Anonymous
20 September 2010 at 21:29
Respected Experts,
I have filed the Contempt Petition against my organisation for non-implementation of the Order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal passed by the Principal Bench which has been directed to implement it with in 3 months.The Contempt petition was admitted and issued notices to the contemnors where personal appearance was exempted . Therafter the Organisation has blocked my salary Then I filed the Miscellaneous Application , the CAT has given orders to file the reply with in one week time in response to contempt Petition and Miscellaneous Application
Today the hearing was done , the counsel of the contemnors has stated before the bench that they will now going to file the Writ Petition before the High Court which infuriated the Hon'ble Bench and has issued directions that the contemnors has planned to file the Writ Petition after the expiry period and has summoned the chief of organisation to appear personally before the Bench
My queries are:
1 Whether I should wait for contempt proceedings for the implememtataion of the order?
2 Whether I should filed the caveat Application before the Hon'ble High Court under the provisions of the CPC?
3 Whether I should filed for the certify order of the CAT and filed the another Contempt Petition before the Bench?
4 Since order has been passed 6 months ago whether Writ Petition against the Order is manatainable as the W.P may be Time barred?
Anonymous
20 September 2010 at 20:25
FIR is not telling about the vehicle which hit the Scooter. Pillion rider died.How to add the Vehicle.In FIR Vehicle name is not mentioned. But Ridder knows the vehicle owner.
Anonymous
20 September 2010 at 20:20
How the Orphans and street person come under present enumeration ?
Nagaraj
20 September 2010 at 19:23
our case already chief examination by the plaintiff alon with marked the documents and after another GPa holder of plaintiff will come to for face cross exaimination. it is correct or not please guide me
Anonymous
20 September 2010 at 18:21
sir I am tenant i have filed a suit against the owner property during pendency of the suit the owner has disposed the property to third party. Now the third party and person who sold the party has issued a notice under t.p act and filed a suit for evictionNow my question is can the original owner can dispose of the property when I filed a suit for injunction and can the person who disposed the property can isuue a notice with the person who has purchased the property and file a suit for eviction what are apex court judgements in this regard.I would like one more point when I have filed a rejection of plaint the said petition is numbered s.r and no I.A Number is given to this petition this petition is filed some 2 years back what remedy ihave got now
Anonymous
20 September 2010 at 12:40
dear sirs,
i posted many doubt in this site, i got your valuable suggestions . thanks.
My grandmom has four children, 2 sons and 2 daughters .in 2 sons , one son is no contact with my grandmom and he is not taken care of her for past 15 years. and another son , we dont know about him where he is for past 10 years...
my mom[ grandmom's first daughter]and grandmom are staying altogether. grandmom's second daughter staying near to us. two years before my grandmom gifted her house[self owned property] to my mom and me[grandson], it is unconditional gift deed. after that we changed eb name and house tax name to our name.
Two month back, my grandmom cancelled the gift deed which was gifted to us.and she saying that she going to sell the house.
1.i consulted to document writers but they saying she can cancel the gift deed.
2.grandmom cancelled the gift deed,incase she expire what will happen to property gifted to us ?
3.Legal heirs is necessary to sell the property which was gifted to us, after my grandmom expires[ she cancelled the gift deed]
4.somebody saying that all the grandsons has rights to claim the grandmom property, because she cancelled the gift deed.
Kindly clarify all the points i mentioned above. and also explain the steps to be taken to protect the property which was gifted to us.Thanks in advance
Chetan
20 September 2010 at 10:44
That the suit for Recovery has been dismissed in default on 28/06/2010, whereas the advocate did not appear in it.
How to restore the present suit ?
Pls provide provision and citation
What is the limitation to restore the suit ?
yogesh
20 September 2010 at 00:07
Dear Experts,
I have filed the civil petition before the Hon'ble ADJ in the month of May 2010 which has issued the notice to the respondents by paying PF/RC through the process server and the next date of hearing was fixed in the last week of the sept 2010 where the respondent has been summoned to appear before the court
As per CPC Amendment Rule 2002 , Order VIII of the CPC has been ammended which has ststed that the repondent has to file the W.S(Written Statement) within 30 days and in no case it should be extend more than 90 days from the date of received of the summon
My Query is since more than 120 days have already been passed and defendant has to make the appearance on the due date Whether I can file separate application under Order VIII Rule 9 of the CPC to pass an order as an ex-parte so that same may be listed on the date of hearing as the defendant has not file or failed to file the W.S on the due date?
2 Whether court can go against the provisons of the CPC by extending it more time to file the W.S?
Regards
Chetan
19 September 2010 at 21:23
That the grandfather of X is a adopted son. The grandfather had 3 sons & 2 daughters. The grandfather had executed the will in favour of 3 sons of his self acquired & ancestral property in the year 1987. Now the 2 daughters had demanded a share in that property Whether the daughters are entitled for the same ?
What is the limitation to file suit for partition ?
From which date the period is to be computed ?
Pls guide
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
T.P.Act
whether by Regd. Deed of Relinquishment title will pass or not. please reply with some decision of S.C