MANJUNATHA REDDY G
07 January 2015 at 13:42
My Grand father acquired 3 acres of Agricultural land in 1967, as it is self acquired property, the same was transferred to my father on the basis of WILL in 2000. The revenue records were in the name of my Grand father untill 2010. The katha was transferred in 2011 in favor of my father.
My brother filed a partition suit and accordingly the land was dived between us 1 acre each i.e father, brother and myself. We registered the Compromise decree in the sub registrar in 2013. we applied for transfer of the Katha in our favour. Meanwhile my cousins filed the partition suit and give an objection letter before the Tahasildar, for change of Katha(pahani). Summons was issued and after hearing he states that, the tahsildar can not mutate the registrar and tranfer the katha as there is civil suit pending. Pl let us know how to over come this problem. Pahani should be transferred based on decree passed in our family suit as well as based on the registration of the same decree. There is no stay in the civil suit filed by our cousins. How can Tahasildar stop the Katha is it not a contempt of court. pl advise.
sudhi raj f
30 December 2013 at 11:33
Dear Sir,
Land Occupant had sold the land to Third party without intimating the "Other Rights holders of the said property. Now the Third party name appears in Form I&XIV.
Mutation of the land also completed without intimating the Other rights owners.
Please advise what action to be taken.
Regards,
Suraj
Prakash S. B.
23 August 2013 at 08:18
Our Housing Society has not yet adopted the new By-laws, as amended under the 97th Constitutional Amendment?
(1) Whether the said new By-laws have become operational, effective and mandatory? If so, from which date?
(2) In the circumstances stated above, whether 1/5th members of the Society should submit a requisition in writing to the Secretary / Chairman of the Society to call a Special General Meeting for adoption of the said new By-laws?
Prakash S. B.
22 August 2013 at 22:46
(1) When an Annual General Meeting is postponed, whether a Co-operative Housing Society can circumvent the provisions of Rule 60(8) of the M.C.S. Rules, 1961, read with By-law 103 and call a Special General Body Meeting instead of calling the postponed Annual General Meeting as per Rule 60(8) of the M.C.S. Rules, 1961, read with By-law 103 for passing the accounts of the Society for a given financial year after the expiry of the period stipulated under the said Rule 60(8)and By-law 103 and also pass the accounts in that Special General Body Meeting after the expiry of the period stipulated under the said Rule 60(8)and By-law 103?
(2) Whether Sections 75(1), 75(4) and 75(5) of the M.C.S. Act, 1960, are attracted if the postponed annual general meeting is not called and held within the period of 30 days as prescribed and envisaged under the said Rule 60(8) read with By-law 103 and accounts are not passed within the said period of 30 days?
(3) When an Annual General Meeting has to be postponed as business in respect of two items could not be transacted, whether one of the two items (of which notice was given to members) can be deleted / excluded from the agenda of the postponed Annual General Meeting or from the agenda of the Special General Body Meeting referred to herein above?
(4) Whether a Special General Body Meeting can be called by the Chairman and / or by a majority of the Committee on their own i.e. in the absence of a written requisition of 1/5th of its members or if it is not called at the instance of the Registrar or the Housing Federation of which it is a member, as envisaged under Section 76(1)of the M.C.S. Act, 1960?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Vacant land purchase
Respected Sir,
My Father(Expired) and my uncle ( stil alive) had purchased a land 12 kathas and got registered 6 kathas each in their name respectively and this land falls in 2 dags.They had amicably divided their plot between each other and that divided plot was not registered with a demarcation site plan but a site plan made by both of them in a plane paper and signed accordingly,but finally this site plan was not registered.Now my uncle wants to sell their some vacant land by dividing two parts,one part falls immediately in-front of our ( father's part) main entrance of our ( father's) building which around 1/2 kathas. I have offered them to give us that small part with current market price, but my uncle does not want to sell that 1/2 kathas to us. Now please let me know is there any proceeding which can give that small part 1/2 kathas with current market price? Please advice sir.
Thanking you
M.Bhattacharya