Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

anshul sangal   13 September 2010 at 13:03

Content of notice

Sir i want to know how to write a notice to defendant in civil suit?
What are the content of notice?

Anonymous   13 September 2010 at 11:51

defemation

on completion of my LL.B three years course my parents throw a party at my home. iam the first ll.b degree holder at my village. one of my neighbour in drunk mood/or pretending to be..called my father a dog and me a "kuttey ki aaulad" an also said that "i can buy as many as advocates what is your value" in a full packed party.sir/madam i want to file a defemation case for me and my father. is this matter a ground for me to file a defemation case

Anonymous   13 September 2010 at 11:48

LIMITATION ACT

I AM HAVING ONE SHOP IN REGD. CO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY SINCE 1991,I HAVE PAID ALL MAINT. CHARGES DEMANDED BY SOCIETY TILL MARCH 2005.I HAVE PAID 2 YEARS(1999-2000 & 2001)TO SOCIETY ,AS PER VERBAL REQUEST BY TREASURER OF THE SOCIETY & ONWARDS FOR 4 YEARS DIRECT TO MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & SUBMITTED DETAILS TO SOCIETY.IN JUNE 2005 SOCIETY ISSUED ME A BILL DEMANDING PROPERTY TAX FOR 12 YEARS i.e.
(1991 TO 2003)AT DOUBLE THE ACTUAL TAX+ INTEREST.
PLEASE GUIDE ME WHETHER LIMITATION ACT APPLY OR NOT TO MY CASE. IS THERE ANY RULING IN SIMILAR CASE, PLEASE GIVE ME THE REFERENCE.

GOPI KRISHNA   13 September 2010 at 10:09

rejection of plaint

Dear Sir

please provide me latest SC/HC judgement on Sec 34 of Securitisation Act which bars the civil courts to entertain any suits or proceedings in respect of matter which a Debt Recovery Tribunal or the Appellate Tribunal is empowered by or under the Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002

s.loganathan   12 September 2010 at 22:12

Privileged and Confidential Information.

Is everything and anything pertaining to opinion on a case discussed with a Lawyer, considered as Privileged and Confidential Information? What if that advise is against the law, such as "You will not win your case if you tell the truth, you can only win if you lie, even if you have merits". Will the scope of Privileged and Confidential Information still shield him?

Anonymous   12 September 2010 at 20:12

WHAT IS DOCTRINE OF ELECTION IN RESPECT OF A WILLDE

DEAR SIR,

WHAT IS DOCTRINE OF ELECTION WHEN WE SPEAK OF A WILL

KINDLY ENABORATE

VK SEP 12,10

Anonymous   12 September 2010 at 18:35

CAN AN ISSUE BE RAISED OUTSIDE THE CONTENTS AND SPIRIT OF A WILL

dear sir,

the will of my mother which has been probated by the delhi high court clearly states that a certain house property no 1 in which she was living at lucknow shall pass on to me.

by the same will she passed on the second floor of another property at delhi, property no 2 to me.

my brother has encroached on my property no 2 at delhi.

He has apart from taking share willed to him,first floor of property no 2,also encroached on second floor of property no 2 at delhi which belongs to me.

he states that after death of mother, lies of course, that there was an oral family settlment whereby he was given my share second floor in property no 2 for relinquishing his right in property no 1 at lucknow.

as stated earlier the property no 1 at lucknow is also willed to me under the will.
my query is :-

since both properties, house at lko, proeprty no 1 and second floor of house at delhi property no 2 are willed to me where does the question of my brother arise in property no 1.

query

HOW DO I ENSURE THAT THE HIGH COURT AT DELHI WHERE I HAVE FILED FOR POSSESSION DISMISSES THIS CONTENTION OUTRIGHT AS THE WILL CLEARLY STATES THAT I AM THE BEHEFICIARY SOLE OF PROPERTY NO 1 AT LUCKNOW AND DOES NOT ALLOW THIS ONLY ISSUE OF MY BROTHER TO BE A PART OF THE ISSUES FRAMED.?

WHY AT ALL SHOULD THIS BE AN ISSUE WHEN THE WILL IS CLEAR ON ALL COUNTS.

THE WILL IS SACRED.

CAN IT BE SUBJECT TO INTERPREATION WHEN IT IS CRYSTAL CLEAR FROM THE WILL THE INTENTIONS OF THE TESTATOR?\

REGARDS VINAY KALA SEP 12,10



Goutam   12 September 2010 at 13:28

Plz give ur valuable advice

My problem:-
1.(I have a property which is related with wakf board(under the control of wakf board.) This property is given to me by wakf board on lease deed,and on rent

2.I am paying the rent of this property on due time.I have occupied this property since 1950(1960). And occupy some other property which is also related to wakf board property since 2005. The property which is occupied by me since 2005 is the property of another person. I have purchased that property from that person and changed the name of the property holder. Now this property is on my name and lease deed is done by wakf board in favour of me.

3.Now i want to become the owner of this property and want to purchase the property from the wakf board.

4. I am using that both property for business or residential purpose. One property is using for business purpose now and other property is not used by me for any purpose from a long time now it is vacant.

pl z tell:-

1.Is there is any provision under the wakf board act for the purchasing of the property by me and any authority under which the member of Wakf Board can sale the wakf board property.

2.Can u explain the procedure under which the wakf board levy rent on the property. I am asking this question because they(Members of wakf board) levy rent on their own discretion.Every time when rent is paid by me after a definite period, they have refused to accept the rent, and told me that now the rate of rent is increased, and told that we can accept the rent only in that condition when i(lease owner) agree to pay the rent on increased amount.


3.If i told (or ask) them directly for the purchasing of the property,i think that they have demanded for a lot of bribe.

Anonymous   12 September 2010 at 13:10

securitisation act

Bank auctioned the property but DRAT STAYED TO CONFIRM THE AUCTION BIDDER. In the meantime before confirm AUCTION if the defendents paid the entire due AUCTION canelled? The defendents have right ontheir property?
2) The property worth Rs. 6 crores Due to bank amount Rs. 22lakhs. Can bank auctioned the entire property? OR the bank auctioned to their extent of debt? AS
per AIR1997SC2106 i heard verdit as the bank have right to auction to the extent of their debt, not the entire property? Is it correct? PLS waiting your valuable replies and suggestions and citations if any
than Q

R.Ranganathan   12 September 2010 at 13:01

Compensation and Damages

Can anyone provide me with any case relating to cheque misplaced by Bank and not traceable. Or else provide me with the decision in the following case

8 Vipin Bhardwaj vs. Citi Bank, I (1999) C.P.J. 522 (Delhi S.C.D.R.C.).