Dushyant Pandya
09 October 2012 at 16:49
Port Authorities had allotted lands on lease basis for development. The said leases were expired. Inspite of in ascending order only targeted lessees are evicted by port authorities and rest are enjoying inspite of leases were expired.
Is it not discrimination?
Bhawani Mahapatra
09 October 2012 at 14:56
What is the basis of fixing 21 & 18 respectively for boys & girls as marriagable age ?
Is is not violating the right to liberty of an individual ?
anil verma (registeronlyfree)
06 October 2012 at 10:03
Sir,
If the judges of High Court are not looking into the evidence provided with preconceived mind stating that petitioner has got the first right to say and you are respondent.
that how can we bring into the notice the evidence on record.
It appears there is an allergy to see-hear evidence provided which is resulting into the miscarriage of justice.
non of my lawyers are allowed to say anything before getting satisfactory reply of the statement given by the petitioner company.
if an aggrieved is poor and he cannot appeal to S.C then what is the remedy.
ROJA shree
05 October 2012 at 08:28
Sir,
what is the difference between S.482 Crpc & writ of mandamus? pls I need the answer in detail
Abhishek Mawle
03 October 2012 at 16:54
I stay at Bhopal for some months in a year with my parents and for some months with my wife and child at Nasik. In which constituency can I vote for MLA, MP, Counselor and MLC elections.
shekar hkes
03 October 2012 at 00:45
can indian national have dual citizenship
if its illegal what are the punishiment ?
anil verma (registeronlyfree)
02 October 2012 at 21:23
Sir,
i being medical representative, a sales promotion employee, against a exparte order of labour court on preliminary issue of workman, i approached honble' high court, which after 4 years held to be workman remanded the case to the labour court to decide it on merits within six months. but after years the case was decided on merits because at the last end of hearing the employer deliberately chooses not to appear and hence ex-parte award. against which recall application was filed which was also rejected in between the proceedings the issues were framed and these six issues ane after the other was challenged before hon'ble high court before the final award of labour court after concealing material facts in the recall application. there after the award was challenged before high court in year 2009 and was stayed till further order on the issue of workman which has attained finality and holding labour court has jurisdiction to hear the case. now before the high court last month evaluating the order of preliminary issue of coordinate bench my award has again been remanded back to the labour court after 15 years for the second time on the same issue making me where i was 15 years back. while the award was stayed i was neither reinstated nor compliance of 17=B was done and my application of 2009 of 17-B is still pending.
i am poor person now what is the effective remedy for me please suggest?
my entire family is under depression and tension.
pl provide maximum and effective suggestions together with some lawyer who can take up my case in lowest amount.
antariksh verma
02 October 2012 at 20:01
Sir,
i being medical representative, a sales promotion employee, against a exparte order of labour court on preliminary issue of workman, i approached honble' high court, which after 4 years held to be workman remanded the case to the labour court to decide it on merits within six months. but after years the case was decided on merits because at the last end of hearing the employer deliberately chooses not to appear and hence ex-parte award. against which recall application was filed which was also rejected in between the proceedings the issues were framed and these six issues ane after the other was challenged before hon'ble high court before the final award of labour court after concealing material facts in the recall application. there after the award was challenged before high court in year 2009 and was stayed till further order on the issue of workman which has attained finality and holding labour court has jurisdiction to hear the case. now before the high court last month evaluating the order of preliminary issue of coordinate bench my award has again been remanded back to the labour court after 15 years for the second time on the same issue making me where i was 15 years back. while the award was stayed i was neither reinstated nor compliance of 17=B was done and my application of 2009 of 17-B is still pending.
i am poor person now what is the effective remedy for me please suggest?
my entire family is under depression and tension.
pl provide maximum and effective suggestions together with some lawyer who can take up my case in lowest amount.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Extradition treaty with uk 1993
can accused of u/s 420/467/468/471 IPC be extradited from UK .According article 2 of this treaty allows ?