Raghu ponnala
02 July 2018 at 17:41
In 1976 their was a compromise decree for 21 acres of land in three different syno. from the aggreement of sale executed in 1962. an EP 58/84 filed for the first compromise decree in this EP Parties entered into another compromise decree on (Second Compromise decree) DHR/Plaintiff was allotted 12 acres, and EP is closed.
30-06-92.(MRO file No.C/7/1992) After compromise decree, DHR/Plaintiff, instead of approaching the executing court, for registration of the sale deed, Basing on the said compromise decree, the MRO after collecting the Stamp duty and registration fee, with the consultation of the concerned Subregistrar,has issued a certificate, After issuing the above certificate, the petitioners/Defendants have preferred the
present appeal before the concerned Revenue Divisional Authority claiming that the MRO has not given any notice before issuing the said certificate and also the MRO has no jurisdiction to entertain the said case.The RDO opinioned that since it is a decree passed by a civil court and that the MRO has rightly passed the said order and hence there is no need to middle with the orders of the lower
court and accordingly the appeal is dismissed. As against the orders of RDO, the Revision Petitioners/Defendants have preferred the
present Revision. After due enquiry, the Joint Collector has dismissed the Revision and confirmed the orders passed by the below revisional authorities. of the A.P. Rights in Land and Pattdar Pass. As against the said orders of joint Collector, the Revision Petitioners/defendants have
filed a Writ Petition before the High Court. The Hon’ble High Court has confirmed the orders of below authorities and dismissed the Writ Petition. In its orders, the High Court has disclosed that the plea of not issuing notice cannot be raised at this point of time and the revisional authorities have rightly passed the orders as per the Act. As against the said order, the Revision Petitioners preferred this Writ Appeal before the Division Bench. In this, the Division Bench has quashed all the orders passed below authorities and also set aside the orders of the High Court, Single Judge. SLP NO. 10907/2005. As against the said orders, the DHR/Plaintiff preferred this SLP and the SLP
is Dismissed on 13/10/2015
My lawyer filed two petitions EA 744 to open EP 58/84 and EA 745 to execute the sale deed of the second compromise decree for 12 acres. after the supreme court order in 2015.
Q1 Can we open the EP 58/84 and execute the court compromise decree.
Q2 or need to file fresh EP For the second compromise decree for 12 acres with limitation act section 14 for condonation of time spent from 1992 to 2015.
Mansoor
02 July 2018 at 11:06
We are leasing a home in Bangalore, after the lease period is over landlord is not returning the money. When went and asked to landlord for the same, he was just playing some blame games and once he threatened my dad with rowdy fellows.
So, we decided to send a legal notice to the landlord and approached a lawyer. We sent a legal notice to the landlord on below basis:
1. Filing a criminal case for threatening.
2. And to return the lease money with the illegally collected rent every month.
On above 2 basis we have sent a legal notice to the landlord and told him to return the money with 15 days.
Lawyer was saying, if in 15 days landlord does not return the money then we can file a case against landlord(which was in legal notice too).
Last 2 days back, my lawyer has changed his mind and he is saying that we cannot take any legal action within 3 months. Lawyer is playing a double game on both sides and taking money from both of parties. So, I would like to change lawyer.
Could someone suggest the procedure to change a lawyer. Case has not gone to the court yet. Just we have sent a legal notice.
If I want to follow up with a new lawyer then should I sent a new legal notice from a new lawyer or can I proceed further on top of old notice only.
Please someone suggest me on this.
practicing advocate
02 July 2018 at 09:26
Respected Learned Counsel
I had filed an application for heirship certificate under the Bombay Regulation Act A synopsis of the cases is that immovable property left after the deceased and upon the submission of all the documents still tuehe civil judge is insisting on producing the documents pertaining to property.As this is property is situated in ulhasnagar where going back to say 1960 only the tax receipts is there is in the name of the deceased there is no documents of agreement of sale during such period everybody used to occupy the land and the municipal corporation is just collecting the taxes from them and as the land belongs to the municipal corporation only.
My query is that is any legal options available with me in the absence of documents of agreement.
Can the civil judge is authorised to insist on the production of the same despite my repeated statements that during such periods almost all the lands were occupied in the same manner as a proof only municipal tax receipts and electricity bill is there.
is it mandatory to produce such documents to obtain heirship certificate.
please guide me
Anonymous
02 July 2018 at 06:38
An ancestral property is in litigation. Hiers of original owners has filed case to revise the distribution of land (in view of new highway approach).
Can my father and uncles sell this property?
Member (Account Deleted)
01 July 2018 at 21:03
Can I submit an application of Interim Relief on the second date at National Commission against the builder
What are the points/matters/provision will the court consider while granting the relief?
Brief facts of the case are mentioned below ( in response / reply 1)
Ritesh Rathod
01 July 2018 at 19:57
Dear sir, my wife order a loreal shampoo product online through flipkart after a month of received of products when my wife use the shampoo it looks like not genuine product even lead of the shampoo bottel was also broken. So i write a mail to consumer care of loreal company. Loreal company reply that they never sold loreal product online even after batch reference analysis they come to know that product is not match with their record and they replied that product is spurious. Kindly advice what action i can took
Surrender K Singal
01 July 2018 at 15:37
In a Writ Petition matter, application for vacation of Stay of all proceedings consequetal to an Arbitration Award filed on 03 July 2017 continuing to remain "To Be Listed", what can be the remedy for getting the same listed / heard / decided, even after 11 months ? What direction can be sought from SC for such state of affairs at Chhatisgarh HC, and how ?
Surrender K Singal
01 July 2018 at 15:26
As an Award of 2015 has since been adjudicated u/s 34 by an ADJ in Haryana with participation by both parties from 2015 till Jan 2018 when the same was partly set aside for modification of rate of interest in terms of The MSMED Act, 2006, what application under what section of Arb &Conc Act,1996 can be moved before another ADJ in Andhra Pradesh, where similar petition u/s 34 (filed after the notice from Haryana ADJ) had been filed by Award Debtor (JD) for dismissal / closure of that later filed petition u/s 34 in respect of the SAME Award ?
Member (Account Deleted)
01 July 2018 at 15:07
can the builder make such argument at Consumer Court that the claim of Complainant is not admissible on the grounds of absence of Probate.
Builder had entered into agreement with my grandmother and my grandmother is no more
There is a dispute relating to flat and I (legal heir as per WILL) have filed a petition at Consumer Court.
I have a WILL which is Notarised (certified by doctor and two witnesses)
Is probate required to Sue the opposite party for non performance of Contract
I guess as per section 2 of Consumer Protection Act, Complainant can be Consumer or Legal heir/representative of Deceased Consumer.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Refund of advance paid to builder
I booked a flat by paying 3lakhs advance to the builder while it is in finishing stage. Now it got completed but to my surprise the builder has badly designed the drainage system of the bath rooms out let. He connected the top floor drinage connection passing from my bathroom by making a hole to the top bath room vise verse my bath room connection to the down floor. If any leakage occurs on the top floor bath room my entire bath room will get spoilt like wise if my bath room gets leak the down floor person will suffer. This is very improper civil engineering. Generally every thbathroom drinage system is to be connected out side of there respective floors. I have not satisfied and hence decided to cancell my booking for which builder is refusing to return my money. please suggest what action I have to take to get back my amount. No registered agreement has been executed between both of us except obtaing a receipt on plain paper.