Anonymous
21 April 2010 at 23:15
Respected Experts,
I purchased a land thro registered sale deed in 1984. Which is in my possession and being cultivated by me. No one has any objection. Now when I read the deed carefully I observed a discrepancy regarding plot no. it is written 1010, but actually it should have been 1024. Other things like Khata No. description of boundary and area purchased are correct. This land is situated adjacent to my another plot 1025. Actual plot no 1010 belongs to other person. He does not know about this. The land is situated in a district town of Jharkhand. How it will get corrected? Plz, advice Thanks to all.
Chetan
21 April 2010 at 19:50
We have filed DV Case against Homos*xulal husband. They sent two notices to him but he rejected these notices. Now DV office said us that they will do wireless and call him and if he fails to come then they will give permission to us for filing 498 A against him.
But our lawyer said on the basis of that we can put a case in court for DV. I just wanted to know can we file DV case through Court. and what would be the actions Court would take against him......
Neeraj Kaushal
21 April 2010 at 19:38
i need citations of Supreme court and High court where application under order 39 rule 1 and 2 of C.P.C is allowed against respondent and respondent restrained from raising any type of construction over the suit land.
Anonymous
21 April 2010 at 15:16
Is there any alternative document besides registered release deed for releaseing rights in parental property,which is admissable in court of law, my brothers live in different parts of the world and different parts of india,one of them is suffering from disease and cannot fly back to my place at all for registration of release deed, is there any provision for any alternative document in law, kindly , let me know.can unregistered release deed duely signed and attested in presence of witness is of any importance.
any , provisions for special cases.
Anonymous
21 April 2010 at 14:42
There is a lot of confusion about the definition of ancestral property. Lets say X and Y are brothers and inherited and shared all their immovable property from their father. After X, his property passed to his only one son X1 , then to his only son X2 and then to his only X3. Four generations are completed and no partition happened in all four generation because of having lineage is of single sons. No person from X to X3 acquire any other property externally and added to the property.
In case of Y, story is different. Y had two sons, Y1 & Y_1. They distributed it by a will. Y1 had two sons again. Y2 and Y_2. They also distributed it by will from his father. Y2 had again two sons. Y3 and Y_3. They also inherited and distributed their property. No person from Y to Y3 did acquire any other property externally and added to their property.
Are the properties of X3 and Y3 individually can be treated as ancestral property?
gopalaswamyb
21 April 2010 at 13:00
The land was purchased in 1965 by the second wife in her name and she had four sons . three sons and the fourth persons widowed wife all jointly sold the property to another person during 1989 to another lady
now the first wife son claims for this property. is it legally permited the parent documents are in the ladies name. thanking you
Praveen Kumar
21 April 2010 at 11:11
Please help me by giving a format for filing a Memo for Cost of Adjournment in a District Consumer Court. I also need a format to file a Memo for requesting the Court to rule a 'No Say' against the opposite party as the opposite party has not come to the court even after 5 adjournments to file a version itself. Please also let me know if any document or support is to be filed along with the memo.
I also have a query if I can file a Memo for cost of adjournment for adjournments given on previous 3 dates.
In case it is not possible to write it as text in this page, please attach a file or upload the document to the uploads section or you can mail me at ipraveen@yahoo.com.
I will be greatly obliged for the help and many thanks in advance.
Anonymous
21 April 2010 at 11:06
"""A"" & ""B"" are the brothers. Registered partition had taken place between them.
Now ""B"" has sold his share of property to ""C"". So ""A"" has filed a partition suit against ""B"" & ""C"" claiming his rights in partition. Court has given status quo in favour of ""A"". Status quo is since last 2 yrs. ""A"" always asks the court to maintain the status quo. The suit filed by ""A"" is bogus, as he had sold his share long back ago, only to claim additional money from ""C"" he has filed a suit against ""B"" & ""C"".
Now can ""C"" file a malecious prosecution suit against ""A"" because ""C"" is in loss since last 2 yrs because of status quo. Is the suit maintainable because the suit filed by ""A"" is still going on its on order but the order is not yet passed.
"
anshul sangal
21 April 2010 at 08:42
Sir yesterday i went to court of civil judge senior division when i was looking for case status in Peshy Diary i came to know about 6-C written in front of our case ?So i want to know what is 6C?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Maharashtra co-op socities Act section 88
What are the defence for enquiry under Maharashtra co-op socities Act section 88 and rule 72.