is not poor? Hon’ble President’s Office, Prime Minister’s Office has opened a Online Helpline Portal for the people of India. Unfortunately service matters remain away from these portals. I take help these portals regarding my 20 years harassment of service life. Unfortunately after the about two years of time my grievances again reached to the same officers from them I was affected. They again replied against the rules framed by the Hon’ble Prime Minister’s Office (DOPT). Please tell how these Institutions can help a normal man? How a normal man can believe on these Institutions? Procedure of Hon’nble Court (lower court to High Court, High court to Hon’ble Supreme Court) is too much expensive and uncertain and also takes several decades. RTI act 2005 has also lost its credibility as government was trying. Every department having a sign board having instruction “Corruption Free Office, if you have any complaint asks the competent officer or complaint CVC Delhi”. There is no any fees limit for lawyers. Can any body tell the address and directory of affordable lawyers in Delhi and capital of States for relevant High courts? I am unable to understand this fact that, how corruption is so cheap then honesty and hard work”? Please clarify seriously. I have also request to all officers related with these Institutions. I have no any intention to complaint any body. I am submitting my any unconditional apology for the same. But I am asking for the betterment of the system, because our Hon’ble former President and newly appointed President have hint their doubt on the corruption. Please reply all of you.
SARAVANAN.R
23 July 2012 at 23:33
Respected Sir,
On verifying several papers on the internet, I find that in Golak Nath case, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India ruled that the Fundamental Rights guaranteed by the Constitution cannot be amended by Parliament.
In Kesavanand Bharti case, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India ruled that Fundamental Rights can be amended, but the basic structure of the Constitution cannot be taken away by the Parliament.
In the Minerva Mills Ltd case also, the above
decision was confirmed.
Kindly correct me if I am wrong on the above
I will be thankful, if you take pain in explaining the back ground of the above cases and how it is relevant today.
Also I have read that the decision in Kesavanand Bharti case nullified the decision of Golak nath case.
Whether the above ruling has anything to do with amendment in 1976.
Please correct me if I am wrong on the above.
Saravanan
steve
23 July 2012 at 12:04
Sir, I am a government employee. I had received an official letter consisting two pages from individual concerned which is computer typed and it has been signed with date of 12th February'2012. On that said letter three lines are handwritten and again a signature has been put just below the handwritten lines but this signature is without any date. I have processed the letter in file in a routine matter. Now my department has issued me a memo alleging that I have met the individual concerned on 13th Feb'2012 and dictated/instructed him the lines which have been handwritten. But genuinely speaking this is false allegation. I never did so.
I need expert legal opinion with regard to the rules that if a letter has been signed on 12th Feb'2012 it cannot be said to have been amended by hand on 13th Feb'2012. If it is amended on 13th Feb'2012 the date of signature should be 13th Feb'2012. Pl help me coz i need justice. I am very much tensed as i did not even dream of such type of allegations against me.
steve
22 July 2012 at 17:17
Sir, I am a government employee. I had received an official letter consisting two pages from individual concerned which is computer typed and it has been signed with date of 12th February'2012. On that said letter three lines are handwritten and again a signature has been put just below the handwritten lines but this signature is without any date. I have processed the letter in file in a routine matter. Now my department has issued me a memo alleging that I have met the individual concerned on 13th Feb'2012 and dictated/instructed him the lines which have been handwritten. But genuinely speaking this is false allegation. I never did so.
I need expert legal opinion with regard to the rules that if a letter has been signed on 12th Feb'2012 it cannot be said to have been amended by hand on 13th Feb'2012. If it is amended on 13th Feb'2012 the date of signature should be 13th Feb'2012. Pl help me coz i need justice. I am very much tensed as i did not even dream of such type of allegations against me.
sweety f
21 July 2012 at 22:01
HELLO!
THERE IS NO CONCRETE EVIDENCE AGAINST THE POLICE OFFICIAL TO PROVE THE ALLEGATIONS. HOWEVER I CAN PRODUCE THE HOTEL BILLS, ATM TRANSACTIONS, AUTO FARE ETC PAID BY ME EVEN THOUGH THE ACCUSE WAS IN POLICE CUSTODY.
TO WHOM SHOULD WE COMPLAIN WHEN A POLICE OFFICER REGISTERS A FALSE COMPLAINT AGAINST A COMMON man u/ sec 307/354 of ipc TO SEEK REVENGE FOR COMPLAINING AGAINST THEIR COLLEAGUES and for informing the higher authorities about the unsocial activities being going on undetected in the area.
THEY EVEN THREATENED THE COMPLAINANT THAT HE/SHE WOULD BE ARRESTED IF THE FIR IS NOT SIGNED.
THIRDLY, THE LADY WAS ILLITERATE N DID NOT KNEW THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE CASE.
THE LADIES DAUGHTER, SON WAS ALSO THREATENED WHEN THEY SAID THAT THEY DO NOT WANT TO REGISTER N FIR WHEN IT WAS A DOMESTIC ISSUE.
THE POLICE TOOK MONEY FORM THE COMPLAINANT AND THE ACCUSE TO HAND OVER THE FIR COPIES N TO GIVE A NOC IN THE COURT AFTER THE CASE WAS WITHDRAWAL.
