Consideration Of sale deed

Respected experts,
I had purchased a land from the heir of owner of that land some 55 yrs back. Suddenly/recently a person showed a certified copy of a sale deed executed by grandfather of the heirs who sold me. In that sale deed it is written that possession of only original sale deed document will be proof of consideration amount paid. The deed was executed 70yrs back. He even does not have proof of payment of the consideration. They do not know or able to explain about the original sale deed. When we inquired about this from the seller, they say that we are unaware of any such sale deed. and we sure that our grand father has not any land/ even inch of land during his life time. Can incidence of Impersonation be assumed? Will they have to explain the where about or what happened to the original sale deed? If they do not show the original sale deed or explain about what happened to the original or any other proof of consideration paid, will it be considered void? Does he is having better title than me? Can we assume that since no consideration was paid, so no title passed, subsequently grandchildren sold it to us? Land is vacant.
Thanks and regds.

Consideration Of sale deed

How to controll nussance person?

In our society a person creating problem to everybody,quarralling for minour thing,
Gunda type beahiver,taunt/comments to ladies.No one come openly to complain against him.
And police needs prouf against him.
Please tell me How to controll over him?

Revocation of Gift Deed

Sir,

My mother is a donee of a registered gift deed executed by my grand father for 1/6th share in a property in the family property since 2001. Our legitimate 1/6th share was removed in 1999, and subsequently out of love and affection my grand father reinstated our share by way of this gift deed. The deed has no conditions for revocation of the same. However, in 2005 the gift deed was cancelled without any intimation to us. We became aware of this only now. We have also come to know that the property has been sold and the monies have been distributed amongst other family members. Please advise what is the legal recourse for the same.

start of trial pending IA

Sir,

An IA was filed by the petitioners about 8 months back. The enquiry is not done and IA not disposed. In the OS trial has not begun in spite of 2 years lapsed.

The petitioners on some or other pretext are unduly delaying and dragging the matter by filing IA's which are vexatious and few dismissed by the court previously.

In spite of several adjournments in the past 10 months the petitioners are not attending the court and the hon'ble court is granting time liberally.

I want the IA and OS to be disposed at the earliest, Please advice.

Whether my counsel can complete the arguments in IA with the petitioners counsel and is it mandatory for the documents to be marked be the start of the trial.

Can orders be passed ex-parte in the IA, pl suggest. What best should my counsel do in IA's and OS?

Thanks

start of trial pending IA

to the above query pl clarify,

whether my counsel can complete the arguments in IA and is it mandatory for the documents to be marked be the start of the trial.

Can orders be passed ex-parte in the IA, pl suggest. What best should my counsel do?

Thanks

start of trial pending IA

Sir,

An IA was filed by the petitioners about 8 months back. The enquiry is not done and IA not disposed. In the OS trial has not begun in spite of 2 years lapsed.

The petitioners on some or other pretext are unduly delaying and dragging the matter by filing IA's which are vexatious and few dismissed by the court previously.

In spite of several adjournments the petitioners are not attending the court and the hon'ble court is granting time liberally.

I want the IA and OS to be disposed at the earliest, Please advice.

Thanks

Is it possible in the Supereme Court of India ?

Respected Sir(s),
I am amazed to see a judgment of Hon,ble Supereme Court Of India vide which the Judgement of High Court and of Ombudsman in the matters of PSEB has be reverted by the Supreme Court in a civil appeal filed by PSEB. The point of my surprise is that that Hon'ble Supereme Court did not consider it necessary to call the party or even inform the party concerned against which the said appeal was filed and judgment is given. The party ( a consumer of PSEB ) who had won his case from the Ombudsman and appeal of PSEB against the decision of Ombusman had been dismissed by the High Court Chandigarh; did not even know that further an appeal by PSEB has been filed in the Superme Court. He (Consumer) was shoked to see the order of Supereme Court against him. Is it possibe and just that Supereme Court hear the case/appeal and give the judgement in the absence of party concerned ?

Ex parte

When a defendant does not appear to the first hearing of the suit the order 9 rule 6(1)(a) apply. Which rule apply when defendant does not appear in subsequent hearing of suit?

property card.

what do u mean by property card & its advantges & dis advantages ? The period till the card is valid.