Hi I'm MrX
02 May 2017 at 01:23
I am purchasing my Adjacent flat.
Both the flats are separated by a Single Brick Wall which connects both the Living Area, I want to make a pass-through in the wall which connects both the living room..I do not want to break the whole wall but just a passage in between.
What are the requirements and how do I go about with these changes...
1) I have already asked an Architect to give me a written letter stating that the changes I do to the room are not damaging or effecting any Load Bearing Walls or Pillars or Beams.
2) I will give the Architects letter to the society notifying them about the changes?
What else has to be done? Do I have to take give a letter to the BMC? Bcoz I read that now there is no need to take permission from BMC for such modifications
PSUDHAKAR
01 May 2017 at 20:02
sir
to sale the minor property how many days it will take to get permission from District Court.
Joint property of Minor son and his mother.
what are the documents required to file the suit.
is it compulsory of sale agreement before filing .
sale agreement with advance taking is considerable or not.
Please clarify
Debjit
01 May 2017 at 17:09
My father is fighting a tenant eviction case since 1991. The case is in last stage. But the tenant died few months back. he has 6 successors including his widow. Now one of the successor, his youngest son has come up to fight the case. Can he do so without other successors in the team ? If he does so, how can we restrict others to come up in future to fight against us ? As it will be painful for us if they come one by one to continue the case. Request guide what the law says, and what would be the right step at this time.
PSUDHAKAR
01 May 2017 at 15:36
Sir
My father gifted self acquired property to my mother. my father died recently can my mother sell property to third party with out signature of son.
or my mother can gifted property to his son
Debasish karmakar
01 May 2017 at 00:49
Whether a licensor can ask the licensee to vacat his premises after expiry of lock in period 3 months during the tenure of leave and license for the period of 11 months. The leave and license agreement is made for 11 months and it is still continuing. The licensor issued a one month notice to the licensee asking him to vacate the premises. What should I do against their act and is there any interim relief or should I go before the Civil Court or should I file any SUIT.WHAT IS THE RELIEF.
sachin gupta
01 May 2017 at 00:27
Sir my wife report to police station with false dowry and home voilance case. What i can do. She report all of my family member name in it.
Member (Account Deleted)
30 April 2017 at 18:22
Sir need your help we are many people stuck in legal battle with a fraudulent person who was well versed in law and is we are all fighting legal battle against him but loosing.
Mr Amit sarup ans Mr pradeep sachdeva posed as partners of a company M/s Pritika fashions and gave me a franchise for my store in indirapuram, i was to be paid 35% commission in sales and had the right to take out my profit from the store. It was clearly mentioned that brand PRITIKA is registered brand of this company and only this company has rights to open any new store of PRITIKA.
Soon after they approached me for a store in Rajori garden of Pritika, and took 26 lacs from me and wrote on the cheque that "taking this money for store of Pritika", the money was taken this time in account of new company with same name as PRITIKA FASHIONS pvt ltd(in which they r Directors), and we were told that they have converted pritika fashions a partnership firm into pvt ltd company.
After taking money he started asking for more money, And also showed an article in popular business magazine which had ad of PRITIKA FASHIONS pvt ltd using logo of PRITIKA FASHIONS and also his interview with same logo(thus making both appear as the same company).
Under pressure i gave 4 lacs more, and then he provided an MOU with PRITIKA FASHIONS pvt ltd for a store in kamla nagar instead of Rajori garden. Money was taken as REFUNDABLE SECURITY DEPOSIT and was taken in the name of company(Directors signing so treated as agents of company).
Anyways cut the long story short, didn't give any returns and than closed the store and meanwhile transferred all property in wife's name.
I filed FIR and on the basis of FIR it was found REFUNDABLE SECURITY DEPOSIT has gone into another partnership firm of his and his wife, and into his personal account, also he has also transferred all properties in the name of his wife.
I also filed a civil fraud on him and his wife and partner(after he had transferred all in his wife's name around 3cr worth properties).
Now he is saying wife had nothing to do with the case and was only a vendor.
Problem is he has kept nothing in his name.
I also have a mail forwarded by him to me from that company, which is a mail sent to both him and his wife, the mail was of sales record of my first outlet. (I.e internal mail of sales record showing showroom was run by both of them).
If he looses case and claims bankruptcy, can i challenge the transfer of property after agreement but before case filed, in the name of his wife by him, who is also a beneficiary of REFUNDABLE SECURITY DEPOSIT transfer, and was also running store 1. Company has long been shut and no scope of recovery from company.
Mohammed Rizwan Shaikh
30 April 2017 at 17:17
Sir,
A Muslim client of An advocate who is also the executor of the Will. Before the death of his few days before he handed over the copy of the said Will to the Clients son. The son lodged false complaint with the police that the will is forged and bogus however the original will is in the advocates custody and not yet lodged for probate.
Can any advocate handover the copy of the will to his before the death of the testator? will this act go against the Advocate if the son says that the will is forged? what will be the courts view?
Regards,
Mohammed Shaikh
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Review
Mact tribunal awarded compensation from driver and rc owner. Though rc owner received notice in the op, he did not appear as the actual owner (sale deed owner) assured him that he would appear and do the necessary to exonerate him frim the liabilities. Anyway actual owner did not do anything to save rc owner from this. Petitioner filed ep. Then only rc owner got the I information that he step backed from his assurances. More over sale deed owner made forged vakalath, written statement etc. .so as to make the tribunal to made an award against rc owner. Now rc owner would like to file review petition to review the matter so that he could give his evidence to prove his innocence. Is review court can make an order to take new fresh evidence and dispose the matter afresh.