P.C. Joshi
20 February 2011 at 23:15
Friends,
Can anyone please privide a soft copy of CLB petition u/s 186 of the Companies act.
Regards,
P.C. Joshi
Anonymous
20 February 2011 at 18:20
PUBLIC INFORMATION FOR
DEFENDANTS IN DRT
Whereas Judicial Tribunals i.e. Hon DRT and Hon DRAT have been
established under RDDBFI Act for adjudication of claims by Banks,
borrowers are hereby informed that:
1. To separate Executive from Judiciary and to give Judicial Freedom
in adjudication the Hon Constitution Bench of Supreme Court of
India has held in Madras Bar Association vs. R.Gandhi & Union of
India in Civil Appeal 3067/2004 & 3717/2005 Para 56(xiii)…."The
Administrative support for all Tribunals should be from
Ministry of Law & Justice. Neither the Tribunals nor its
members shall seek or be provided with facilities from the
respective sponsoring or parent Ministries or concerned
Departments.” (emphasized)
2. Inspite of the Hon. Supreme Court Constitutional Bench judgement,
Ministry of Finance still maintains administrative control of Hon DRT
& DRAT.
3. The Ministry of Finance officials are Board Directors of Banks who
inturn are applicants in the Hon DRT and at the same time they are
administrative regulators and paymasters of the said Tribunals in
clear violation of separation of Executive and Judiciary as provided
for in the Constitution.
borrowersrightsforum@gmail.com
If I form a pvt Company with my friend and we keep a clause in our artical of association that we can transfer our share to our relatives only and I transfer my share to my husband.My husband is a working Professional in a IT company than after transfer he has to switch off his job or he can work continuasly.what he has to do after getting share of the company?
Anonymous
20 February 2011 at 11:51
Can the verdict of Ombudsman appointed under Sec 42 of the Act be challenged in any Court/Tribunal.
VENKATA RAMANA MURTY INGUVA
20 February 2011 at 11:22
We are Contractors and due to dispute - Railway has appointed 3 member Arbitration Pannel for solving the problem.
However, they conducted two meetings and could not come to an judgement. After 2 meeting and after lapsing of 8 months no futher meeting are carried by them and not responding to our letters for the same and delayig the case further. In this circumstances what will be the course of action will be taken by us to solve the problem.
Your valuable reply is appreciated.
Further The apex court also disapproved the practice of bureaucrats appointed as arbitrator, being frequently transferred resulted in delaying the arbitration. How to proceed to change bureacrat arbitrator to be replaced by Court Appointed Arbitrators. Than you.
Thanking you.
Parveen Jain
19 February 2011 at 12:26
We Signed a Contract with Just Dial Pvt. Ltd.For their Service and Payment Made by ECS. And Paid Three Months Charges By Cheque For The Period 04/12/2010 to 03/03/2011. But Before Completed Three Months They Deducted One ECS Instalment From Our Bank Account On 27/01/2011.Now We Wants Cancelled The Contract And Refund Our Amount Witch Deducted From Our Bank Account. Whatwe do,Please Help
Anonymous
19 February 2011 at 09:11
The question is that if a public company is converted ito a private company,deposits taken from public and outstanding on that should be paid on maturity of the term of deposits or immediately ?
Anonymous
18 February 2011 at 15:39
Dear All,
The date of agreement is 28th January, 2011. Is the stamp paper dated 10th November 2010 for execution of the agreement is o.k?
is stop payment of cheque a criminal case
i am a trader. We give material on credit to our contractors. But one of my contractors payment is due from aug 2009. he has given me a blank cheque with my company name and sign only. the date mentioned is 27/01/11. my dues are around 7.5 lakhs. can i fill in the amount get the cheque returned and file a criminal case against him. Also if he comes to know and he makes stop payment of the cheque then will my case still fall under the criminal category. please advice me in this matter. thank you