LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Nehal   27 June 2009 at 12:12

Name availability for a Company

Dear Sir

Is there any limitation on using brackets in a name of a company to be incorporated in India?

Regards
Nehal

Gaurav Pandya   27 June 2009 at 03:47

nego

For the accused side in M. P.'s District Court @ Jabua - The Stage is Recall of Bank officer.

(1) Complainant has not filed complain with cheque return stemps on cheques ?
After when they give the original check they get the stemps on cheques.
Is this point useful ?

(2) The cheques were of Security Deposit.
Than in N. I. Act it is useful to accused that the cheques were for the security deposits not for payment ?

(3) In core banking,
(A) there are not charges cut from account for cheques return ?
(B) The cheques were return after 4 days in local clearing and even though there are not stamps on cheque ? Is this complain maintanable ?
Is this point useful ?

(4) What will happen, is it possible, If the accuse dont want to go with more dates & proceedings and he is ready to pay the amount of cheques as compromise.
What will be thinking of the court ?

Please give me the detailed replies, and if possible than with citations...

Gaurav Pandya   27 June 2009 at 03:46

Negotiable Instrument Act.

For the accused side in M. P.'s District Court @ Jabua - The Stage is Recall of Bank officer.

(1) Complainant has not filed complain with cheque return stemps on cheques ?
After when they give the original check they get the stemps on cheques.
Is this point useful ?

(2) The cheques were of Security Deposit.
Than in N. I. Act it is useful to accused that the cheques were for the security deposits not for payment ?

(3) In core banking,
(A) there are not charges cut from account for cheques return ?
(B) The cheques were return after 4 days in local clearing and even though there are not stamps on cheque ? Is this complain maintanable ?
Is this point useful ?

(4) What will happen, is it possible, If the accuse dont want to go with more dates & proceedings and he is ready to pay the amount of cheques as compromise.
What will be thinking of the court ?

Please give me the detailed replies, and if possible than with citations...

Gaurav Pandya   27 June 2009 at 03:45

Negotiable Instrument Act.

For the accused side in M. P.'s District Court @ Jabua - The Stage is Recall of Bank officer.

(1) Complainant has not filed complain with cheque return stemps on cheques ?
After when they give the original check they get the stemps on cheques.
Is this point useful ?

(2) The cheques were of Security Deposit.
Than in N. I. Act it is useful to accused that the cheques were for the security deposits not for payment ?

(3) In core banking,
(A) there are not charges cut from account for cheques return ?
(B) The cheques were return after 4 days in local clearing and even though there are not stamps on cheque ? Is this complain maintanable ?
Is this point useful ?

(4) What will happen, is it possible, If the accuse dont want to go with more dates & proceedings and he is ready to pay the amount of cheques as compromise.
What will be thinking of the court ?

Please give me the detailed replies, and if possible than with citations...

Gaurav Pandya   27 June 2009 at 03:43

Negotiable Instrument Act.

For the accused side in M. P.'s District Court @ Jabua - The Stage is Recall of Bank officer.

(1) Complainant has not filed complain with cheque return stemps on cheques ?
After when they give the original check they get the stemps on cheques.
Is this point useful ?

(2) The cheques were of Security Deposit.
Than in N. I. Act it is useful to accused that the cheques were for the security deposits not for payment ?

(3) In core banking,
(A) there are not charges cut from account for cheques return ?
(B) The cheques were return after 4 days in local clearing and even though there are not stamps on cheque ? Is this complain maintanable ?
Is this point useful ?

(4) What will happen, is it possible, If the accuse dont want to go with more dates & proceedings and he is ready to pay the amount of cheques as compromise.
What will be thinking of the court ?

Please give me the detailed replies, and if possible than with citations...

gaurav_the_great@hotmail.com

A Sunder Rajan   26 June 2009 at 16:50

Wanted legal firms in Hyderabad expertise in Not for Profit

We are a NFP company looking for top legal firms in Hyderabad having expertise in dealing with Not For Profit Organisations(NFP)

A. Sunder Rajan
Head Infrastructure And Resources
George Institute for International Health - India
839C, Road No. 44A, Jubilee Hills
Hyderabad – 500033, India

Telephone +91 40 2355 8091
Facsimile +91 40 2354 1980
Email: srajan@george.org.in

Guest   26 June 2009 at 10:53

FC GPR Part B

Friends,
If the company has issued only Fully and Mandatory Convertible Debentures during the year, where should this amount b shown in point 7 of FC-GPR Part B?

Guest   25 June 2009 at 10:31

Amalgamation

Can anyone of u plz provide some reading material on Amalgamation.

P K Jindal   24 June 2009 at 17:32

cst case

vat has been wrongly charged instead of cst for dispatch of goods from punjab to outside the state. The goods have already been dispatched and reached to its destination in Tamilnadu. Please advice how to rectify the mistake and related matters

Priyanka   23 June 2009 at 17:32

Inspection Under Sec 235 of Companies Act

Dear Experts,

Our Company has recd a Summon under Sec 235 of the Co Act, 1956, in relation to one of our customer. The transactions between our Co and the customer already took place and we stopped dealing with them, since 2005.
But even then, we have recd a summon from CG , wherein our MD is asked to personnally go to SFIO-Delhi.

Please advice, as regards what is to be done in this matter.

Awaiting your reply.