Kalpesh suryawanshi
08 August 2012 at 13:50
I am having a saving account in a bank and i had complained about the bank to RBI ,The bank had no telephonic contact information of me but then also they contacted me via my mobile number ,All i need to ask it a Violation of privacy of an individual..
prem
06 August 2012 at 14:56
Can the Ex-president of India contest the election for lok sabha?
If no, why
Do we have any clause for this.
Milap Choraria
05 August 2012 at 12:29
On 2nd March, 2012, when I was in Delhi, a false case was lodged in Howrah P. S. (Howrah-WB)Police that I have snatched Rs.1,200/- Cash and some Documents from the pocket of the father of my daughter-in-law (under various litigation), to ensure my elimination by ensuring my presence in Kolkata, because I am also fighting against one Most Powerful White Color Criminal, who is also responsible for severe attempt to murder of me and subsequent attempt to murder my son through staged Truck Accident.
Throght an representations I supplied details of Data of my Mobile use of 2nd March, 2012 received from my Mobile Service Provider : Airtel, although they refused to supply Voice Data Records and Location of my Mobile on 2nd March, 2012, as such I requested the West Bengal Police to collect the same from Airtel. But they under Political influence filed Charge Sheet in aforesaid false case, and I am feeling serious threats to my life thus I filed an Transfer Petition in the Supreme Court aginst a Defamtion Suit filed by the said one Most Powerful White Color Criminal, before Calcutta High Court and Hon'ble Supreme Court stayed further proceedings in an interim Order issuing notices.
Therefore, can I file an Application before Delhi High Court under Article 226(2)of the Constitution against aforesaid Charge Sheet besides I also want to make Airtel, TRAI and Communication Ministry as the other respondents, because they failed to redress my request that I am fully entitled to collect my Voice Data Records and Location of my Mobile to defend filing of false criminal case, whihc no way damage privacy of any individual nor it concerned to security matters.
shankar
04 August 2012 at 11:15
Respected sir....
is there any necessity to held the AIBE examination for the newly enrolled law students ...? if yes..why did they have pay the fee for their hole examination in 5 years as well as 3 years LLB .....? does it make any sense ..... is their any similar examination to other professional course like MMBS,ENGINEERING...? why the ALL INDIA BAR COUNSEL doesn't held this exam before joining the LLB students ...!?
Sadanand B. Panchal
03 August 2012 at 18:51
Dear Experts,
There is development going on at the plot where I am residing by one X builder since last 4 years. The development is the construction of the new building in lieu of the old building of the Co-operative Housing society Y. In the year 2008 the said developer had obtained a tree cutting permission from the Tree Authority Mumbai for cutting of 18 trees including 1 Jambhul Tree and for transplanting of 1 tree of Ashoka. The permission was granted under Section 8(5) of the Maharashtra (Urban Areas) Protection and preservation of the Trees Act, 1975 under which the there is a statutory requirement of planting two trees for each felled tree within 30 days from the date of tree fell. The total numbers of the trees in existence were 38.
Thereafter the developer barricaded the area to be developed and felled about 17 trees which came in the basement boundary in the year 2008- 2009. Subsequently in the month of February, 2011 the developer felled one tree of Jambhul at Sr. no.1 which was not came in his development. When I complained to the B.M.C. garden Department and made enquiry I found the details of the permission for the said tree fell. Thereafter the developer pulled out the Ashoka tree at Sr, no.2 which was restricted to be transplant. As per my complaint to the Garden Department B.M.C. H-West ward, the Assistant Municipal Commissioner had been pleased to file N.C. complaint before the Sr. Inspector of Police Khar (W) Police Station. Subsequently the F.I.R. was issued under SPL LAC no.5 of 2012 against the developer by the Police. In the pendency of this the developer again pulled out one Coconut tree without permission of the Tree Authority and it was found that the developer already felled one Ashoka tree at sr. No.8 which was restricted to kept retain. Thus the developer has felled 3 trees without permission. The Total number of trees felled was 22 out of 38 trees.
