Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Anonymous   28 November 2010 at 12:55

why bail is required in simple fight cases

my landlord had fight with another house owner in front of our house. I was not there. In night when i reach to home, landlord-lady son asked me to help for the bail for Landlady in relevant police station. i went to police station with them, they asked my details and photo id card. i asked them the kind of case it is, but they didnot tell anything.
i also signed on some booklet.
will i be in some trouble if they case goes to court.

surendrababu   28 November 2010 at 12:12

Can a person cite a already married woman as his wife

Three brothers got property under a will of their father. They have partitioned the property into three equal shares.

1.Elder Brother married and begot two sons thereafter he died.

2.2nd and 3rd brothers remained unmarried and living jointly under one roof.

3.The unmarried 2nd brother had illegal contact with a married woman. During that course and while she was living with her husband, the unmarried 2nd brother gave a house to that women under a registered settlement deed on 5th January 2010 wherein he referred her as his wife after that he died of hanging intestate on 30th January 2010.

4.The aforesaid woman sold that house to some other person on 3rd March 2010

5.She has taken divorce from her husband on 5th June 2010.

6.The unmarried 3rd brother while trying to file a suit against that woman and the person who purchased that house died of hanging intestate on 3rd September 2010.

7.What is the legal position of the children of the first brother?

8.Can a person cite a woman as his wife while that woman is already married and living with her husband?

9.Is that settlement deed valid?

What are the solutions remain to the children of first brother.

Rajiv Lall   28 November 2010 at 09:23

Armed Forces Tribunal Act 2007

Is there any ruling by any Court (incl. SC) that Secs. 30 & 31 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act 2007 are ultra vires or unconstitutional?
Any citations that can be referred to?
A response ASAP will be much appreciated.
Thanks.

lalit   27 November 2010 at 23:29

Exhibit of document without calling an authorized witnesses

In Lower court opposite counsel stud as plaintiff and had Exhibit a demarcation report without calling a authorized witnesses
i,e ( girdawa ) plaintiffs counsel exhibited that document in his rebuttal evidence .
Now in appeal suggest me how can i plead in court with some better ruling / citation or law for that ........

Anonymous   27 November 2010 at 17:05

Your Opinion (Matter in regards to Limitation)

Dear Sir,
Few days back I sought help which was very useful
The High Court has remanded my matter which I won in the CAT for deciding the issue of Limitation

The respondent has stated that issue of select panel and appointment relates to 2001 & 2002 and cannot be agitated in year 2009 as it barred by Limitation

While, I stated that respondents have themselves on the fault for not notifying the result and has kept my candidature in dark.Its only by the way of RTI application, I came to know about the status of result which was finally replied in year 2008 and I have made my application with in the period of one year and hence not time barred

Kindly provide your opinion Whether my previous order will be uphold or dismissed?

Anonymous   27 November 2010 at 13:57

Disproportionate assets to known source of income

If High court Justice or Supreme Court Justice have assets disproportionate to their known source of income. They may be impeached by parliament that all know. Whether they are liable for criminal prosecution by way of private complaint under section 200 crpc

harivanshsai   27 November 2010 at 13:47

Clarification of judgment

The application before CAt was dismissed as time barred without going into the merits of the case.
An appeal against the order of CAT was filed and it was dismissed in connection with another petition which was filed against an entirely different order of CAT.
Surprisingly the order challenged by first person was held to be wrong inside the common judgment but ultimately it was dismissed in final para of judgment.

Can I seek a clarification/modification of judgment by court through an application as to what is the status of Impugned order, whether these are set aside or held and what is status of the O.A. filed before CAT
whether it had been adjucated on merits by high court or maintained or dismissed ?

harivanshsai   27 November 2010 at 13:38

review petition

A judgment was passed by high court on the ground of some false documents which were submitted by hand at the time while the judgment was being rerserved and judgment was not postponed.
Ultimately the judgment was solely founded over these false documents, which were not supported by any affidavit.
Can we still move a review petition pointing out the irregularities committed in the case?

Anonymous   27 November 2010 at 13:37

Change of Bench

Hi Experts,
If the client is not satisfied with the Judgement or injustice done to the case, can a person (client) request for a change of the bench while reviewing the case again. Please advice me is there's any such law. Your advice shall be very highly appreciated.
Regards,
Rizwan Shaikh

Member (Account Deleted)   27 November 2010 at 13:33

review petition

Can a review petition be held maintained on the ground of misconception of law or facts by court, if we point out the same as held by supreme court in "Board of Control of Cricket of India Vs Netaji Cricket Club, AIR SC 592?