Gaurav Pandya
27 June 2009 at 03:46
For the accused side in M. P.'s District Court @ Jabua - The Stage is Recall of Bank officer.
(1) Complainant has not filed complain with cheque return stemps on cheques ?
After when they give the original check they get the stemps on cheques.
Is this point useful ?
(2) The cheques were of Security Deposit.
Than in N. I. Act it is useful to accused that the cheques were for the security deposits not for payment ?
(3) In core banking,
(A) there are not charges cut from account for cheques return ?
(B) The cheques were return after 4 days in local clearing and even though there are not stamps on cheque ? Is this complain maintanable ?
Is this point useful ?
(4) What will happen, is it possible, If the accuse dont want to go with more dates & proceedings and he is ready to pay the amount of cheques as compromise.
What will be thinking of the court ?
Please give me the detailed replies, and if possible than with citations...
Gaurav Pandya
27 June 2009 at 03:45
For the accused side in M. P.'s District Court @ Jabua - The Stage is Recall of Bank officer.
(1) Complainant has not filed complain with cheque return stemps on cheques ?
After when they give the original check they get the stemps on cheques.
Is this point useful ?
(2) The cheques were of Security Deposit.
Than in N. I. Act it is useful to accused that the cheques were for the security deposits not for payment ?
(3) In core banking,
(A) there are not charges cut from account for cheques return ?
(B) The cheques were return after 4 days in local clearing and even though there are not stamps on cheque ? Is this complain maintanable ?
Is this point useful ?
(4) What will happen, is it possible, If the accuse dont want to go with more dates & proceedings and he is ready to pay the amount of cheques as compromise.
What will be thinking of the court ?
Please give me the detailed replies, and if possible than with citations...
Gaurav Pandya
27 June 2009 at 03:43
For the accused side in M. P.'s District Court @ Jabua - The Stage is Recall of Bank officer.
(1) Complainant has not filed complain with cheque return stemps on cheques ?
After when they give the original check they get the stemps on cheques.
Is this point useful ?
(2) The cheques were of Security Deposit.
Than in N. I. Act it is useful to accused that the cheques were for the security deposits not for payment ?
(3) In core banking,
(A) there are not charges cut from account for cheques return ?
(B) The cheques were return after 4 days in local clearing and even though there are not stamps on cheque ? Is this complain maintanable ?
Is this point useful ?
(4) What will happen, is it possible, If the accuse dont want to go with more dates & proceedings and he is ready to pay the amount of cheques as compromise.
What will be thinking of the court ?
Please give me the detailed replies, and if possible than with citations...
gaurav_the_great@hotmail.com
A Sunder Rajan
26 June 2009 at 16:50
We are a NFP company looking for top legal firms in Hyderabad having expertise in dealing with Not For Profit Organisations(NFP)
A. Sunder Rajan
Head Infrastructure And Resources
George Institute for International Health - India
839C, Road No. 44A, Jubilee Hills
Hyderabad – 500033, India
Telephone +91 40 2355 8091
Facsimile +91 40 2354 1980
Email: srajan@george.org.in
Guest
26 June 2009 at 10:53
Friends,
If the company has issued only Fully and Mandatory Convertible Debentures during the year, where should this amount b shown in point 7 of FC-GPR Part B?
Guest
25 June 2009 at 10:31
Can anyone of u plz provide some reading material on Amalgamation.
P K Jindal
24 June 2009 at 17:32
vat has been wrongly charged instead of cst for dispatch of goods from punjab to outside the state. The goods have already been dispatched and reached to its destination in Tamilnadu. Please advice how to rectify the mistake and related matters
Priyanka
23 June 2009 at 17:32
Dear Experts,
Our Company has recd a Summon under Sec 235 of the Co Act, 1956, in relation to one of our customer. The transactions between our Co and the customer already took place and we stopped dealing with them, since 2005.
But even then, we have recd a summon from CG , wherein our MD is asked to personnally go to SFIO-Delhi.
Please advice, as regards what is to be done in this matter.
Awaiting your reply.
G L Gujrati
23 June 2009 at 16:19
Can a Bank after receipt of stop payment advice from the drawer and debiting the charges for the same,if pays the cheque on presentation, recover the amount by debiting the drawer's main Cash Credit account which is fully drawn ?.The cheque was drawn on the branch which has sub limit (10% of the total santioned limit) allocated to it.
Please advise with case laws and legal provosions what course of action is open to the drawer if bank does so.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
nego
For the accused side in M. P.'s District Court @ Jabua - The Stage is Recall of Bank officer.
(1) Complainant has not filed complain with cheque return stemps on cheques ?
After when they give the original check they get the stemps on cheques.
Is this point useful ?
(2) The cheques were of Security Deposit.
Than in N. I. Act it is useful to accused that the cheques were for the security deposits not for payment ?
(3) In core banking,
(A) there are not charges cut from account for cheques return ?
(B) The cheques were return after 4 days in local clearing and even though there are not stamps on cheque ? Is this complain maintanable ?
Is this point useful ?
(4) What will happen, is it possible, If the accuse dont want to go with more dates & proceedings and he is ready to pay the amount of cheques as compromise.
What will be thinking of the court ?
Please give me the detailed replies, and if possible than with citations...