LCI Learning
Master NDPS 2.0: Latest Legal Developments, Best Practices & Landmark Case Studies

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Anonymous   01 April 2011 at 17:16

what is the trademark under TM aCT.

what is the trademark under TM aCT.

Anonymous   01 April 2011 at 17:15

what is the trademark?

what is the trademark?

Anonymous   01 April 2011 at 17:13

why banks or any some companies will not give loan to advocates

why banks or any some companies will not give loan to advocates

Anonymous   01 April 2011 at 17:11

why Govt is proposing that LAWYERS have to pay service tax?

why Govt is proposing that LAWYERS have to pay service tax?

Anonymous   01 April 2011 at 17:10

why all juniors paid small amount by their seniors

why all juniors paid small amount by their seniors

Anonymous   01 April 2011 at 17:08

why banks or any some companies will not give loan to advocates

why banks or any some companies will not give loan to advocates

Anonymous   01 April 2011 at 17:07

why all advocates use green papers in court proceedings?

why all advocates use green papers in court proceedings?

rahul   28 March 2011 at 14:06

Infrormation

i want to know about LPA

Aashish Satpute.   27 March 2011 at 14:16

domestic violance act

if complainant in the matter of domestic violence act is already who is psychological patent then who will be the complainant?
can her mother will be appointed as Next friend so as to file complaint against husband? any other remedy is there?

arsh   27 March 2011 at 11:43

cr.pc

Ram singh filled a criminal miscellaneous petition before the high court u/s. 482 of the crpc,1973 for the purpose of quashing FIR registered against him under the offence of cheating and criminal conspiracyu/s 419 read with section 120-B of the I.P.C.Ram singh pleaded in petition that since the registration of case against him on 01.03.2003 ,no evidence had been found against him and the registration of the case was only for political reasons.High court issued notice to the state.As the case was shown to be a case of gross miscarriage of justice only two weeks time was given.At date of hearing,the counsel for the state could not point out the material on the record for the purpose of involving the petitioner (Ram singh)Hon'ble judge of the high court being impressed by the counsel of petitioner ,quashed the F.I.R. against thr petitioner and pronounced the judgement in the open court.However,the judge subsequently came to know about the evidence on the record which showed involvement of the petitioner.Pertubed over his previous judgement which caused grave miscarriage of justice,the judge exercised his inherent power u/s 482 and revised his judgement which was contested by the petitioner.

Argue and prepare memorials for the petitioner and the state.

KINDLY help in solving this problem