Shaik
23 September 2018 at 12:07
Dear Sir,
My self Saleem recently got selected as mess staff civilian employee in IAF
I was not allowed to leave beard as my trade was mess staff... (Other trade exceot mess staff are allowed to leave beard)
I want to know is there any rule that one should not allow beard.. I have seen many airforce service men who are Muslim and leaving beard.. but I'm a civilian employee
Kindly let me know what to do further as I want to leave beard... Is there any option to change the trade...
Early reply from you will be highly appreciable..
Regards
Shaik saleem
NAGARAJ
22 September 2018 at 21:40
im plaintiff advocate .. prior to filing the suit the defendant entered in to the unregistered agreement with the third party in the year of 2005, now during the cross of DW1 may i confront the unregistered agreement and mark as exhibit ?
....and whether this document attracts stampduty and kar stamp act sec 34 and 35?
if confront by the defendant who has to pay stampduty..?
Kumaresh SV
22 September 2018 at 18:26
Sir high court of Karnataka gave judgement to pollution control board to close some industries but after a year they opened the industries when we again lodged complaint pollution control board says court order withstands . unfortunately we don't have that judgement copy can we get the judgement copy through rti if yes what is the procedure if we mention the year of the judgement I'd it enough plz help
Nitin Kedia
22 September 2018 at 16:01
One of the two brothers is trying to sell their undivided portion of inherited property.
1. How can this sale be avoided.
2. What remedy he has if he himself want to purchase that portion.
3. If the sales deed is already executed than what remedy he has.
BHARTI KOTHARI
22 September 2018 at 12:22
hi we purchased 7 flat in a building for residential purpose as we need the same for accomodating company staff as well for family purpose. we are in flim production business. infact while making loan application it was purchased in the joint name of husband and wife who were the only director of firm and even firm was co applicant. accordingly loan was sanctioned and builder was paid. that however on site the allegd flat were not there and therefore we have filled consumer comnplaint.
1. am i am consumer ?
2. what other remedy I have against the builder ?
3. Can we also take action against bank who has disbursed loan against the property which was not in existence ?
Thanks for the expert for guiding juniar in anticipation
shyamal
22 September 2018 at 08:40
Sir
My father made a will where he gave a single storied building to me. There were 4 legal heirs. We did not take probate. Instead we did mutation in the municipality. In the form of the municipality and in the Affidavit, I was the first applicant and the rest followed.
However, my brother went for hearing in the municipality and we all gave him the power of authority .When I received the mutation certificate, I saw that the name of my mother was in the first place and the name of myself was in the second place.
Please guide me to know whether the Sl No of the names in the mutation certificate really matters in the ultimate ownership of the building or whether there is any procedure so that necessary correction can be made and bring back my name in the first place.
Shyamal.
4WhatIsRight
22 September 2018 at 02:50
In a suit for specific performance the defendant is not admitting the execution of the agreement for sale for property, but at the same time is requesting the court to impound the said agreement, as it is understamped, and levy penalty.
Can an agreement whose execution is disputed be impounded and penalty levied?
Anonymous
21 September 2018 at 21:29
My grand father got one house property .and a agriculture land through gift deed and one house property also purchased as self aquired property...and my grand father asking his elder brother for his share in joint family oroperties and filed a partition suit in 2005 for joint family property.....now my grand father brother legal hairs wanted to join my aunty gifted property.alongwith selfaquired house property in to the partition suit.whether it is maintainable
Anonymous
21 September 2018 at 09:47
[On 3-3-2016 we had paid money to fortis hospital Bangalore for the operation of my mother in law for knee replacement.
We had paid 5 lakh rupees on the day of our 1st visit. No tests were conducted and the operation was scheduled at a later date of 4 months. But the operation never took place till date. The hospital made excuse of non availability of doctor etc. as the hospital acted suspiciously we recorded our calls and sessions with counselor and assistant doctor.
Since the hospital never conducted surgery or knee replacement we asked our money back.
But the hospital started new tune stating that they had purchased hardware for surgery and said they will deduct 2 lakh rupees and give back the money.
We were not fine with it. So we filed case in consumer court in person.]
Now.
The OP have filed their version. Affidavit. The OP are 4 parties. 2 counsellors and 2 doctors. What they have mentioned in version is not at all mentioned in their affidavit.
In affidavit the counselors state that the doctors orally gave permission to file affidavit, hence they are filing affidavit and they gave permission to file application under CPC 151 asking court to allow them to file documents.
The Court asked us to file objections. We filed objections as the hospital never told all this or did they give any bill or report for test conducted. The judge dismissed our objectoins prayer and allowed the hospital documents to be marked.
In documents they have given bills of money paid as advance to doctors. Money paid for hardware. Tests conducted. These amount to 3 lakhs.
The doctors affidavit contain cost details of the knee replacement, tests etc. But they themselves never explained any of these to us.
The hospital never conducted any tests on my mother in law nor did give these bills then in 2016. They just gave 2 bills for amount received for knee transplant.
Why they have filed affidavit like this? What is their purpose behind this.
Case posted for written arguments, in written arguments what we should put?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Plaintiffs hid material facts.
I am compelled to post it as anonymous and query is repeated but simplified.
In a suit involving shoddy deals by plaintiff firm of two partners vs defendant my late poa and me, and not party to suit illegal possessors (a mill) of the suit property( illegal tenants " possessions given by plaintiffs)
Plaintiffs had obtained stay and I was not aware as my late poa was handling the matter.
I sold the plot to possessors. Plaintiffs were unaware for 7 years.
In suit plaintiffs a firm stated on oath that
they had the possession and they were paying taxes and also stated that they had leased it to mill, which was a lie, in fact they had illegally sold it to the mill and were never conducting business in the name of the firm( surviving partner has confirmed that the said business of the firm in whose name disputed agreement was done never carried out business). It was a sham firm.
During pendency of suit title got transferred in the name of the illegal possessors/mill.As plaintiffs never had anything to with the plot as they had illegally sold were unaware of the transfer for 7 years. Also one partner out of two died. Issues were framed. From. Issues framed it is clear that court has not taken cognizance of death of the partner. Surviving partner gave witness statement,gets cross examined. After seven years surviving partner files breach of injunction under 39 2a and I am threatened of imprisonment etc.
It is ten years now, court not summoning me neither giving judgment.
Plaintiffs breach of injunction reveals their lie that they had the possession and were paying taxes. There was no legal lease agreement with possessors. Plaintiffs unregistered firm of two, one main partner who signed the disputed agreement in the name of the firm no more.
Can I file the counter suit for giving false statement on oath in original suit that the property is legally leased and plaintiffs are paying taxes and they were in possession.
If it were true how the firm/ surviving partner remained ignorant for seven years.
Lawyers due to local nexus playing safe and may be interested in prolonging.
I am at far off place.
Possessors keeping distance from me. Plaintiff has also applied for their implead-ment
Regards