koteswara Rao
05 July 2010 at 11:26
how to know the money lending license is compulsary in Vijayawada
pratik
05 July 2010 at 11:21
Can any body have the knowledge to explain me the difference between counter claim & set off as per the CPC with the help of a example(S)(S).
pratik
05 July 2010 at 11:18
The land at Mumbai is gifted by Mr.X. My query is, whether the gift deed can be registered at UP, even though the propery is at Mumbai. As I Have heard that Gift Deed must be registered within the Revenue Jurisdiction of the said property. In this case, I cannot registered the deed at UP.
But as per the belowmentioned sections
Registration Act, 1908
30- Registration by Registrars in certain cases.
(2) 4*[The Registrar of a district in which a presidency-town is included and the Registrar of the Delhi district] 5*** may receive and register any document referred to in section 28 without regard to the situation in any part of 6*[India] of the property to which the document relates. Registration or acceptance for deposit at private residence.
Also can u tell me what do u mean by presidency-town & also the difference between presidency-town & presidency.
So as per the above reading of the act whether to registrater the gift deed at UP or not.
Anonymous
05 July 2010 at 10:27
Sir, as per the above announced policy can a party file aW/P against an Ad Interim Order by District court in Gwalior(M.P.) to High court?
Regards
Puneet
Suri.Sravan Kumar
05 July 2010 at 08:55
Owner of the Lorry filed suit for recovery of damages to his vehicle from Insurance co as his claim was repudiated on the ground that the vehicle carried extra passenger beyond its seating capacity, which is gross violation of policy as well as permit.
The lower court decreed the suit in favour of the lorry owner. Insurance co preferred appeal.
Any citations in support of Insurance Company?
sravan kumar
pratik
04 July 2010 at 22:51
Under which section or law it is said that under Adminisrative Tribunal CPC & indian evidence act is not applicable.
1. Short title, extent and commencement - This Act may be called the Indian Evidence Act,1872.
It extends to the whole of India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir and applies to all judicial proceedings in or before any Court, including Court-martial, other than Courts-martial convened under the Army Act (44 and 45 Vict.,c.58), [the Naval Discipline Act (29 and 30, Vict.,c.109) or the Indian Navy (Discipline) Act,1934 (34 of 1934) or the Air Force Act (7Geo.5.,C51)] but not to affidavits presented to any Court or Officer, nor to proceedings before an arbitrator;and it shall come into force on the first day of September,1872.
But as per the reading of the direct tax code any proceedings between assessee & the income tax officer will be treated as judicial proceedings so can't we say that say per the reading of the indian evidence act section 1 the act (Indian evidence act) is applicable to the new draft will be coming in force form 1.4.2011 known as DTC, 2009.
Also tell me that under the statue if the tribunal power is created so how can we known that it is a administrative tribunal only & no other tribunal.
ALso this query has been posted many times but LD members aren't able to answer WHy i dont know.
So pls answer the query.
Thanks in advance.
Anonymous
04 July 2010 at 16:35
I have inherited 1/3 rd share of property which is around 1000 sq feet of total 3000 feet from my grandfathers brother ( A ) via an unregistered will who was unmarried and hence had no issue. The remaining parts belong to 1, my father and 2, my chacha (B)who is causing me trouble .
The entire proerty is one building which is lesed out and rents recieved by me, my father and my chacha , it was leased in year 2000 the property 1/3rd was mutated in my favour in year 2002.
Now my chacha is keen on challenging the will, as he has natural right on the property to some extent as there are some other uncles ( A's other brothers sons n total there can 8 claimants ) who also become the natural heirs of the said part if the will is revoked.
my quetion is
1) Can the will be challenged aftr 16 years of the death , as A died in 1994
2)Since 1994 there has been no claim does the law of adverse posseion apply
3) Mutation in my favour 2002 does it make my sitation any better
4) I am drawing rent since 2000 from the same building frm where my chacha is withrawing rent doe it not make obvious that he has accepted m as true onerof the land
Will the law of estoople help
pratik
04 July 2010 at 15:41
Difference between administrative discretion & subjective satisfaction type discretion with the examples.
(Pls who dont want to answer pls don't answer but don't write any thing that refer the books, act, it is not use to etc.) I am writting the above under bracket line(S) because some don't what to answer & writes any thing which is not related to the topic so the above mentioned has been written like an easy.
Also i apologize for the abovementioned para which is under bracket .
thanks in advance.
pratik
04 July 2010 at 15:32
AFTER HOW MANY YEARS CIVIL COURT DECREE BECOMES VOID IF NOT MUTATION IS DONE
Dear Sir,
Can some one quote the Sec of Limitations Act under which the Civil Court Decree become void (if mutation is NOT done within 12 yrs) also tell me the bracket words meaning ?
Also kindly print the language of the Sec concerned, since I do not have access to Indian Law books here and the Web Site presumably has not been updated, as it looks.
I think this query learned members can answer because most of my query are not answer i dont know why ? (some are writting pls read the books or act etc proper but it should be understand by the members that some of the position i am not able to understand so i am putting the querys to the learned members ) So pls help me out in solving the queries which i have posted earlier also.
Thanks
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
In Civil Suit Arrears of Salary is attachable or not
In Civil Suit "Arrears of Salary" is attachable or not