Rao.T.N
08 September 2012 at 11:22
Dear Sir
what is the meaning of "without limiting the generality of the foregoing" and how far this word is leaglly valid ?
with thanks
Rao.T.N
syed niaz ahmed shah
08 September 2012 at 07:55
there is no agreement or any transfer of property to the firm , but ppropety shown in income tax returns nad balance sheet. the property purchased before the partnership was ever born in the name of three persons who are now partners of 2 more.
on dissolution the other partners are claiming it to be partnership property.
No credit has been given to the partners whose name is on the property in their capital or profit accrued.
The partners whose name exists on property are not agreeing to the property being partnership property.
No transfer of property has been done to the firm.
No value has been given to the partners.
it has been shown in fixed assets in balance sheet and not in capital a/c.
i need to know whether the property becomes partnership property. what are the safe guards the property owners have to take to protect their property from becoming partnership property.
a.manoharan
08 September 2012 at 02:58
Please discuss the Difference between Claim Petition and Plaint under CPC and their legal consequences ? After Claim Petition was ordered in another suit, for the same thing , can the suit be filed?
Dinesh
06 September 2012 at 21:36
does sec. 319 cr.p.c also applicable on complaint cases (on 138 negotiable instrument act cases).
can u guide me upon combine effect of 319 cr.p.c + 98 negotiable instrument act.
can we impled a new accused in case of 138 at the time of evidence without serve him legal notice ( which is not possible because of limitation)
Pradeep Panda
06 September 2012 at 16:28
Dear Experts,
I had availed a loan of Rs. 8,00,000 from a state bank of India and have executed an agricultural land and liquidable FDR for mortgage deed for security. Thereafter due to a riot in our kandhmal district, the regular transaction has not been made and the account was scheduled as NPA on 07-01-2010. Afterwards on 27.09.2010 bank issued a notice u/s 13(2) of Securitisation.....Act. After receiving notice, we requested them in written through regd. post to settle the a/c in OTS, but no reply from bank was made, how ever the reply should have been made within seven days as per rule (Securitisation.......Act) Further bank issued a letter u/s 13/4 of Securitisation.......Act on 29-01-2011asking for our co-operation to take possession of mortgaged property. Presently the bank has issued a possession notice under the same act with the information that the mortgage property has been taken possession by the bank. As far as my knowledge goes an agricultural land even if mortgage against a loan can not be taken possession by the bank under Securitisation.......Act.
Can I challenge before Banking Ombudsman or DRT?
Please guide me for above problem and suggest if there are any authorities to support this case. Thanking you all in anticipation.
K.K.Ganguly
05 September 2012 at 16:47
Some broker/agent manipulated documents and filled up 4 nos. blank & signed Money Receipts and claimed to have paid in total Rs.20 Lkahs in cash in 4 installments of Rs.5 Lakhgs each to the land owner. He is now demanding possession & registration of a flat from the land owner. The case is fixed for hearing before the Consumer Forum on 06.09.2012.
Is not cash transaction of more than Rs.50,000/- at a time barred by law? If yes, by which law or rule and under which section? Is it I.T.Act.?
Would the Ld.Experts kindly give their valuable guidance?
Thanks in advance.
Neeraj
04 September 2012 at 16:04
Dear Sir,
I am a partner of M/s Shree Lakshmi Road Tpt corp (registered) with my brother, Firm has purchased a immovable properties in delhi & NCR. Now I want to sell my firm and my brother and I, retirement form the firm and introduce a new new partner registered the retirement deed as well as supplementary partnership deed with sub registrar.
can sale of firm, impose a stamp duty because of transfer of immovable properties.
if any case law please provide.
Anonymous
03 September 2012 at 01:49
sir , i had done agreement with a pvt . ltd . company as a super distributor of thier brand for my district in. april 2012.
but company cheated me.they do the billing to other party in my area by approaching directly without any agreement till date for nearly 2 crores ..
what should i di!
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Formation of a company
If a new Pvt. Ltd. Company is to be formed for manufacturing purpose,will it be necessary to fill the column for category and sub-category in form 1A?If so, how it is to be filled up?