****NB** HOW EASY N SAFE IT IS TO COMPLAIN AGAINST THE POLICE. 2] CAN WE SEEK PROTECTION N FROM WHERE N WHOM. 3] ARE THERE ANY CHANCES THAT THE COPS MIGHT COME UP WITH ANOTHER FALSE CASE AND ARREST THE COMPLAINANT AS WELL AS THE ACCUSE. 4] IS THERE ANY PROCEDURE WHERE WE CAN GET IMMUNITY THAT THE COPS WILL NOT FILE FALSE CASE AGAINST THE COMMON MAN. 5] THE COPS, HIS ASSISTANT, WRITER N THE FLY MEMBERS HAD FEASTED IN A RESTAURANT TO ALLOW THE ACCUSE TO HAVE FOOD, SHAVE N CHANGE CLOTHES IN A RESTAURANT. THEY HAD TAKEN 25K TO MAKE THE CASE WEAK. 6] HOW TO GET JUSTICE N WHAT STEPS SHOULD BE TAKEN WHILE FILING A COMPLAINT AGAINST THE COPS.
REGARDS
easari srinivasa rao
21 July 2012 at 18:27
Kindly refer to my query below.
Sir,
I would like know why the GoI Rules and Orders shall be published in the Gazette of India. If any rule or order might have not been published in the Gazette, would it not get legal validity.
What is the difference between the rules and orders that had published in the Gazette of India and not published in the gazette. What law says in this regard.
Kindly refer to my query that had replied by you which had given below for you refernce. IN this regard the GoI notified rules are hereby attached for you examination and after go through, my request below may be replied once again.
Thanking you sir,
Sir,
I want to know that the New contributory Pension Scheme had been introduced w.e.f. 1-1-2004 with an issuance of Ordinance by President of India and the same is valid for six months only. No legislation had been made by the Parliament. Then what is the legal validity of that scheme? Can we challenge the legal validity of the new pension scheme in the court of law for application of old pension scheme to the employees who recruited from 1-1-2004 to date. If, yes. In which court we can challenge? CAT/High Court/Supreme Court. Kindly give a suggestion including the relevant apex court judgments, if any.
Thanking you sir,
Srinivasa rao
9700816574
Expert : PS Dhingra, dcgroup1962@gmail.
PRO CHAT CALL
Posted about 18 hours ago
I don't think the Government is so forgetful that it cannot get the ordinance replaced through passage of a bill by the Parliament. If you are so sure you can definitely challenge the same in the SC. But better seek the information through RTI before you take such an action.
sweety f
21 July 2012 at 14:26
HELLO!
TO WHOM SHOULD WE COMPLAIN WHEN A POLICE OFFICER REGISTERS A FALSE COMPLAINT AGAINST A COMMON TO SEEK REVENGE FOR COMPLAINING AGAINST THEIR COLLEAGUES.
THEY EVEN THREATENED THE COMPLAINANT THAT HE/SHE WOULD BE ARRESTED IF THE FIR IS NOT SIGNED.
THIRDLY, THE LADY WAS ILLITERATE N DID NOT KNEW THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE CASE.
THE LADIES DAUGHTER, SON WAS ALSO THREATENED WHEN THEY SAID THAT THEY DO NOT WANT TO REGISTER N FIR WHEN IT WAS A DOMESTIC ISSUE.
THE POLICE TOOK MONEY FORM THE COMPLAINANT AND THE ACCUSE TO HAND OVER THE FIR COPIES N TO GIVE A NOC IN THE COURT AFTER THE CASE WAS WITHDRAWAL.
****NB** HOW EASY N SAFE IT IS TO COMPLAIN AGAINST THE POLICE. 2] CAN WE SEEK PROTECTION N FROM WHERE N WHOM. 3] ARE THERE ANY CHANCES THAT THE COPS MIGHT COME UP WITH ANOTHER FALSE CASE AND ARREST THE COMPLAINANT AS WELL AS THE ACCUSE. 4] IS THERE ANY PROCEDURE WHERE WE CAN GET IMMUNITY THAT THE COPS WILL NOT FILE FALSE CASE AGAINST THE COMMON MAN. 5] THE COPS, HIS ASSISTANT, WRITER N THE FLY MEMBERS HAD FEASTED IN A RESTAURANT TO ALLOW THE ACCUSE TO HAVE FOOD, SHAVE N CHANGE CLOTHES IN A RESTAURANT. THEY HAD TAKEN 25K TO MAKE THE CASE WEAK. 6] HOW TO GET JUSTICE N WHAT STEPS SHOULD BE TAKEN WHILE FILING A COMPLAINT AGAINST THE COPS.
*****PLS ADVISE IN SIMPLE LANGUAGE***
REGARDS
***PLS ADVICE IN A LAY MAN LANGUAGE
amit
21 July 2012 at 07:37
Dear Sir,
I have Filled a RTI in DVVNL (Electric)in UP
08 June 2012 -
RTI Filed By me
18 June 2012 -
Reply Received from DVVNL that the said RTI is not Concerned with our Deptt. and the same has been forwarded to the other deptt.
My Query is
Q. When will the First appeal be filled & to whom it will be filed ?
Q. Should i File the same to the DVVNL deptt to whom the RTI was filed ?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
House tax
DEAR SIR,
WHAT IS THE REMEDY AGAINST THE ORDER BY ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER UNDER SECTION 138(2) OF PUNJAB MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ACT 1976. DETAILS AS FOLLOWS:
PAYMENT OF BILL WITH REBATE AS ON 8.6.2012
PAYMENT OF BILL WITHOUT REBATE ON 03.07.2012
NOTICE U/S 137 ON 19.07.2012
ORDER U/S 138(2) ON 24.07.2012