Anand Mohan Pathak
10 October 2012 at 18:15
In a great fraud case a company of England Shah textile corporation Menchester UK IN 1992 an investigation u/s 420/467/468/409 IPC is pending. 3 directors of above company had the address of company but that company is dissolved in 1994 is dissolved .High commissioner London check all possible means to search this company but at above address a new office of another nature is running from 1994 and telephone no also using by different persons .There is no correct address of the 3 directors except their names .In this case may prosecution apply for Rogatory request through concerning court or for extradition.
venkatesh Rao
10 October 2012 at 16:25
Dear experts,
I have got an interesting problem.
1.Whether the government for appointment of its posts, can fix quote between Direct Recruitment and Promotion?
2. Whether it can have three modes of appointment i.e., Direct recruitment, promotion and one more, BY TRANSFER FROM LOWER CADRE basing on higher educational qualification?
I shall be highly obliged for some Apex court citations.
bhimsingh
10 October 2012 at 11:17
Dear Friends,
1)Plz guide me whats the difference between Nationality & Citizenship in India?
2)My parents were born in nepal, but i am born in india DOB - 26.06.1983.So, what should my status,is it Nationality of india or Citizen of india?
3)As i am facing problem to apply for indian passport, as they are asking for my parents nationality.
4)Is it necessary to provide parents doc's to apply for your own passport?
Plz guide me in this matter along with proper ACTS/LAWS to prove it.
Regards...Bhim
Anand Mohan Pathak
09 October 2012 at 22:59
can accused of u/s 420/467/468/471 IPC be extradited from UK .According article 2 of this treaty allows ?
Dushyant Pandya
09 October 2012 at 16:49
Port Authorities had allotted lands on lease basis for development. The said leases were expired. Inspite of in ascending order only targeted lessees are evicted by port authorities and rest are enjoying inspite of leases were expired.
Is it not discrimination?
Bhawani Mahapatra
09 October 2012 at 14:56
What is the basis of fixing 21 & 18 respectively for boys & girls as marriagable age ?
Is is not violating the right to liberty of an individual ?
anil verma (registeronlyfree)
06 October 2012 at 10:03
Sir,
If the judges of High Court are not looking into the evidence provided with preconceived mind stating that petitioner has got the first right to say and you are respondent.
that how can we bring into the notice the evidence on record.
It appears there is an allergy to see-hear evidence provided which is resulting into the miscarriage of justice.
non of my lawyers are allowed to say anything before getting satisfactory reply of the statement given by the petitioner company.
if an aggrieved is poor and he cannot appeal to S.C then what is the remedy.
ROJA shree
05 October 2012 at 08:28
Sir,
what is the difference between S.482 Crpc & writ of mandamus? pls I need the answer in detail
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Pil matters
can a public interest litigation Intervened by way of another public intrest? is it practised in India ?