Hi Friends,
In June 2006, I filed a Writ of Mandamus to direct the Municipality to demolish the offensive portion of a building constructed on the boundary wall against the approved plan and rules. But the offender (while the Writ is in existence) three months later in September 2006, filed a false civil suit against me (with an intention of frustrating the Writ Petition) in a Lower Court and referred the presence of the civil suit in his Counter Affidavit in the Writ in November 2006 (5 months later).
The High Court rejected my pleading saying that there exists a civil suit on the property for demarcation of boundary. Against this order I filed Writ Appeal where, to prove that the Civil Suit is filed later than the Writ, I produced the copy of the pliant in the false civil suit filed by the offender. But unfortunately even after seeing that the Appeal was not admitted. Please help me how to proceed. And where all I can take-up this matter to get justice.
Thanks!
I lost only brother in road accident in March 17 2003.He was 29 when was killed in the accident.He was riding a two wheeler and was hit from behind by speeding tipper lorry.He was married with two children
We have filed insurance compensation to seek some kind of monetary benefits to his kids.The case has not moved to any extent.It jus remains as filed in the chennai High court.
I request the esteemed experts to let me know whether the delay is part of our judicial process of the enormous amount cases filed each year or is there any process to take it and speedup the same.in simple words how long does it take for a case to be heard by the panel.
Sir, We have a G+2floor building. It was constructed by father in law. There is a common wall between us and my neighbour Which is the main wall for my building. Now our neighbour wants to remodel his house. He wants to dig his part of the wall which will cause lot of damage to us. It was build nearly 30 yrs ago. we can not remove our building. He uses all his name and fame to do this. So, How to proceed in this matter?
Dear All,
Company A is situated in Karnataka,it has allotted shares to company B at premium, which is situated in mumbai. Now company B wants to tranfer those shares to its own directors at face value. Let us know 1.whether transfer can be made at face value whereas it has been allotted at premium?
2.Whether answer will be differ if there is only two days gap between both the transactions.
3.As Company B transfree, is situated in Mumbai,whether stampduty need to be paid as per Maharatatra or karnataka?
Dear Sir,
I want to know whether Rule no 7s.26A of Punjab Civl Services Rules is applicable or not on the Retired Cheif Engineer of Dakhshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam, Haryana (Erstwhile Haryana State Electricity Board).
This rule is regarding commerical employment after retirement and is generally applicable for State Services Class I.
Please advise. If you need any further information, Please feel free to call me on 9717391260
Thanks
Needs a judgement on the ground that maternal relatives are not entitled to claim, if also they are the only relatives alive of the deceased and also if these relatives are earning poorly.
Dear Expert,
Could you please answer this querry:
Ours is a private limited co with Authrised Capital of Rs.1.50 crore and paid up capital of Rs.89 lakhs. Company has four share holders all are from one family and are NRIs since 1997. Company established in 1989. It has 3 directors 2 promoter directors and one salaried Director.
One of the promoter directors established a company in UK (closely held). This company in UK wants to buy shares worth Rs.50 lakhs in our company at par.
1.Can you guide me how to received the money?
2.What are the approvals required from RBI
3.Is it possible for this foreign company to buy more shares in the company at a later stage and become Major share holder.
Your early reply shall be highly appreciated.
Can firm of chartered accountants be prevented to act as auditor of listed public limited companies if
(a)one of the parter has filed criminal/civil cases against other partners
(b)They do not talk to each other.
(c)there was fight amoung the partners,matter went to the court and court directed that all the financial transactons should be sign by two partners each representing one group
(d)filing cases by partners against each other is a ongoing process
Can Hight Court restrain such firm to
act as a Auditor of Listed Public Limited Companies if PIL is filed?
Can firm of chartered accountants be prevented to act as auditor of listed public limited companies if
(a)one of the parter has filed criminal/civil cases against other partners
(b)They do not talk to each other.
(c)there was fight amoung the partners,matter went to the court and court directed that all the financial transactons should be sign by two partners each representing one group
(d)filing cases by partners against each other is a ongoing process
Can Hight Court restrain such firm to
act as a Auditor of Listed Public Limited Companies if PIL is filed?
Filing of F.I.R.,
Dear friends,
We, in general insurance companies, generally ask for FIR from the claimant/Insured as a proof of genuinity of the loss and to rule out the connivance of the Insured in the occurrence of the loss.
In cases of property damage, the police authorities refuse to file FIR stating that FIR will be filed only if there is death of or injury to anybody. They, in turn, give certified extract of GENERAL DIARY [GD] entry only.
Does it mean that FIR can be filed only if the action involves any offence attracting any sections of Indian Penal Code or any other act? Can FIR be not filed for any accidental damage to vehicle, accidental fire to the goods insured, etc.,
Kindly enlighten.