RAVINDHAR
22 February 2016 at 22:07
Sir pls tell the future of advocate and what are the department available in the advocate professional... After course competing we can work in part time
RAVINDHAR
22 February 2016 at 21:35
One boy wish to study L.L.B but his status was poor to pay the college fees . If u know any institution will offered any free Law course??? He has belongs to S.C category..
s s murthy
22 February 2016 at 19:42
Sir, my daughter is a student from SRM medical college, her date of admission is Aug 2008 and last day was 3-4-2014. I have been residing in chennai since 1st March 2012. She also got her passport form chennai 7-4-2014 and I have also obtained a ration card in November 2015, she also got her voter id. As per the norm if a student completes 5 years of education she is eligible to b a native for furthering her education. Basing on d information available from tahsildars office I have applied for a nativity certificate with the above details but her application was rejected stating that I could not establish that she her stay in chennai for more than 5 years and also her stay in the hostel is not taken into consideration and also her mother tongue is Telugu. They have orally stated that people born in other states are not eligible for a nativity certificate. I request your opinion and what is the remedy I can exercise.
Jaimajor Singh
21 February 2016 at 14:18
Sir, how can i file RTI on gram pradhan about their work?
Anonymous
20 February 2016 at 07:46
I have applied for btech in IP University in reserved category (obc). But the problem is currently I m residing in south Delhi. . And I have obc certificate of North Delhi. .so is it necessary to change the address in the certificate.. or I can get admission with the current position of obc... If I need to change the address then what is the procedure
Dilip bhoyar
18 February 2016 at 18:54
Sir, Mr Ravindra (Respondent) has sign a sale agreement of property with mr. Burman (Plantif) for Rs. 5 Lakh. Mr. Burman has paid Rs. 4.00 Lakh in advance (2.00lakh Cash & 2.00lakh by cheque in faviour of Mr. Ravindra in his bank a/c)The agreement tenure is one year. But now Mr. Ravindra is refused to do the property in the name of mr. Burman and told to lies he has not signed any sale agreement with Mr. Burman.
Mr. Burman has a two eye witness where Mr Ravindra signed sale agreement. in the position above how can prove the sign of Mr. Ravindra for specific performance please guide
Dilip bhoyar
18 February 2016 at 18:50
Sir, Mr Ravindra (Respondent) has sign a sale agreement of property with mr. Burman (Plantif) for Rs. 5 Lakh. Mr. Burman has paid Rs. 4.00 Lakh in advance (2.00lakh Cash & 2.00lakh by cheque in faviour of Mr. Ravindra in his bank a/c)The agreement tenure is one year. But now Mr. Ravindra is refused to do the property in the name of mr. Burman and told to lies he has not signed any sale agreement with Mr. Burman.
Mr. Burman has a two eye witness where Mr Ravindra signed sale agreement. in the position above how can prove the sign of Mr. Ravindra for specific performance please guide
Vanijagannath
18 February 2016 at 16:55
Hello lawers club
I belong to bc-b my husband is St .iam qualified for one of the state public services and for certificate verification do I need to produce non creamy layer certificate with my husband's name or can I produce it with my father's name
rajendra gaikwad
16 February 2016 at 18:12
Currently I am pursuing for 3 year LLB course from Mumbai universityr. I am going to participate for the 1st time in a moot court competition held in our college. plz guide me for the preparation arguments. Thnx a lot..!
Below is the case assigned to me:
The medical examiner viewed the body of Naresh and con-clued that he died from a shotgun wound to the dead. Naresh had jumped from a ten storey building intending to commit suicide, He left a note to the effect indicating his despondency.
As he fell the ninth floor his life was interrupted by a shotgun blast passing through a window which killed him instantly.
Neither the shooter nor the deceased was aware that a safety net had been installed just below the 8th floor to protect the building workers and that naresh would not have complete his suicide the way he had planned.
Ordinarily a person who sets out to commit suicide the ultimately succeed even though the mechanism might not be what he had intended is still defined as committing suicide.
The naresh was suit on the way to certain death but probably would not have been successful because of the safety not caused the medical examiner to fell that he a homicide on his hands.
In the room of the 9th floor where the shotgun blast was emanated was occupied by the elderly man and his wife. They were arguing vigorously and he was threatening her with a shotgun.
The man was so upset that when he pulled out the trigger he completely missed his wife and pallets went through the window striking Naresh.
When one intends to kill subject A but kills subject B in the attempt one is guilty of the murder of subject B.
When confronted with the murder charge the old man and his wife were both adamant and both said that they thought the shotgun was unloaded.
The old man said it was a long standing habit to threaten his wife with the unloaded shotgun. He had no intention to murder her. So the killing of Naresh was appears to be an accident that is if the gun had been accidentally loaded.
In transpired that the old lady cut off her sons financial support and son knowing the propensity of his father would shoot his mother. Since the loader of the gun was aware of this he was guilty of murder even though he did not actually pull the trigger. The case now becomes one the one of the murder on the part of the son for the death of the Naresh now comes twist further investigation reveled that the son was in fact Naresh. He had become increasingly despondent over the failure of his attempt to enginner his mother’s murder. This led him to jump from the 10 store building only to be killed by a shotgun through the 9 storey building. The case was registered under section 302 IPC. Now argue the case with the respect to the Petitioner and the defendant.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
The future of the career
Respectd, all,
I am a student of 3yrs. ll.b(h). It is a regular course and I have completed 1st sem of the 1st year. Result for the 2nd sem of the 1st year has not been declared yet. And now I am in 3rd sem of the 2nd year. But one important thing is that I was a permanent teacher in a state govt. primary school while I was in the 1st year of the ll.b course and I have completed the 1st year by taking casual leaves, commuted leaves and half-pay leaves from my department of the job. And after starting of the 3rd sem of the 2nd year classes, I have resigned from my current job. Now, Being a student of ll.b, I have a question, is it possible or not that the duration of that job while I was in the 1st year can create any faulty problems or harmful effects in my future career which are based on law based course like judicial service, j.l.o, banking law officer, advocacy, professorship or in further law based course like ll.m, ph.d ??? If so, please assist me what should I do for the future of the career. Please be noted, before taking the admission for this course I have submitted all the supporting documents of that job to the authority of the university.