vasantha
03 May 2010 at 15:10
My grand father purchased agriculture land Tamilnadu in 1941. Grand father died on 1958. Govt Revenue records show my grand mother name but Registered document has my grand father name. He has 4 daughters and 2 sons. I am Son's daughter. All my aunts are married before 1989 and died except one. Survving aunty filed civil suit on us to get 1/6 in agriculture land. My aunts has right to claim on that property ? Tamil nadu HSA 1989 law says female marreid before 1989 does not have rights. But Centre goverment HSA act 2005 says female has birth rights on father property. Which Act prevail n Tamilnadu?
Please clarify
Anonymous
03 May 2010 at 14:12
Respected Experts,
There is a SLP pending before Supreme Court of India. In an application, filed by the petitioner, on 04-12-2009 the Hon'ble court made the following order"Post the application along with the SLP for hearing during summer vacation, 2010". And according to the said order, the above said SLP has to be listed in summer vacation. But the same was not posted. So now what I want to do. I also requested my On record Advocate to see that it should be listed.
In such a situation, what we should do generally. I also sent a mail to the court's mail ID about not listing of the case, but I did not receive any reply. So Pl.clarify.
vijaypati singh
03 May 2010 at 10:27
Dear Sir i need u r expert opinion on this matter related to property.Can a custodian property or a property declared as enemy property can be sold or transferred. Plz give u r expert opinion.
vijaypati singh
03 May 2010 at 10:23
Dear Friends i need u r help/opinion on this matter related to a property. Can a custodian property or a property declared enemy property can be sold or transferred if it can be sold or transferred under which law it can be done and if it can be done are there any precedence matter is of urgent need plz post u r expert opinions ASAP.
pratik
03 May 2010 at 01:18
i have seen that when a dispute between 2 parties are settled with settlement letter or any letter says that i agree the points and pay u for xyz reasosns. the letter on the top contains the words known as "without prejudice or with prejudice or previlied or preivile "
Eg: a says that u have to pay me 5000rs. & b says no there is no legal liabilitiy arise but some how the other party known as b agree to pay the amount so while paying the amount he sends the letter or notice with the money due and in that letter the top of it has been written :WITHOUT PREJUDICE OR WITH PREJUDICE OR PRIVILEGE OR PREVILIVED " SO WHAT DO IT MEANS.
SOME SAYS THAT THE NOTICE OR LETTER CONTAINING THE ABOVEMENTIONED CAPS WORDS MEANS THE NOTICE OR LETTER IS NOT MEANT FOR EVIDENCE IN THE COURT OF LAW IS IT RIGHT PLS TELL ME THE TRUTH.
ALSO TELL the meaning of the words WITHOUT PREJUDICE OR WITH PREJUDICE OR PRIVILEGE OR PREVILIVED & WITH PREJUDICE save to cost or WITHOUT PREJUDICE save to cost.
Thanking u all experts in advance.
Anonymous
02 May 2010 at 23:59
Iam a staff nurse in jipmer since july2008. I would like to go for higher studies (2 years). am i eligible for higher studies legally after 3 years of service even under loss of pay also. If my employer doesn't give permission, what can i do? can i file a case and get?
Anonymous
02 May 2010 at 23:43
iam a staff nurse in jipmer since july 2008, an autonomous institute. iwould like to forward my application for state government posts through proper channel. does my employer has the power legally not to forward my application. If they are not forwarding my application what can i do? can i file a case against them
Anonymous
02 May 2010 at 11:53
Lnd Experts,
In a title suite, I was plaintiff. Judgment got passed in my favour by Hon’ble Sub Judge. During trial of this case defendants didn’t cross-examined our witnesses. They filed their documents but didn’t get it exhibited in the court also they didn’t do their final argument. Now after five months they (Defendants) have filed an appeal with condonation of delay. They have mentioned the reason for delay is that one of the defendant and her mother was seriously ill and was under treatment of a doctor. During trial of this case defendants were not appearing (since last 2 months before judgement) and also didn’t cross-examine three of our witnesses (have cross examine only one witness). They filed their documents but didn’t get it exhibited/marked in the court also they didn’t do their final argument. Hearing on admission of the appeal is on next month.
Will the delay be condoned after five months on this ground (there are 8 defendants and only two were ill)? Is there any citation in my favour?
Can they get their documents filed and exhibited in appeal case?
Will they cross-examine our witnesses again in appeal?
Thanks and regards to all.
Kanaksinh P.Boda
02 May 2010 at 10:07
I have a case pending at the hearing stage against a and b at a District Forum and the matter is due for oral arguement. However, one of the OP has issued a letter to c to act in a manner which will interefer with the subject matter of the dispute. Will such an act be considered as an interference with judicial proceeding indirectly? If yes, under what provisions can I seek relief in form of an interem order ? Can I apply for contempt of court motion ? Please give me your valuable guidence.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
stamp duty
what amount of stamp duty is needed on tri-partite agreement ?