muthukumar
14 September 2009 at 14:00
Under Rule 42(O) of Food Adulteration Rules there is no specification of grade mark when compared to edible vegitable oil. so, pls clarify on this aspect since your explanation is with regard to Blended Edible Vegitable Oil, which is different from belnding of groundnut and palmolein Oil.
riven
muthukumar
13 September 2009 at 12:14
Whether package containing blending of palmolein oil and ground nut oil requires any agmark certification as far as State of Tamilnadu is concerned.
If yes, under what rule and notification ? Thanking you
riven
allurisivajiraju
12 September 2009 at 20:09
Respected Seniors,
One Registered partnership firm 'X' registered at Bhimavaram of West Godavari District of A.P. supplied goods to one individual Mr. 'Y' residing at Delhi on credit basis. Value of the said Goods is Rs. 10 Lakhs.
Subsequent to that Mr. 'Y' not paid the said amount to firm 'X'. Then firm 'X' filed a complaint at Delhi u/s 420 of IPC before the Magistrate Court. After receipt of court summons Mr. 'Y' executed an agreement at Delhi on 50 rupees non judicial stamp paper there in he agreed that he has to pay an amount of Rs. 8 Lakhs to firm 'X' with in a year. Basing on that agreement firm 'X' withdrawn his complaint at Delhi.
As per agreement with in one year Mr. 'Y' not paid the agreed amount of Rs. 8 Lakhs to the firm 'X'.
In the above circumstances it is not possible to file a civil suit at Delhi against Mr.'Y' for recovery of the agreed amount by the firm 'X'.
Firm 'X' wanted to file a civil suit against 'Y' at Bhimavaram since head office of the firm 'X' is situated at Bhimavaram.
Whether the suit is maintainable at Bhimavaram or not? what is the fate of the unrigistered agreement which was executed by Mr. 'Y' in favour of firm 'X'?
Thanking you in advance.riven
Saj
11 September 2009 at 18:54
The current share certificate is signed by the present Chairman/MD of the company. Is it required to change the share certificate if a new Chairman/MD joins ?
riven
tamilarasibabu
11 September 2009 at 16:41
Dear All
What is the Legal implication to be adopted for Non-Payment of Dividend,
i) can it be challenged before CLB under Companies Act? if it so, the relevant provisions under which it can be made?
ii)whether it will be a cause for raising Consumer Dispute or it vil be only a civil suit
riven
ALOKE KUMAR BARDHAN
10 September 2009 at 23:04
The banking Regulation (Amendment) ordinance 2007 has ommitted sub section (1) and (2) of Sec 24 of BR Act. Thus, ascheduled bank's SLR is capped at 40% of DTL to be calculated on afortnightly basis.
On the other hand, SEc 25 states that on a quarterly basis, a bank should keep assets in india, in Cash. Gold or unencumbered approved securities at 75% of DTL.
this appears to be contradictory to me. may be I have understood it wrong. My question is, when 40% is the cap, how 75% of DTL id expected to be maintained on a quaterly basis ?
riven
Avadhut
08 September 2009 at 21:22
Hi,
My name is Avadhut Nigudkar and my startup has acquired shop act license. I am going to start fund management activities where my firm will accept the funds and will give guaranteed annual returns to the investors.
I want to know is there any legal documents which I need to complete for this? Also,can I take insurance for this deposits with my firm ?
If I file an affidavit and sign the agreement with the investor,would that be enough as a security of the depsoit?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Avadhut Nigudkar
www.analytics.net.inriven
Dhiren Akbari
08 September 2009 at 01:31
please advice the course of action. agreement executed in dubai for supply of goods. supplier from dubai failed to supply goods. purchaser from mumbai. one clause in contract that it is to be governed by law of thailand.
- jurisdiction of indian court
- can suit be filed in dubai
- is there any international body to resolve this kind of litigation
- brieft procedure for filing suit, service of summons and argument and order and enforcement of order.
thank you.riven
Mangesh
08 September 2009 at 00:29
Dear Sir,
I had applied for a home loan through an agent. I provided him with all the required documents on 4th of July. Agent told me that as my age is less the tenure to repay the loan can be increased. As I received a confirmation about the loan amount on 15th of July form my agent I booked a flat on 26th of July.
But actually when I went to for an interview with the bank manager he told me that I was not at all eligible for the loan amount informed to me by my agent. The agent now is changing his words saying that he never said I was eligible for the loan amount X but I said that u can book a flat of X amount adding on my contribution.
Now the situation is that I am not getting the required loan amount as well as the builder booking recite says that the booking amount is not refundable.
I this scenario can I sue the agent for fraud and if yes under which law and also dose the law says that if the flat is cancelled the booking amount is not refundable, can I get my money back from the builder?
Seeking for your expert guidance.
Best regards
Yash
riven
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Cyber Bank Frauds
Do we have any reported cases regarding internet bank frauds in India?
Are our current laws efficient to deal with such cyber bank frauds?
Which country has effective laws regarding the same?riven