pratik
16 July 2010 at 22:37
A Joint Hindu Family consisted of father (as Karta) and his son, a minor, as coparcener. The father was declared insolvent in 1947. The official receiver sold the entire property of the J.H.F. including the share of the son. Is the sale of son’s share valid? Without the premission of the court ?
Pls tell me pls
Thanks In Advance.
pratik
16 July 2010 at 22:34
Meaning of Repeals.- Repeals. Rep. by the Repealing Act, 1927 (12 of 1927), s. 2 and Sch. If it is given under any act.
WHY Repealing Act, 1927 is written becasue i have not found any act like this under any site including the google.
Indain Sucession Act, 1925.
Setion 386. Validation of certain payments made in good faith to holder of invalid certificate.- Where a certificate under this Part has been superseded or is invalid by reason of the certificate having been revoked under section 383, or by reason of the grant of a certificate to a person named in an appellate order under section 384, or by reason of a certificate having been previously granted, or for any other cause, all payments made or dealings had, as regards debts and securities specified in the superseded or invalid certificate, to or with the holder of that certificate in ignorance of its supersession or invalidity, shall be held good against claims under any other certificate.
What do u mean by shall be held good against claims under any other certificate ?
Thanks In Advance.
pratik
16 July 2010 at 22:12
1)Whether Nationalised bank covers The "Right To Information" Act or not. Whether any information regarding our loan account can be asked to nationalised bank under Right to Information act or not ?
Indian Succession Act, 1925.
2)Under Which Section it has been said that when a judge is transferred he should make over the key of safe(in which original wills are kept)& the teasure's receipt for the duplicate to his successor's and record that he has done so on transfer of charge papers sent ot the high court.
T Nandakumar
16 July 2010 at 19:52
We live in a street that has only 6 houses. People living in the adjoining street (not part of the same layout) create nuisance by playing cricket, sending a group of children for playing games in our street. They create nuisance in front of our houses and refuse to leave. Besides, vehicles are parked haphazardly and the road in front of our houses is used for dumping debris and construction materials. We cannot live peacefully in our own house. I would like to know the legal remedies available to find a permanent soluton to this vexing problem
M. PIRAVI PERUMAL
16 July 2010 at 17:25
My client has obtained a decree and judgement for permanent injunction in his favour against the district administration not to demolish the structure. But, the government officials has demolished the structure in violation of court decree and judgement. Now what action can be taken against the government officials ?
gopalaswamyb
16 July 2010 at 16:07
In two cases filed by my brother as petioner and me as respondant, requesting the court for letter of administration ( probating a registered will, testator died in 1991 applied for administration in 2007) I sumited the will to the court on their directive. no one contested. I applied for information to the court. i found from the web that these two cases were disposed.Does it mean that the letter of administration issued
What is meant by disposed i have not received any reply from the court nor any information from the web i found that
My brother has filed another case in the name of my father who left the will and deceased in 2007 the web indicates as pending.till date the petioner is silent and i have received any communication
I would like to sell this property
There is no stay from the court, the will is in the court. how to sell this property.am i not eligible to know as respondent the results of these cases
ABHISHEK
16 July 2010 at 15:30
I have been issued the show cause notice from the court as the credit card issuer bank named KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK filed the civil case for recovery under section 9 of ARBITRATION & CONCILIATION ACT 1996read with section 151 of code of civil procedure,1908..
The case was filed on 14th JULY 2010 by the BANK & the date of hearing is on 17th JULY 2010..?/
The notice has been served on 16th JULY 2010 to me mischieviously/intentionally by the bank..??
Should I appear in the court tomorrow or not ?
Does the case regarding the recovery of credit card dues be filed under the above mentioned act and if so then how should I argue/or present in the court to DEFEND myself as I am under financial crisis and there fore I need 2 years time from the court to repay the outstanding of the credit card.??
PLS. HELP as the date of hearing is tomorrow and I am under depression.
Anonymous
16 July 2010 at 12:09
Can an appeal be filed against an order to the divsion bench during the pendency of contempt on the same matter??
S RAJAKUMAR
16 July 2010 at 08:26
A person signed a promissory note and issued a cheque. Promissory note is not dated and the corructions made in the promissory note is not signed for corrections made. The cheque is not presented in the bank. The opposite party went for a money suit. What is the remedy for the executor of promissory note which is a forged one.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
impleadment
I have a request to you. Could anyone please send me the format in which application to impleadment is submitted in a high court along with the memorandum ? I m a law student working upon the topic. I want to have an idea as to how the cover page looks.
thanks