Anonymous
23 February 2010 at 13:48
Can we file a complaint under sec 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and a civil suit for recovery of the said amount simultaneously?
What if the party is ready to pay the cheque amount but the opposite paryt is not ready to accept but wud like to go with the proceedings?
Anonymous
23 February 2010 at 10:42
What we can get a temporary or permanant injection against govt from the civil court
parshotam lal
23 February 2010 at 07:59
MY DAUGHTER IN LAW HAS FILED COMPLAINT IN dOMESTIC VOILENCE U/S 18 f,g & 20 IN Nov 2007WITH OUT ANY REPORT FROM PROTECTION OFFICER AND WE ARE SUFFERING FOR THE LAST MORE THAN TWO YEARS AND SHE REFUSED TO PARTICIPATE IN INQUIRY AT WOMEN CELL ON THE COMPLAINT OF MY SON FILED BEFORE SHE FILED CASES U/S 498A 406,323,504.506 ipc AND 3/4 DOWRY ACT. THE CASE STARTED WITH OUT ANY REPORT AND WE LATER OBJECTED AND ASKED FOR INQUIRY AND NOW ON HER VERSION THAT THE PROCEEDINGS TO CONTINUE WITH OUT REPORT AS THERE IS NO PROTECTION OFFICER APPOINTED WE ARE HAVING MANY PROOFS AND NOW WHAT SHOULD WE DO. CAN THE CASE CONTINUE WITH OUT ANY REPORT.
How can I call those in the court who have done cruelty with my son.
J.R.
22 February 2010 at 23:26
Dear Sir/Madam,
we had bought minors property when the minor was 8 years old. the agreement was done by the mother on behalf of the son. The property was not inherited by the minor but purchased by the parents in his name when the minor son was 3 years old. Now the minor son is 20 and has filed a suit against us and his own parents demanding he be given back his land as the Court permission was not taken by the parents prior to sale as per Section 8.
However, during the purchase, just to be safe, we had the father also co-sign the agreement and we have an indemnity bond from both the parents saying that they will be responsible for any loss we incur.
Can you help us with some useful court cases/judgments which will be helpful to us in fighting this case against the minor son and also his parents?
Thanking you for any help.
Jayant Raghuram
yogesh bawiskar
22 February 2010 at 22:03
Plaintiff is not a member of maharashtra co-operative society. she is not debtor, guarantor. She never gives her property as mortgage to society. But her Husband is member of co-operative society and he is also debtor and he gives his share of property as mortgage. property record shows names of both as a owner. Co-operative declare auction sale of total property.so she filed suit in civil Court to stop the recovery proceeding in regards to her share in property. Defendend filed objection u/s 9A of C.P.C. Whether their objection is teneable or not ? please give suggestion with case law.
Thiru
22 February 2010 at 19:53
1. I have agreement with Tenant (Not registered) for 11 months
2. Agreement period is not over
3. Tenant not paying rent for last 5 months (Paid rent only for first 2 months)
4. Tenant gave oral notice period before 5 months (Notice period as per aggreement is only 3 months)
5. Tenant not saying will not vacate but always buying time for the past 5 months
6. Neighbors already raised oral complaints against Tenant (Ready to give complaints in writting also) for public nuicance with lot of dogs and cats inside house
7. Not allowing me (Owner) to inspect the house (Very difficult to enter because of lot of dogs inside)
8. Already informed (Not in written) to local police station
I went through many websites and many of them saying law is towards tenant and eviction is not easy it will lot of years to do that - Is it true? Can any one help me to file appropriate case to vacate / evict tenant sooner?
Hemant Dalal
22 February 2010 at 19:35
My client, who is a non resident indian, wishes to establish a public charitable trust in Surat, Gujarat. Our application is being rejected by the Asst. Charity Commissioner on the ground that since my client is a Non Resident Indian and is not having any permanent residential house in India, he can not become a trustee in the proposed Trust.
The Asst. Charity commissioner is pleading on the ground that there is a provision in the Trust Act that a trustee has to take Charity commissioner's permission to remain out of india continuously for more than 6 months and it is implied that only a resident person can become a Trustee
Please advise as to whether this contention is right? This is a bit urgent, since the application is pending for more than one year.
Thanks
raju
22 February 2010 at 18:44
i buy flat on ground floor 700 sq feet but on ground floor balcony is not shown on sanctioned plan but i requiested to builder to construct otta / balcony after that area is increased by 30 sq feet builder write total room sizes with otta / balcony size in agreement for sale is 730 sq feet. builder construct by masonary and r.c.c. concreting otta/balcony & handover the flat to me after that i fixes grill on masonary work of otta / balcony & included in flat & used from 1year. but after that my differences is creat with builder on maintenance amount . can i take actioned against on builder in consumer court for providing & constructing otta / balcony . and mentioning of 730 sq feet area as a flat area.
maintenance charge is same to all flat.one clause of agreement is "the area of said premises agreed to be purchased by the flat purchaser is on the basis of built up area, the calculation of the built up area includes full thickness of the internal & external walls, passages, toilets, staircases&/or any other area used as an amenity to the said building such as balcony, meter room.the area of flat under agreement is thus calculated to be 730 sq feet which the flat purchaser has ascertained,confirmed & the flate purchaser shall not be entitled to dispute the area so confirmed for whatever reason. please say court decision in my favour or not.
Anonymous
22 February 2010 at 15:54
a mobile tower is constructing in the adjacent property. what to do for stopping the construction? what are the laws applicable in this field
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Divorse Case
Hi,
I just wanna discuss a divorse case with u.my frind has got a experte divorse from her wife from the high court but her wife challenged it in supreme court.Now after 2 yrs She has agreed for final settlement & signed the agreement on the condition that she will withdraw all pending cases and filed for mutual divorse.She has not withdrawn any case nor is she appearing in the court after so many notices.Now final hearing is in april, is there any provision by which we can get the divorse decree passed by the court even if she does not attend the court.or any other way out as she is delaying all the proceedings.tell me the law or rule of any kind by which divorse can b asked as early as possibl as my friend is leavin the country in may & want to terminate all the proceedings.I have heard that under article 142 of constitution of india the supreme court has the power to grant divorse even if a party withdraw his/her consent.Pls help me out.
Thanks
Rachna