Suresh jain
10 August 2016 at 16:54
Sir,
I filled a suit is MSME facilitation centre after 10 days of limitation period. Centre given notice to me asking explanation that your case is time barred.Meanwhile the party released 50 % of debit amount to me. Please reply :- is this party again comes in regular period (Limitation period) ?? and advice the reply to be made by me to Centre for recovery of balance due and interest amount.
Suresh Jain
Ramsham
10 August 2016 at 15:52
I am from Bangalore, I was looking for Son's admission in one of the prestigious school unfortunately since my kid was 1.5 months younger i could not register online. I was desperately looking for some who could help me with admission. I came accross and lady who happens to be my daughter's class mater mom, i approached her for admission and she told she will help and took 50k by mode of online transfer. From the time she took, drama started saying that she is not well , or the agent is out of town and then some died and I could sense something wrong with her. And meanwhile I got admission for son in good school and i asked to return the money. from the time i asked to return she started behaving badly. out of 50 k she returned 10 once and 30 once...when i ask her for remaining she is abusing me that i did not keep my promise. Can some one help me. I have SMS where she mentioned that she gave money to Board memebers of that school.
Ratna Rani
10 August 2016 at 11:06
Hello sirji
I qury askin law of adoption.
Myself Ratna rani balong to SC category.
I married outside my kaste boy is not SC.
I have sun boye child now 11 years old.
I want my sun to get SC status.
So I ask my eldar brather Rambabu to adopt my sun.
Now will my son get SC status when Rambbabu brather adopt my sun.
Somebody helpp
anilkumar yadav
09 August 2016 at 22:48
Dear experts kindly give your valuable opinions.
In a suit for a will in dispute despite having 3-4 opportunities to cross examine the witnesses the plaintiff lawyer doesn't appears so the high court registrar closes the opportunity to cross examine them, in between the district courts pecuniary jurisdiction is increased and matter is transferred to lower court where the ADJ ignoring the HC's order asks the defendant to bring again his witnesses for cross examination.
Can this be done?
If not, what's the remedy. Between the two orders 18 months has passed.
Qurky11
09 August 2016 at 22:05
Hello experts,
While I was staying in Telangana , I had TVS Jupiter for 1.8 years after which I sold it back to Dealer from where i purchased it (Kaushik Motors, Karkhana Sec-Bad),given RC as well, as I was going to move to other state. In return they gave a delivery challan . It was in March 2016. I asked is there any thing or type of formality needed to be fulfilled by either party & they said no.
I moved to Punjab in March end 2016.
Then in June 2016, I got a message that a challan is fined for driving without helmet. I spoke to person at Kaushik Motors & informed them i received message for challan, they said that it will be done sooner. 1st it was showing only 1 challan,but when I checked later by month end there were 4 challans all related to driving without helmet ( But I didn't receive any msgs for those). I again spoke to them & they said my vehicle isn't sold yet, I objected strongly & told them to solve this issue & stop using it for their personal usage, they said that within 1 week my name will be cleared from it, but after 3 weeks also it is still showing vehicle on my name only.
Please provide me guidance on this, what legally or Formally I need to have or talk about to these guys ? Can the vehicle be transferred to agency so that in case of anything -agency gets liable & responsible ? Anything I need to do for RTO or such transport authority (otherwise RTO which one & how) What shall I do,as I am living far away from Telangana & can't go there just for that.
I am worried, what if it got misused in dangerous way or any serious accident,it is still showing my name as the owner.
Or shall I be relaxed as I have Delivery Receipt from Agency stating I sold them my vehicle back already ?
Help needed,
shubhra
09 August 2016 at 18:13
There was a builder pvt ltd co. WIth two directors and they floated a plan to make a mall and sell the shops on floors.
We entered into an agreement with one of the two directors in year 2009.
The mall was never constructed.
The first directed expelled the other director in year 2012. an fir was registered against the director in 2014(with whom we entered in an agreement)
Now the said builder has filed a civil suit to declared the agreement null and void.
On other hand we filed in consumer court and our application was allowed. NOw the builder is in appeal in state commission and the civil suit is pending.
is this civil suit maintainable ?
Sandeep Gupta
09 August 2016 at 11:58
Sir hamara advocate humein vakalatnama nahi de raha hai taaki hum dusra vakil kar sakey . dus saal se case chal raha hai decree ho chuki hai phir bhi date pe date mil rahi hai toh ab hum kya kare .
Sir please help us
sagar Rao
09 August 2016 at 11:31
Sir,
District Court had given demolishen order of illegal and unauthorized construction of my neighbor building, for which i had filled case in court.
Now my neighbor wants to compromise with me by taking care of wherever i had problem with his building, and apart from that he is ready to give some amount as compensation for problem faced by me due to his building construction.
My advocate and all my community people are advice-ed me to compromise, as we live in same locality and we should be good to every one.
My question is having court demolition order how can i compromise with my neighbor, is that court will monitor the demolition of building with the municipal corporation or not, what kind of problems will come to me in future, what precautions to be taken, Please inform me for which i am very grateful to you.
Thanks & Regards,
Sagar
Hyd
krishna
08 August 2016 at 21:54
Hon. Members,
After filling our fresh suit on the same cause, office of court took objection of limitation & matter was sent to judge for removing objection thereafter we satisfied the court & court gave the benefit of section 14 of limitation act & considered the suit within limitation prima facie.
Now after serving Writ of summons, Defendants took objection of limitation & requested to frame preliminary issue.
Defendants do not have any strong evidence to say that plaintiff is not eligible for the benefit of section 14.
In such situation, Can court or will court frame preliminary issue on limitation, when court has already considered suit within limitation prima facie?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Allotments
Hello My Experts,
my case is of auction shed allotment which was cancelled by market committee Civil suit filed in 2010,that was rejected Under Order 7 Rule 11 {Order 7 Rule 11application filed by Market Committee}after 5 years of suit in lower court due to no notice to Market Committee under Section 31 of the Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961) before filling of suit.
I request all of you to help me