Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

CA Sahi Singla   28 February 2011 at 07:36

Correspondence LLB

Sir
Plz tell me the good university for doing LLB Correspondence (Academic).I am from state of Punjab.Is there any benefit of it ?

Anish Kumar Ojha   27 February 2011 at 21:08

Addmissions

I am a CA final Year student.I would like to know that on the basis CA I would be eligible to pursue LLB or not. Please do reply..

Nishikant   27 February 2011 at 00:17

Moot Court Cases (Order VI Rule 17 or CPC )

Atmaram & Sakharam are the defendants in the suit filed by their brother Tukaram for declaration that sale deed between Atmaram & Sakharam and one Vijay Jadhav in respect of the part of his ancestral property is not binding upon him & for partition . After filing WS, defendants now want to seek an amendment in written statement & want to insert a paragraph about the gift deed executed by defendant’s mother to the defendant’s prior to institution of suit.

Ref: Order VI Rule 17 or CPC We have to Defend this case plz suggest

Anonymous   27 February 2011 at 00:10

Moot Court Cases (The Sale of goods act)

The plaintiff filed suit against the shopkeeper and the company who manufacture TV on the ground that the TV supplied by the shopkeeper has some defect and not giving performance as claimed by the company all such defects have occurred during the period of one year from the date of purchase or within the period of its guarantee & the plaintiff prayed to the Hon'ble Court either to refund the price of TV along with interest thereon from the date of the purpose or in alternative, replacement of a TV of the same make.
it is the case of the defendant No 1 that whenever he received the complaint in respect of the TV the experts have attended all such complaints within the period of guarantee and the last complaint made by the plaintiff is after expiry period of the guarantee and therefore the defendant no 1 is not bound to either refund the amount of TV or to replace with a new TV of the same make.
it is the case of the defendant no 2 that the defendant no 1 never referred the complaint of the plaintiff to them and therefore it is the liability of the defendant no 1 in the event of the decree in the matter.
I need some facts of arguments for Moot Court Exam in Collage which is on 4th March 2011 please guide me on this

In this case we have to choose the party for argue plz suggest

Sunlawseeker   26 February 2011 at 21:36

ALL INDIA BAR EXAMINATION(AIBE)

Dear Advocates!

Can anyone let me known about the current status of AIBE in the Apex Court?

Thanking you

Regards
V.Sundaresan,
Advocate.

DINESHPATEL   26 February 2011 at 17:38

ltcg on dowry asset

sir
plz tell me how can i tax calculation of dowry asset. i was got a dowry asset & i sold it after 4 year how much will i take cost of aquisation of this type assets when i calculation ltcg

crpc   26 February 2011 at 12:26

Electronic Communication

Sir,

Are Emails sent to the official email id of concerned officer to Government of India Departments serving the purpose of full proof of communication in the Court / High Court / Supreme Court / Consumer Forum or not ? If the officer deny for that what should be the strategy to proof thr communication between both parties ??

Thanks & Regards,

AR

Anonymous   26 February 2011 at 10:28

What are admissible doccuments in the eye of law?

what are admissible doccuments in the eye of law?

Anonymous   26 February 2011 at 10:21

what is any any Judges committed crime?

what is any any Judges committed crime?

Anonymous   26 February 2011 at 09:56

why all juniors paid samll amount by their seniors

why all juniors paid samll amount by their seniors