Member (Account Deleted)
30 September 2008 at 18:13
what was the difference between a lawyer and an advocate.......?
does both are same or having differences..?
Rajaram C Iyer
29 September 2008 at 18:54
Dear Sir,
If in the appointment order there is a clause ( agreement) between the employee and employer that the employee will not leave the job without giving proper notice period. In these circumstances, can the company sue for recovery of money from the employee for not adhering to the contract?
Please give your expert advice
Legal_Query
29 September 2008 at 13:02
Dear Brothers & SIsters,
Previously it was the practice that whosoever wanted to become a judge would have to go for training under the guidance of a lawyer. This practice had been stopped for the sake of fulfilling the vaccum of judges in court. The intention was good, but the resultant is not favourable as far as the quality of judgement people are getting.
Judges now getting appointed do not have the requisite site of seeing things beyond books and have shortsightedness regarding the practical nature of law. It is saddening to hear from judges "... why would police file a false case" or "...since the police have said against the accused he is guilty as they do not have prior animity against the accused". If prosecutrix will become the investigator and the witness what defence will a normal lay man will be left with, everyone is not mentally and economically strong to fight to the supreme bench. These type of judgments are not only breaking the criminal justice system but also the lawyers who are in the field.
We are also seeing judges who want judgements / citations regarding the settled principle of laws, acts. The type of judges reaching the chair of justice is saddening, they are themself acting as brat, egoistic, rigid and have no ears for listening to things contrasting to their beliefs. Why should lack of proper investigation be going against the accused. If these type of judges are continued to be appointed the lack of quality judgment is going to be seen. Fault of investigating agencies cannot be burdened on the accused, but in reality what is happening is heartbreaking.
Judiciary for whatever reason is going for the quantity of judgement rather than quality of judgment. Speedy trial without quality cannot be a solution but more appointment of people having right calibre and attitude will be. This will not only restrict the no. of litigation but also enhance the no. of judgment.
Seeing present situation it seems proper to suggest that all the students of law should be sent for training under a lawyer after their final year and degree be awarded after the said period or after getting the degree they be trained under a lawyer before getting to sit in for civil judge (the previous practice). Citizens life and carriers are on line of fire, people giving justice should have the nerves to show through their judgments rather than saving hands and contributing to no. of pending cases.
Judgment in a case is never satisfying for both the parties but it is of prime importance that quality and nature of justice be maintained.
"Restore the previous practice of appointment of Judges"
Rgds
jayachandran
28 September 2008 at 11:04
Hi
Anybody inform me, whether there is any decision by a High Court or Supreme Court under the Micro,Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 200
shantilal k. patel
27 September 2008 at 14:31
Dear Friends,
Can a member delegate the voting right to any other person in the election of the
managing commettee members by General Power of Attorny?
If no why?
s.k.patel
sandhya
27 September 2008 at 14:17
Hi, Could anyone help me the laws appplicable to expansion of dealership network in India?
Thanks,
Sandhya
susanth nair s
26 September 2008 at 07:24
an affidavit which is attested by a notary advocate and sworned by the deponent on 10/01/2007 now can it be produced it is an affidavit required to be produced for recruitments of jawans whether notary affidavit is valid for a specific period plz help me
SRIPRAKASH BHATTACHARYA
25 September 2008 at 22:36
IN A MULTI STORIED BUILDING OF A COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY OR APARTMENT OWNERSHIP SOCIETY WHEN A LEAKAGE IS OBSERVED IN THE TOILETS BY THE FLAT OWNER WHO IS JUST DOWN BELOW THE ABOVE, WHO WILL BEAR THE COST OF REPAIRING ? SHOULD IT BE SHARED EQUALLY BY BOTH THE OWNER OF THE DOWN FLOOR FLAT AND UPPER FLOOR FLAT OR THE UPPER FLOOR FLAT OWNER ONLY.
LOGICALLY, I FEEL THAT THE OWNER OF THE DOWN FLOOR FLAT WHO HAS BEEN SUFFERING FOR NO FAULT OF HIS OWN SHOULD NOT SHARE THE REPAIRING COST.IT SHOULD BE DONE AND BORNE BY THE UPPER FLOOR FLAT OWNER AS HE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR HIS FLAT.
SHALL BE GRATEFUL IF ANYONE GIVES ME TRUE, LEGAL AND LOGICAL CLARIFICATIONS ONN THIS ISSUE.
SRIPRAKASH BHATTACHARYA, KOLKATA
bhattacharyasriprakash@gmail.com
25.09.2008
Rekha.....
25 September 2008 at 21:45
Hello! friends
Would u plz help me in getting the address of City Civil Court in Bali(Pali District) in Rajasthan. I hv to issue smmons from Valsad
if it is possible plz inform me immediately
Thanx
Member Strength 9,52,091 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
human rights
what are the job oppertuinities for llm students in human rights.please give in details about it.