Arvind Singh Chauhan
14 June 2010 at 08:21
Sir soldier of ITBP died in 1993 during his duty in high altitude. After his death his wife was provided with service in ITBP on compensatory ground and pension also. Later on wife remarriages and left her mother in law. Mother of soldier applied for family pension that her family is totally helpless now. Daughter in law gives no objection for providing family pension to her mother in law.
People helped her in all correspondence since 1995. In 2005 she was informed that her daughter in law’s family pension has been closed. On 22-072009 she was informed that her request for family pension has been accepted and instructed her to full fill necessary formalities. Immediately she full filled all required formalities. Again she received copy of letter dated 22-09-2009 from Central Record Office ITBP addressed to Accounts Officer ITBP saying that “IT IS THEREFORE REQUESTED TO AUTHORIZE FAMILY PENSION TO SMT DEVKI AT THE EARLIEST OPPORTUNITY ”. But no action was taken. Again with the help of people regular correspondence was made but at last poor old lady died on 01.06.2010 due to illness, lack of proper food and medication.
Sir whether her unemployed son can claim the arrears of family pension up to the date of her death. The poor labour is unable to approach to higher court. Whether suit can be filed in lower court? if yes please advice proper law and provision. What steps should be taken against the responsible authorities who didn’t took step in one year and left the lady die.
A YOGANANDA SWAMY
14 June 2010 at 07:41
I am working in a private bank and the corporate office of the bank is situated at Chennai. There is a clause of Arbitration in their loan agreement and the Arbitration Proceedings will be held at Chennai.
My question is, after passing of the arbitration award at chennai, whether transmission from Chennai Court to District Court is required to file the EP before the District Court OR Not? If not provide the ruling of the Apex Court Or High Court.
Anonymous
13 June 2010 at 20:44
A Company on end of lease-period vacated the premises and sought the advance amount paid. The premises owner refuses to accept the keys and demands exorbitant charges (over and above the advance money) stating one or the other reasons. The company is willing to do needful repairs, if any.
What is the remedy available to the erst-while tenant company?
Tks.
pratik
13 June 2010 at 20:04
When the State Govt Employee is caught while taking bribe under the anti corruption act , he/she will be arrested and produced before the magistrate. Once he obtains bail he is drawing fifty percent of his salary. my question is 1. How many months he / she will get the 50 percent salary, a certain limited period or till the trial is over. if so what is the time limit I mean how many months will they receive the 50 percent salary.
Answer: If the person is booked in criminal case than upto 180 days he or she will receive the 50% of salary if inquiry continues after that period for no fault of that employee than he or she is eligible for 75 % of salary.
If I Am right than tell me as per section the above mentions says.
Pls tell me the meaning of gartitutous act & non - gartitutous act.
Meaning of statutory tenancy & contractual tenancy. Also difference between them possible with the help of a example(S).
THnaking u all experts in advance.
Suchitra. S
13 June 2010 at 18:05
Respected experts, Please let me know if there is any SC judgment which say that the holder of special/general POA cannot give evidence in the Court. One of the NRIs have gvn special POA and now as he is not there in India, can the holder of POA give evidence on his behalf or not.
AMAR RANU
13 June 2010 at 15:39
Dear friends,
The text of the following P/H High Court judgment is not being downloaded from the website of P/H High Court due to server problems and the same is not being rectified by the concerned authorities for the last over 6 months.
I would be grateful if some concerned and proactive personage in Chandigarh or elsewhere would be able to send it in word or pdf format by email to ranuam@yahoo.com
The Judgments/Orders for the case CWP--10569/2008 :
Sl.No. Case Number Date of Judgment/Order Title
1. CWP--10569/2008 04/11/2008 M/s Kohinoor Seeds Fields India Pvt. Ltd.
Vs.
State of Punjab and others
Sincerely yours,
Amar Ranu
Anonymous
13 June 2010 at 14:59
Sir,
Can suit for malicious prosecution be filed after 4 yrs of pronouncement of judgment. Within a year we had served legal notice to the oppo. Party, he took/asked some time to negotiate. In the mean time my wife become seriously ill due to liver disease and for that we had to go outside for her treatment. Unfortunately she died. After that we lost control over us. I too is a retired doctor aged about 78 yrs suffered a lot due to illness. Due to these reason we failed to pursue it further. We have strong case.
Can we resend legal notice? What is the exact procedure, if my son will be acting on my behalf?
Thanks to all
SOURABH JAIN
13 June 2010 at 11:36
WHETHER THE TEACHERS ARE COVERED UNDER ESIC ?
IF YES, UNDER WHAT ACT OR DEFINATION ?
IF THERE IS ANY JUDGEMENT OF ANY COURT WHERE IT IS HELD THAT TEACHERS ARE COVERED UNDER ESIC ?
WHETER TEACHERS ARE WORKMAN ?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Whom adoption is legally valid.
Respected Experts,
Here is a complicated issue, which I am placing for ur valuable suggestion. Plz. Suggest me suitably.
A filed a suit in the year 2003 against B for declaration to declare him as an adopted son of late C. To prove his case, “A” filed his School records stating that C is his father. Now the age of A is 58 years.
On the other hand, B is denying the plea of A and contending that he was the original adopted son of late “C” and filed (1) Registered Adoption deed duly signed and executed by “C” in the year 1985 (2) Gazette Notification in the year 1985 (3) And mutation proceedings in the year 1989 and the Revenue Records stands in his name.
As per the contention of B, though “A” was with “C” for some time at his early age, there was no registration of an adoption deed etc., as like as “B” and further contended that he was absconded for more than 10 to 15 years prior to death of wife of C. C’s wife died in the year 1984 and C died in the year 1997. After the death of C’s wife, C was with B till his death. Due to love and affection on “B”, both C and his wife have taken him as adopted son and performed all the formalities as per the Hindu caste custom. Now the case is pending before the court. In this Now
1. I want to know at this juncture, whose plea is to be accepted by the court.
2. What is the procedure generally the courts followed, in case of adoptions.