It is pertinent to note that the developer had dug out land below to the rock and removed entire soil out of the plot and taken away the said soil elsewhere either in the sea. The developer constructed two basements and a 16 storied building in the place of soil with slab of Ramp on left, back and Right hand side of newly constructed building. Front side of the building contains soil but under it there is sanitary, water, electrical arrangement contained.
Now the question is no trees planted in lieu of felled 22 trees within 30 days and also no soil is remained to plant total no. of 44 trees. Can Ramp is capable of plant trees?
Developer was not arrested for violation of sections 8(5) and 21 of the Maharashtra (Urban Areas) Protection and preservation of the Trees Act, 1975. Police have filed just a Special Leave Application for the arrest of the developer and is pending and also it is possibility that the said proceedings will be dismissed if not properly handled by the P.P. of the Police Department. The tree fell is supposed to be non- cognizable offence and therefore the developer was not arrested even if the evidence is with the Tree Authority with a strict proof i.e. undertaking of the developer for planting of trees within 30 days. My various complaints for stop work to the Planning Authority were ignored and developer succeeded to complete 16 floors today without stop work. Now it is learnt from the Building & Proposal Department that the developer will obtained Occupation Certificate. About 15 flats of the building were illegally occupied by the members of the Society.
Please give me solution to this situation. Prior to the year 1973 when construction of the old building of the society was begun, there was a big Jungle with Teak wood and various valuable trees contained in the Schedule 2(f) of the Conservation and Preservation of the Private Forest Act, 1974. The trees in the said area were cleared in this way for the residents of the members of the Society who were came from outside the locality and formed their Society. They were not lords for clearing of the forest for there residence. If it continued like wised, there would be no longer the earth and trees remained in the Pali hill road area with the effect it will cause “ Global Warming “ to our earth Planet. The Maharashtra (Urban Areas) Protection and preservation of the Trees Act, 1975 is became the altra virus to the deemed private Forests in the urban areas and the said Act must be amended with a statutory restriction on felling of trees. At least if there are already authorised buildings in existence, it may be permitted to be developed to the extent of the area occupied by the buildings without causing any harm to trees. Police found to arrest the person who is not builder for violation of the tree Act.
Please give me advice to what exactly done for immediate arrest of the developer if there is Special Leave application is pending before the Hon’ble Metropolitan Magistrate Court and if the police department might loosing the matters for benefit of the developer ?
Thanks in advance for your prosperous help!
Sadanand B.Panchal
J S CHHABRA
01 August 2012 at 19:37
DEAR SIR,
WHAT IS THE REMEDY AGAINST THE ORDER BY ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER UNDER SECTION 138(2) OF PUNJAB MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ACT 1976. DETAILS AS FOLLOWS:
PAYMENT OF BILL WITH REBATE AS ON 8.6.2012
PAYMENT OF BILL WITHOUT REBATE ON 03.07.2012
NOTICE U/S 137 ON 19.07.2012
ORDER U/S 138(2) ON 24.07.2012
amit
31 July 2012 at 13:21
Sir,
I am serving army officer and is interested in the above exam which govt have held for state police officer,cpos and armed force officer with 35 yrs of age.
As a background the following are fact-
1. As per Army rule,a permanent commission officer can only be eligible if he supersedes.Selection Board take place in 15 yr of service.EVEN IF COMMISSIONING AGE is 20 yrs as in case of Ex NDA.offrs.they will be eligible only at age of 35 yrs.
2. In case of short service officer,he can apply for civil employment at the last 6 months of final yr of his agreement.Now SSC is for 10 yrs.Average age is 24 yrs when SSC offr get selected and 25 at time of commission.In this case also he is not able to write exam as he is turning 35 yrs.
IN BOTH CASES OPPORTUNITY IS BEING DENIED TO ARMY OFFICERS EVEN THEY ARE ALLOWED TO WRITE EXAM BY GOVT BECAUSE OF AGE.
SECOND issue ,
is pertaing to cut off bench mark of age which as per Ministry of home affair rule is 1 aug.
