Gul Thadani
14 February 2010 at 16:12
Sir,
Thank u once again i think i have not put it in right way.
My grandmother had four children My Dad his elder brother and two sister. When she died she had made a will stating distribution of property in 1/4 share to each.Only in case of they sell the flat.
If not they can inlieu they give the money which my grand mother got from his brothers property, which was distributed equally among 5 people including my grandmother of which they the court document which i found.As the Abive said money was also a dispute case of the property of My grandmother younger brother who died with no children & wife who had expired earlier.
Now when my grandmother died she had mentioned in the will the equal share and also stating till my children are staying no one sell the flat.So this was tranferd on my Both aunts name and the nominee was my uncle.When my elder aunt expired who was first on the name and second my other aunt they didnt change the name.After which my father expired in 2007.So then my sister went to change they refused.
Now My other aunt also has expired.
So i am survived by my mom/2Sister/Wifeand son.
Now when i want the name to be change they are giving me all this answers so how do i go about to prove them that what they are saying is incorrect.
Gul Thadani
14 February 2010 at 13:31
Dear Mr Makkad,
I had spoken to the secretary of our society he is saying that my uncle who is the first nominee is the owner now.
Again i am describing the same
The Ownership was on My grandmother she died so according to her will the name got transfered on two anties.
Ms Ganga and second on Ms Dhami and the nominee was my uncle.
So what the secretary say in the event of death of My ms ganga aunty the nominee name is automatically goes ih her place.
When my dad was alive and also my aunt Ms dhami they didnt change the name as saying the nominee my uncle also sign the document. I am really confuse what to do as they are saying he has all the right on the property and society doesnt need to see any will which is family matter. Please advise
Anonymous
14 February 2010 at 12:56
If a litigant is unhappy with the Crossexamination of a witness more questions which were overlooked need to be asked, Can the witness be recalled for crossexamination again ?
What are the rules/conditions and reasons on which the witness can be recalled for re crossexamination ?
Anonymous
14 February 2010 at 12:36
hello all learned experts
i am plaintiff and lodged the suit for the viloaltion of the easmentary rights suit against the defendant meanwhile the application of the panchnama granted and meanwhile i gave application for the panchnama of the property of the defendant the said application was rejected by the lower court now i would like to proceed on wheter letter pattern will lie or revision in the high court pls inform
archana rathod
14 February 2010 at 11:57
please can you tell me the meaning of non judicial stamp document
Atish
14 February 2010 at 11:22
Dear All,
I would like to know what does article 151 of our Indian Law say which refers to An Advocate not to represent the client as the Advocate is required as a witness in that case and has also been unethical in his profession by representing the spouse of his own client and now standing as an Advocate against his own client of 5 years.
I would appreciate if this could be explained to me in detail and I would appreciate if any commentaries and passed case laws applied in the recent past or past be scanned and mailed to me on keepinz@yahoo.com
Regards
Atish
Member (Account Deleted)
14 February 2010 at 09:52
Fact:- A tenant [Plaintiff] entered in to an agreement for purchasing the rented premises. the landlord [Defendant No.1] played mischief and tried to sold the property to some body else. the tenant filed a civil suit for specific performance. suit was lost by him and so also the first appeal. during the pendency of suit the rented premises was sold to a third person, who was subsequently added as defendant [Defendant No.2] . And the relief of cancellation of the sale deed was also sought by way of amendment. second appeal of tenant/plaintiff has been admitted and the same is pending. Now the Defendant No.2 in the suit, who purchased the property, has filed a suit for eviction against the tenant/plaintiff on the ground of non payment of rent.
Question:- whether the present suit can be stayed on the face of the fact that the second appeal between the same party is pending?
Anonymous
13 February 2010 at 21:17
Lrnd. Experts,
An unemployed person is suffering from Major Depression living with his retired father (Age 77 yrs.) who too is suffering from health problems. Brothers and sisters are working outside very far from here. Some persons are trying to grab his land in fact have occupied and constructed on some portions. Land is in the name of his mother who has passed away. Since Police and Administration are corrupt and apathetic towards general people, Judiciary is the only hope. Can that person eligible to be plaintiff(Instead of his father) for the land against the miscreants?
With Regards to all.
Anonymous
13 February 2010 at 21:00
In un reg possessor y agreement of sale ,one of the boundary was wrongly mentioned.the vendor filed a suit for injunction aginst vendee denying the sale.under sec27[1]c of specific relief act we can file a petition to rectify the mistake regarding boundry.can u please give recent citations on this aspect.Recently a.p high court rendered a judgement on this aspect.But I could not find it.Please help me.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
About affidavit
What is affidavit and when it is filed before the court?