raghavendra
15 July 2011 at 18:22
sir,
what is hte legal meaning of gramatana site ,
what is the differance between gramthan site and BDA and BMRD sites.
can i puchase the revenue land , land owner saying only B katha is possible , is B katha is good title ?
RAMGOPAL CHOUDHARY,ADVOCATE
15 July 2011 at 13:38
Through an Affidavit state the same,published in local daily News paper and same will fulfill normal requirement of your minor but for legal purpose you have to notified in the Gazette. Opinion by Ramgopal Choudhary,Advocate,User name-advocate.rgc@gmail.com
Shan
15 July 2011 at 12:31
I have entered into an agreement to sell with my uncle few days back to purchase his share,the property which is jointly owned by my father(2/3) & my uncle(1/3), giving him some advance & taking time to pay the remaining amount within three months now i want to pay few more amount from the total amount, my question is that whether i ve to take reieving on a reciept with revenue stamp affix on it or on the same agreement?
Kindly help plzz....
regards...
Satya Brata Dutta
14 July 2011 at 11:42
That due to false statement of address the defence struck off of the Opp.Party in a misc case Ord39 rule 2A,no appeal preffered, is there any right to make argument in a petition of ord 11 rule 21?
Further is there any right to lead evidence in the case?
More than 4 years has been passed they did not prefer appeal,is there any right to prefer any appeal before high court on another interloqutory petition arising out in the same misc Case?
mahesan
08 July 2011 at 22:13
Daughter filed suit partition against father and sisters and two brothers. Exparte decree passed and 1/5 th share was alloted to daughter in the year of 1997.
After 15 yers back daugherprepared to file the final decree application for divion of 1/5 shares. Meanwhile the father is died. How can enlarge the father share in the final decree application. What is the provision of Supplement preliminary decree. Now mother is legal heir of father and how can she add the final decree application and mother is what entitled share in the father's share. Impleading petition is necessary or not.
other wise daughter is entitled to file the final decree application without supplementary prelimnary dcree or not ?
Give me detailed expalanation, properties situated in tamilnadu
I expect the answer from Mr. R. Ramachandran and other expert
nita nath
07 July 2011 at 17:06
CAN MAHARASHTRA REVENUE TRIBUNAL REMAND BACK THE MATTER TO THE LOWER COURT IN REVISIONARY JURISDICTION FOR LEADING FRESH EVIDENCE
Abhilash
30 June 2011 at 11:34
Bhishop House (registered Society act)is the Owner of property
This Property sell to other person this societies Genaral boby resolution.
this genaral body is appoint to Fr.Roy (father of Church under working of above said society)
Minites book and resolution as following
To authorize father roy to sell the property kottathara village Sf No.63/4
minits book signed all member's and Bhishop of above said Society
now bishop in gulf who is the sign above said properties documents
biju s
28 June 2011 at 22:53
Dear Sir,
Let me brief our case history we have joined in Air & Doodarshan in the year 2000 as Engineering Assistant in the pay scale of Rs 5000-150-8000. After joining it came know that those people who joined before 25/2/1999 are enjoying the higher scale of 6500-200-10500 even though the qualification ,recruitment rules , designation , nature of work , the value judgement,responsibilities,reliability,functinalneed etc are same but for this cut off date . That means we are denied the higher scale due to this cut off date only .
We went in the Honble Delhi CAT raising Equal Pay for Equal Job and got a favourable verdict in 2006. But instead of implementing CAT verdict the Govt went for review which was dismissed in the admission stage itself . Then the Govt moved 2 the Honble Delhi H C against the CAT verdict where the High Court dismissed the appeal directing the Govt to implement the CAT Verdict in 2010. Next the Govt moved to Honble S C against the Delhi High Court verdict . Here also govt stand was rejected by the Apex Court in the first hearing itself favouring the employees. The verdict was out on 14th Jan 2011 and almost 6 months has been passed .Till date the verdict is not implemented.
We got filed a contempt Petition and the hearing is on 19th July2011.
Now it is understood that the Govt is planning to file a review petion in the Apex court and also planning to withdraw the agreement of 25/2/99 which offers higher scale to the incumbent employees only and lower scale to those who joined after the so called cut off date.
My query is WHETHER IT IS POSSIBLE TO FILE A REVIEW PETITION AFTER SUCH A LONG PERIOD.
WHETHER GOVT CAN TABLE NEW REASONS TO DENY HIGHER SCALE ,WHICH HAS BEEN CREATED AFTER THE APEX COURT VERDICT ie AFTER 14th JAN 2011 AND WERE NOT IN THE SCENARIO DURING THE TIME OF EARLIER ARGUMENTS
Pls Reply
Sanjeevappa. L
28 June 2011 at 19:10
under what provision the court fee for HRC case in Karnataka to be paid. Please advise me, matter is very urgent
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Serving of notice under writ petition- Delhi High Court
Respected Mmebers
I am planning to file writ Petition at Delhi High Court(DHC) in which Director of Organaisation is the party and one is the PVT Respondent working its organisation
In DHC rules , the petitioner have to serve 2 copies of the standing cousel of the organisation which has its chamber in DHC which the person has to serve prior to filing in the Registry
Therafter, the matter is posted for hearing.In CASE MY MATTER IS ADMITTED BEFORE HIGH COURT then notices will be issued
My query is in reference to therafter:
It means I will have to service the copy to the Director as well as the Pvt Respondent or it will be serviced by the court itself through process service?
How much copies I will have to serve for Director and Pvt Respondent and fees payable through Court Fees stamp?
Whether I will have to attach the envelope for process service or the covering form of the process fees will be sufficient?