The CPO offrs age is considered on aug bench mark during initial recruitment before writing departmental exam for IPS.
Howeever army recruitment is held twice in yr with jan and july as benchmark.Person selected in Jan written and ssb subsequently join academy for training in month of september that year and person selected in july exam in month of april next year.
My querry is
1. Can a case be taken up for relaxation of age for subject exam to 36 yrs from 35 yrs keeping the service condition of army officers.
2. If not,atleast a case can be taken up to MHA to reduce benchmark from 01 aug of that year to 01 jan of year,so as to enable officers of army to write exam at least one.
At least they should not be denied the right of equal opportunity viz a viz officerrs of CPO as the part OF MHA and following aug bench mark and army lossing being on differnt rule and using jan as bench mark.
PLEASE SOLICIT ADVISE AND RIGHT COURSE OF ACTION.
brijesh sharma
25 July 2012 at 14:34
Please tell me any body from India, What can assume an Indian as a normal man from Hon’ble President’s Office, Prime Minister’s Office, Lower Parliament (Loksabha), Upper Parliament (Rajyasabha) and etc. A normal man is suffering from corruption, harassment, favoritism, nepotism. Implementation of every law, rule, and order is far away from its destination. Any type of report and data can be prepared. Recently Rs. 37 lakh rupees were spent on the renovation of two toilet of the planning commission, who submit its affidavit in Hon’ble Supreme Court of India “that if a normal man has about Rs. 28/- in his pocket, he is not poor? Hon’ble President’s Office, Prime Minister’s Office has opened a Online Helpline Portal for the people of India. Unfortunately service matters remain away from these portals. I take help these portals regarding my 20 years harassment of service life. Unfortunately after the about two years of time my grievances again reached to the same officers from them I was affected. They again replied against the rules framed by the Hon’ble Prime Minister’s Office (DOPT). Please tell how these Institutions can help a normal man? How a normal man can believe on these Institutions? Procedure of Hon’nble Court (lower court to High Court, High court to Hon’ble Supreme Court) is too much expensive and uncertain and also takes several decades. RTI act 2005 has also lost its credibility as government was trying. Every department having a sign board having instruction “Corruption Free Office, if you have any complaint asks the competent officer or complaint CVC Delhi”. There is no any fees limit for lawyers. Can any body tell the address and directory of affordable lawyers in Delhi and capital of States for relevant High courts? I am unable to understand this fact that, how corruption is so cheap then honesty and hard work”? Please clarify seriously. I have also request to all officers related with these Institutions. I have no any intention to complaint any body. I am submitting my any unconditional apology for the same. But I am asking for the betterment of the system, because our Hon’ble former President and newly appointed President have hint their doubt on the corruption. Please reply all of you.
SARAVANAN.R
23 July 2012 at 23:33
Respected Sir,
On verifying several papers on the internet, I find that in Golak Nath case, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India ruled that the Fundamental Rights guaranteed by the Constitution cannot be amended by Parliament.
In Kesavanand Bharti case, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India ruled that Fundamental Rights can be amended, but the basic structure of the Constitution cannot be taken away by the Parliament.
In the Minerva Mills Ltd case also, the above
decision was confirmed.
Kindly correct me if I am wrong on the above
I will be thankful, if you take pain in explaining the back ground of the above cases and how it is relevant today.
Also I have read that the decision in Kesavanand Bharti case nullified the decision of Golak nath case.
Whether the above ruling has anything to do with amendment in 1976.
Please correct me if I am wrong on the above.
Saravanan
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Right to privacy
A bank locker is the ideal place for a terrorist to keep his arms or stock RDX. None is supposed to know what is kept there inside the lockers.In my view more black money is kept inside the bank's lockers than stashed in swiss banks.
What is the exact law of the land which prohibits banks to know the contents being kept inside the banks' lockers.
Is it a question of right to privacy-right to keep RDX, unaccounted for cash or gold/jewelries inside bank lockers? Is it the fundamental right?
What exactly the rule position?