Advocate.S.A.Siddiq
24 November 2010 at 16:38
In a muslim natural parents ( H & W) wants to setaside the expartee order of guardianship passed by the District court.
What is the right proceedure to setaside the expartee order ? And claim their chid from adopted parents ?
Anonymous
24 November 2010 at 13:57
i have filed divorce on the basis of Desertion now the Judge has ruled it in the favour of the Expaite i would like to know wht does it meane and wht is the steps and how long is the procidure going to take
pratik
24 November 2010 at 12:46
1) As Per section 70 of the indian contract act, 1872 & after reading the maxim qantum merit. I have the case law of the supreme court in years between 1965 to 1980 that as per government act, 1935 section 173(6) if the agreement is void than also the maxim mention above & section 70 of the indian contract act, 1872 is applicable but i need the case law of the SC if any Which says that if the agreement is void, than also the above mentiond maxim & section 70 of the indian contract act, 1872 is applicable.
So pls address me the abovementioned query case law(S). in word format or in pdf & not the citation the hole case law(S) pls.
2) As I have seen that in any court or tribunal if the stamp paper is used in any proceding for any matter than it has been said that at the backside of the stamp paper we can't write because it is not valid they say that only the front side is only valid so don't use the back portion of the stamp paper for any use. If used it is void or illegal. So i need a case laws of any high court or SC that the above mentioned points are wrong & we can use the back side portion of the stamp paper for the any use in any tribunal or any court.
Thanks in advance.
raghavendra
24 November 2010 at 11:37
sir,
how KHB, BDA ,allotting the sites to the peoples
how can we register our name
before the advertisement can it possible toregister the name in BDA or KHB,pls inform me
thaks
Tarun Thakur
24 November 2010 at 08:19
A executed a registered GPA in favour of B. in that GPA power to manage the property and sale were specifically given.
B entered into agreement to sale with C for the sale of property in his own capacity citing himself to be the owner of property. C knew the fact that B was GPA holder.
thereafter B denied to execute sale deed.
C filed a civil suit for specific performance against B. The trial Court decreed the suit holding that C has proved the agreement to sell and receipt of money by B.
Lower appellate court reversed its findings that B was GPA holder and A ( original owner ) was to be impleaded.
and allowed the appeal and dismissed the suit.
In RSA HIghcourt, there is a substantial question of law that whether A the original owner was to be impleaded as necessary party ?
i am representing C . Please give views and judgment in my favour.
Anonymous
23 November 2010 at 20:12
Properties situated in different district and also in two states. Whether partition suit can file in one state or two partition want to file to get the share from two state? Thank you.
rajeshtanku
23 November 2010 at 19:17
Dear experts,
Iam in urgent need of your valuble suggestion in respect of R.C.C.
Sirs
In eviction petition resp No 1 has contested and resp No:2 has been set experte and finally exparte decree has been passed by the officer.
resp No:2 has filed the petition for setting aside the exparte decree with in time,which was returned by the officer by endorsing "how this petition is maintainable when the case is decided on merits".Again the petition was filed by representing that the decree was passed on merits only against resp No:1 but not resp No:2 as resp No:2 was set exparte.
My humble request to all experts to help by quoting the decisions on order 18(3)of R.C.C ACT OF ANDHRAPRADESH OR any other decisions through which the petition would be numbered .
G V Triveni Prasad
23 November 2010 at 19:17
I was reading the Experyts views on the matter and want further clarification
In my case it was a public sector bank which has quoted some OS no while making out a claim agains me which was proved by documentary evidence as false and was accepted by judge so.
my question is hwter I have to intiate the action against the Bnak u/s 340 Cr.P.C. or was it for the Judge on observation to permit the action under the section
Anonymous
23 November 2010 at 19:10
What is the time frame within which the petitioner, who has won an ex parte decree to realise a sum of money from a firm, can file for execution of that ex parte decree? Experts...Please reply early.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
clarification of judgment
how is a review petition different from an application for clarification/modification of judgment?
Can we reargue the matter in an aplication for clarification?