LCI Learning
New LIVE Course: Toxicology and Law. Batch begins 21st July. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Manish Kumar Gupta   28 January 2010 at 20:24

Vulgar Messge Received from Airtel

Dear All..

One of my freind received one vulger message froom Airtel, Which was read by his father. He got punished without any mistake.
Now He want to file a case agaist Airtel for compantation in Consumer Court.
Can He do so..?
Please suggest for the procedure or any other remedy available.

Regards,
Manish

Anonymous   28 January 2010 at 16:20

oppointment of central govt notary

redpected sirs. i read recent ammendments about oppointing notary [central govt]. can any experts guide me to what r the formalites to follow.and tell me any advocates name oppointed as notary after the ammendments

Anonymous   28 January 2010 at 16:08

Calculation of interest on GPF

Dear Sir,

I am a govt. officer and covered under General Provident Fund. The subscription may vary every month. I can take advance and final withdraw also. At the end of the year how can i calculate the interest and final balance at my credit.

RK Khera

Narukulla srinivasa deepak   28 January 2010 at 12:19

hi i want to start a law college

hi, my name is deepak i am a llb final year student i want to start a autonomous law college and i dont know the procedure i mean how to register where to register whats the legal procedure to establish a law college how to get permission plz help me my email id is deepak143143@gmail.com and withudove@gmail.com plz help me out

Anonymous   28 January 2010 at 04:17

Unauthentic message

Respected Experts,
Yesterday in the evening I received a message in my cell phone,
“YOU HAVE WON ONE MILLION GREAT BRITISH POUNDS IN 02 PROMO DRAWS TO CLAIM FUNDS SEND YOUR NAME ADDRESS & PHONE NUMBERS TO A.BRIAN VIA EMAIL: ukcomtel@hotmail.com
SENDER: TM-INF02
Message centre: +919220755008
Sent : 27-JAN-2010”
Since I am living in a very small and educationally backward town, also Police here is other name of demon. What precaution should I take and what should I do? Thanks to everyone.

Parveen Kr. Aggarwal   28 January 2010 at 01:09

Red Lights

Which provision of the Constitution of India authorises use of Red Beacon Lights on the top of the Vehicles?

What purpose such Lights serve?

Is the use of such Lights (and all legislation/delegated legislation framed permitting their use) not violative of Right to Equality guaranteed under the Constitution? What is the object sought to be achieved by such provisions (Intelligible Differentia)?

Does the use of Red Beacon Lights (which makes the person having it a previleged person) violative of Article 18 of the Constitution of India which prohibits conferring and accepting titles?

How and where the practice originated?


Anonymous   28 January 2010 at 00:22

dying in harness

A boy age 23yrs his father died in dec 2005 .He was a government medical officer and his stepmother is also government medical officer at present. he has no any brother n sister .
the problem is he want govt service (dying in harness) but govt rule is, if mother is already in service(govt) no service will be given to son in dying in harness. what will boy do because he is not able to take any benifit to govt and his condition too poor ,step mother do not support to him financialy.he is not able to take leagle action to him .please suggest that what he do.

Parthasarathi Loganathan   27 January 2010 at 20:32

Pending Queries

Please visit my profile and cull out all the pending and unresolved debates for professional enhancement.

Sridhar   27 January 2010 at 20:30

Query on Execution Petition

Dear Sir,
I asked my lawyer to quote the citations given in this forum with respect to "whether executing court has jurisdiction to alter or amend or add to the decree".
He is apprehensive to quote these citations saying that it might adversely effect the case as consumer forum are more interested in disposing the case than looking into the root cause of the issue and also says that our complaint on which we got a decree was weak and judge might ask few questions which would put us in trouble again.
In this regard can you please let me know
1.Whether judge can again go to the complaint instead of the decree passed and dismiss the EP?
2.What if the EP is dismissed again?please note that first EP is dismissed and builder upon interpreting the first EP dismissal order is asking for Rs 40lakhs as various charges for registering the flat when the decree clearly says that i need to pay only difference in stamp duty and registration?
3.What courts can i appeal if EP order is adverse or if its dismissed again?
Our EP is scheduled for hearing tomorrow morning (28/01/2010) in State forum,Karnataka.

Regards
Sridhar

Parthasarathi Loganathan   27 January 2010 at 20:17

Intervention of Court

I have posted a query on Transport Woes in the Expert's forum. The facts in the issue are very glaring that though every citizen is aware of the plight, no concrete steps have been initiated to set things in order. Public Interest Litigation do not necessarily yield the desired results to highlight the matters which are detrimental to Public Interest at large. My specific doubts are summed up as under:

(a) As in the case of high profile matters, under which circumstances the Court intervenes into the matters which are detrimental to public interests?

(b) What are the Constitutional provisions and obligations on the part of the Apex or High Courts to question the authority of the State ?

(c) Is there any Judicial Committee which monitors the matters which upset the peace and tranquility in the State on account of misdemeanors of Public Authorities?

(d) Are there any precedents which match the similar facts where interests of common citizens are protected by the intervention of Courts?

(e) Whether any High Court is vested with any constitutional powers to question the acts of the State in the absence of any Public Interest Litigation?

I need specific point-war guidance from the expert panel in the interest of Common Citizens.