shrikant chede
30 April 2010 at 11:37
Electricity theft is detected under section 135 of Indian Elecricity ACT 2003 The accussed pay the assesment amount and compounding charges in order to avoid lodging of F.I.R . afterward made complaint to electrical inspector under section 127 of Indian Elecricity ACT 2003 , In above Act electrical inspector has no power to deal with matter connected with section 135 ,the elecrical inspector givesorder to refund the money to the accussed ,In this senario what should bedone? is it advissable to file writ in Hon'ble High court to quash the order issued by the elecrical inspector ,who has no power in law to pass the order
Jibanananda Goswami
30 April 2010 at 10:26
Respected Sirs,
I need to know some information about employment under Central Govt.
1. List of the posts where MCA degree is the desired qualification.
2. How many MCA degree holders are working under Central Govt? Their university, passing year and marks.
3. If they got the job after MCA or got promotion/transfer after getting MCA?
4. How many posts are empty now?
5. Is all MCA from all university are eligible for those posts, or there is any condition?
(Posts mean "Posts where MCA is the desired qualification")
Please tell me the departments from where I can extract the information. The next questions are law related, please answer here.
6. Is there any MCA equivalent qualification? I found that DOEACC 'B' level is equivalent to MCA. But after searching for supporting document, I found a notification from Ministry of HRD where the word "equivalent" is never used. View the notification at http://www.doeacc.edu.in/jsp/B%20Level%20Notification.htm
Please tell me whether the notification means "B-Level equivalent to MCA"
7. Whether Ministry of HRD (or any other Ministry) is empowered to declare any qualification equivalent to a Degree (MCA)?
jimmy
30 April 2010 at 09:18
Sir/Madam,
There was a civil matter bet'n my pvt.ltd.company and one co-op bank in the state of maharashtra. The co-operative court had ruled out the order against us 'ex-parte', and based on that order, the bank started it's recovery/decree proceedings. But later we appealed for delay condonation at the civil appellete court and there also the order was passed against us without granting our delay condonation.We then approached the High court, but there also the order was passed asking us to pay 50% of loan amount in the HC to avail the stay. We later approached to the supreme court with SLP(CIVIL)under article 136 seeking an interim relief against the HC order, as we were not ready to deposit the 50% amount. The SC dismissed our petetion asking us to withdraw it and to seek an 'extention' at the HC only to deposit the said amount!
We in fact want to fight this case on merits and we have a fair chance of proving our points, provided we are simply granted a delay condonation and given a chance to prove our points!
We seek an expert advise on this issue about how to go ahead at this stage!
G. ARAVINTHAN
29 April 2010 at 22:52
Suit dismissed after contest with exemplary contest of Rs.20,000/-.
Now what is the remedy for the defendant to recover the costs.
EP or separate proceedings for recovery of money
Anonymous
29 April 2010 at 19:36
how to form a society when land is not registered, whether it is legal if not what can be the steps to make it legal
suhas digambar kharadkar
29 April 2010 at 18:46
We have filed writ petition in Mumbai High Court against an order passed by Sr Divn Court in Pune. The petition in high court is due for admission on 09.06.10. However in the lower court/ sr divn court in Pune the defendents are pressurising and asking the court to fix a date and give order on interim injunction (nishani 5) .The date fixed is 03.05.10. we are arguing that since the writ petition is filed in high court the lower court should stay the proceedings or wait for some time. Whether we can pray to the lower court that since the writ petition is filed in high court please give us adjuranment of date or stay the proceedings. Is there any provision in the act on this subject. Or any decided case law or judgement on the subject matter.
Kindly guide us urgently Since the date fixed by lower court is 03.05.10
arun bansal
29 April 2010 at 00:40
where the def'dant objected stronglly by submitted written arguments and oral argument before the ADJ in app OVI r17 but the ADJ disposed the application by allowing the application of p'tiff.
later the def'dant found in order sheet that the order stated on joint request of allowing the appication the judge allow the same.
whether any action in civil law against such action of ADJ
Anonymous
28 April 2010 at 21:27
Pl urgently advice Sirs,
Tenant (Pet) has filed a IA petition to deposit rents in the court as the DD was returned by the defendant(owner).
Firstly, The DD was insufficient rent on the other hand it was sent on incorrect name thereby the bankers on tech grounds rejected to clear the same.The same DD was returned to the pet but the pet refused to receive the cover sent by RPAD.
Previously the DD even though insufficient was with drawn as the defendant is old 67 yrs. unemployed person and was depended entirely on the rent with no other source of income.To harass the owner, the tenant is not paying rents at all on the pretext of IA.
Since 1 year the tenant is not paying rent nor has deposited in court as the IA for depositing in court is still pending.
The defendant in beginning i.e., the first rent received by DD intimated the tenant by telegram to pay full rent, which the tenant failed to do so.
The def is penniless and is trying to find it hard to sustain. Is there any provision in CPC to direct the petitioner to immediately deposit the rents? pendig the IA filed?
and
is it sufficient that the def has informed in the initial stage to pay full rent and there by legally claim them. The pet has forged rental receipts to under value it by more than half the value.
In case forgery is proved can the def stand to claim rents as intimated by telegram?
Pl advice as matter is urgent.
sincerely
Anonymous
28 April 2010 at 17:40
There was a company called Yescube Infrastructure Limited who had come up with a plan of construction in Dombivali, and in Nerul with the Down payment of some amount and the rest amount can be paid in EMI by Post Dated cheques. The plan was for 4 buildings i.e. A, B, C, and D. At the time of booking of flats D’s construction was going on. Now they have runaway with all the money and are absconding. Now all the flat buyers are came together and are thinking for the forming of society and to start the work of the building. The land is on the name of the owner of YIL. What are the legalities which will have to face by the flat buyers and what formalities and legalities need to be done by the buyers. Kindly guide on the same on urgently.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
theft case under I.E.ACT
Electricity theft is detected under section 135 of Indian Elecricity ACT 2003 The accussed pay the assesment amount and compounding charges in order to avoid lodging of F.I.R . afterward made complaint to electrical inspector under section 127 of Indian Elecricity ACT 2003 , In above Act electrical inspector has no power to deal with matter connected with section 135 ,the elecrical inspector givesorder to refund the money to the accussed ,In this senario what should bedone? is it advissable to file writ in Hon'ble High court to quash the order issued by the elecrical inspector ,who has no power in law to pass the order
Thanks in advance for reply