Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Anonymous   27 July 2010 at 18:03

Renual of Franchaise (brand user)Agreement

We are manufacturers of Packaged Drinking Water situated our Industry at Andhra Pradesh. and we got some reputed brand user agreement Andhra Pradesh Territory (non-exclusive basis) at 2007 April 23 renewal date at 2010 April 22nd. we are waiting for renual. the brand owner simply passing time'like wanted to discuss new terms and conditions' now they are telling simply already agreement lapsed, some others alredy got it. and one more news we got, that is they are given some others, same brand user agreement at 2009 March now only they told me. now what can be posible. we are invested huse amounts in this industry with their specifications. now we are struggling so much. how i can get neual? is there any posiblities. the brand owner cheated me.

Anonymous   27 July 2010 at 10:09

regarding mangaing dir

Dear sir,

is one person act like managing director for two companies at a time .

Abhinay Kumar Shaw   26 July 2010 at 23:14

N.I. Act

My father in law give me a gift cheque of Rs. 50000/- but the cheque become dishonoured. I informed him many times to issue me an another cheque but he doesn't response me.
Can I suit against him under N.I. Act.
Please give me proper ground and provisions under which I can suit the file.

Anonymous   26 July 2010 at 11:50

Distributors Rights against the Suppliers

Hi

Can some one please enlist the legal rights of the distributor against the supplier. Also suugest if there is an act or legal boundation towards the same .....

Anonymous   26 July 2010 at 11:49

Distribuors Rights against the suppliers

Hi

Can some one please enlist the legal rights of the distributor against the supplier. Also suugest if there is an act or legal boundation towards the same .....

padmarao   24 July 2010 at 00:40

138 N.I. dispense of accused for attendence

Namaste Sir,
In summons case 205Cr.pc says accused may be dispensed from personal appearence.but the court is insisting atleast for appearence for one time.I request you to clarify.my object is how to avoid the presence of accused by filing Spl.vakalath.this is 138 N.I. case.Are there any citations.The accused attended earlier before court twice when magistrate was on leave.
regards
padmarao

C.A Alok Mukherjee   23 July 2010 at 18:44

Direct use of business what could be the interpretation?

Can anybody help me, i want to know the implication of the meaning of direct use in business as per Value Added Tax Act?

Anonymous   23 July 2010 at 15:56

Corporate law

Hi All,

While making Merger do we have to get the approval from creditors, Is this compulsory.

Thanks,

Anonymous   23 July 2010 at 11:35

Company asking for Loss of Profit

My friend had signed an agreement in 2008 for purchase of Steel with a UK firm. He was supposed to open L.C. within 7 days of signing the agreement. He could not open the L.C.
There after there was no correspondence. Now the UK firm has appointed an arbitrator and is asking for compensation in loss of profit.
My question is - if when my friend was not able to open the L.C. within stipulated period- dosn't the contract becomes null and void? Can the UK firm ask for compensation when the first step of opening LC within 7 days was not fullfilled.
Kindly Suggest.

prashant1314   23 July 2010 at 10:58

Arbitration Tribunal & Court

Dear Seniors,

What is the difference between Arbitration tribunal & Court.

In Pune - Maharashtra where I can find Arbitration Tribunal?