can a widow remarriage has share in first husband property?
since that lady has no child with 1st husband.
she remarried and pregnant now.
Anonymous
03 February 2018 at 18:04
Plaintiff files a suit for recovery against defendant no.1, 2 &3 and def no. 1 is only a freight and forwarding agent appointed by defendant no. 2 and the plaintiff made the goods for defendant no. 3 which is out of country. Now whats the remedy with defendant no. 1. The def no. 1 only got Rs 15000/- and now he is claiming Rs 60 lacs from the defendant. The goods were delivered to def no. 3 and he did not make the payments.
Does multimodal transport act come into picture?
Harish M
03 February 2018 at 11:12
Sir:
I want to file case on college.
Facts:
I joined 3 year BBM course. Paid fees plus donation total 4 lakhs. But classes did not start at all even after 6 months. I have complained to university in writing. But no reply from them.
College principal asking me to pay rest of fees if I want to continue or asking me to simply leave.
I have paid money by taking education loan.
So in this case which court to approach in order to get my money back.
I have enquired few people did researching in internet. I got information about consumer court. So I visited consumer court to see how things go about there.
I heard judge telling do you keep vakil to many people who were inside court hall.
Is keeping vakil necessary?
If not consumer court which other court to go and ask relief?
Under which section to file case and which court I should go, asking for refund of fees can anyone guide?
PS: Another problem is my markscards of 12th are with the college. If I do case, will they give my markscard back?
Please help.
a muslim lady got married with a muslim got 1 male 1 female children. her father and mother are alive. she is the only daughter to them. She simply converted in to Hinduism got married with a Hindu man. She obtained promissory note loan from a bank for her tailoring business. bank filed money suit for recovery. before starting trial she passed away. Against whom the bank will take action as legal heir of the died lady.
When, I was 6yrs old minor (1986), my father purchased property in my favour through the legal documents Deed of Agreement for Sale, GPA & payment Receipt, these are all documents registered with Sub-Registrar-IV office Delhi. We have used physically this property for 3yrs. & due to lack of facility of hospital,school & electricity we have shifted another property in delhi. From 1989 to 1997 father visited at regular interval.
Suddenly our neighbor (trespasser) who have vacant land in same size attached with my suit property has claimed ownership on behalf of forged documents. My father has filed suit for permanent injunction agt. him at Tiz Hazari Court,Delhi in 1997 as my legal guardian.In 2002 Sr.Civil Judge has passed decree that " File suit for possession agt defendant & do not dispossession without legal procedure" .
My father was not much aware of law & our advocate not disclosed important point. After long lasting legal fight in court my father very disturbed & also suffers economically due to lost his job. Before starting to this limitation time period Defendant (trespasser ) has expired/dead.
All above over view, my questions are:-
(1) If defendant has passed away (death) before limitation period, then after we should be liable to filed suit for possession.
(2) This is vacant property with locked due to Defendant was damaged our structure of house & his family members never used this property physically .
(3) Defendant family members can claim this property against Adverse Possession and in this case limitation act applicable on me.
(4) Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 can help me to recover my property.
Thanks
My testatrix has one house. After her death, she wants 66% of the sale proceeds of the house to go to his younger son, as he is only taking care of her health, hospitalisation etc., and 34% to her elder son, as he is least bothered about her and abandoned her.
Her fear is that what happens, after death, if the elder son does not co-operate with the younger one in getting the title of the house the transferred to both their names, as he would get 34% only Will it not lead to lengthy litigation in the court of law.
My question is, whether an executor, appointed by her can get the property transferred to his name, sell and apportion in the said percentage, in order to avoid non-cooperation and litigation process in the court of law?
.
practicing advocate
02 February 2018 at 14:25
Respected Learned Counsel,
If all the terms and conditions goes in the favour of the landlord and the tenants left with no legal option to contest the case so is it not a exploitation of the tenant and infringement of the right of the tenant by the landlord
My query is that merely condition in the rental contract is suffficient for the landlord to evict the tenant from the rented shop or any other legal option is still available with the tenant to fight for the rights.
mdimr
02 February 2018 at 09:08
i have received a show cause notice from city civil court secunderabad, for execution of decree which is filed by bank.
Here i want to know , is this will be final summon (show cause notice) , after this decree will be awarded.
If attachment of property is awarded , can they attach the property of my father , brother . Or only the property
of mine will be took into possession.
Anonymous
01 February 2018 at 22:51
My house property is registered on name of my parents as a joint. In our house we had given a portion as a shop on rent in year of 2005-06. My parents are not aware of the legal documents which need to be process between tenant and landlord and also the tenant was family friends.
The tenant started their shop as an agency of FMCG. The rent decided at that time in 2005-06 is Rs 3000.
In 2009, our family had some financial issues and the tenant also given an offer to us that he could buy this 100 Sq. yards of the portion which include his shop from our house property.
So an agreement was signed on RS100 Stamp between my parents and tenant which contains
1. Date of agreement : 12-March-2009
2. Area of property to sell – 100 Sq yards.
3. The total deal cost amount as 20 Lakh.
4. The Paid amount of initial token as 2 Lakh which check number.
5. The rest amount of 18 Lakh was promised to pay within 90 days from the date of agreement.
The tenant was stop paying the rent from 12 March 2009 as he is one among the buyers.
After that my parents follow up with tenant on May 2009, but he said he need some more time of 5- 6 months to pay the rest 18 Lakh amount.
In March 2010 he again wants some more months’ time. And my family was financially scattered at that time. Now it’s no more beneficial to sell out our property as all the business is ruined out.
A big dispute held between my parents and tenant in which my parents told tenant that the deal time of 90 days is over by more than a year and now there is no deal.
But at that time my parents asked him to pay rent. And he said he already given 2 Lakh amount. And refused to pay the rent.
As my family were facing a worst days of life at that time as got kicked from everywhere so my parents never reach out to police, court, Advocate.
In 2016, my parents filed a case in session court against him that our tenant is not vacate the shop.
And neither have given us the rent from 12 March 2009.
In 2017 when tenant got info that my parents filed a case against him. Tenant also filed a case against my parents saying that he is the owner of that shop.
Till time its only Dates…. Dates…. Dates…..
No result.
What we can do?
How can someone file a case if he don’t have the property registered in his name?
.
Female rights in ancestral property
Respected Sir/Madam, I am Prashanth from Karnataka. My Grand-father has 5 Childrens, out of them 1 is female (My Aunt) whose DOB is 06-06-1953. After my father(in 1983), Grand-Mother (1999) and Grand-Father's(2007)death, we approached the Civil Court for partition of properties which held in the name of Grand-Mother (Purchased by her) and Grand-Father (both purchased and inheritance) and settled the matter in the Court by the way of Compromise in 2012. While compromising My Aunt is stating before the Hon'ble Judge and also in writing that "I have no rights in the properties and also I don't want any properties, so I accepted the partition". She also signed the Compromising Order issued by the court. After that we enjoying the properties. But now suddenly MY Aunt and her Childrens are demanding the 1/5 share in all the properties. 1.Is she entitled for 1/5 share? Please suggest me.