ksethuramalingam
20 January 2017 at 18:00
Dear sir,
My father in law got ancestral property of his father.Out of this property he gave some property to my wife as donation ( dhanapathiram) For the balance property my father in law made a partition deed for him one share and his two sons one each.My mother in law is alive and my father in law expired in 1977.He has not made any will.
We are asking for one fourth of my father in laws share from the partitioned property. This is self acquired property of ancestral property?
My father in law's uncle expired without any child. My father in law's 2 sisters and one aunt filed a case for this property and he got a share out of this property through court order. Will it be considered as ancestral property or self acquired property.
Waiting for your kind reply.
Regards
K.Sethuramalingam
Member (Account Deleted)
20 January 2017 at 17:18
My parents had acquired our ancestral house from my grandfather in 2010. They paid as much for the house, as my grandfather asked to. It was slightly lesser than the circle rate of the house at that time. A will was signed by my father, his 2 brothers, and grand father which states this amount and the fact that my grand father is giving it to my father. However, at that time, my aunt, father's sister did not come to sign the will. Also, a registry was not done at that time because my parents had financial constraints. They wanted to go for it this year, after finishing with the responsibility of my sister's and my wedding. But my grand father passed away a few days back. We fear that despite my parents having paid for the house, his brother(s) or sister may raise a dispute. Is there any way to still get the registry done or avoid a dispute by any other means?
Aditya Dev
20 January 2017 at 16:17
IN SECTION 14(1)(E) CAN A LANDLORD EVICT THE TENANT IF HE NEEDS THE LAND FOR OPENING A SHOP FOR HIS SON??
aaaaarrrrr
19 January 2017 at 23:06
I am 70 years old widow. Due to disputes with my son and daughter in-law I came out of the house. My husband purchased the property when my son age is 19 years a house plot on my son's name and 2) My self also purchased one house with my savings and with death receipts of my husband in the name of my son. As I am out of the my son's house, when I asked for my property the son is saying I will not give back do what ever you want. He is now 48 years of age now he don't want to give the property in his name even though it belongs to me as it was purchased by my husband and myself only kept in my sons name by trusting and he will see me till my death. Now he sent out of his house I want to take my property back. I am a hindu women I have only one son and three daughters.
Is there any remedy to get my property back and live independently. If so please help.
Now I am in Hyderabad.
Mrunmai Deshpande
19 January 2017 at 16:14
We are 4 brothers. After the death of my father his flat was transferred to our mother's name for which no objection letters were given by us all 4 brothers for this transfer.This flat was purchased by my father from his own earnings. I have 2 queries.
1. Do we brothers still have any wright over this flat?
2. If my mother wants to sell this flat, is it necessary for my mother to take NOC from us?
Please advise !
Gaurav
19 January 2017 at 01:13
Hi,
I am one of the Flat Owners in a Gated community of 200+ flats in Hyderabad.Builder has called all owners this Saturday for Parking allotment and We are sure that parking demarcation/lining done by him is wrong and it leads to provding very small parking space for a Car.
Can you please enlighten us with the standard Car parking Space dimensions for a Flat in Gated community in Hyderabad as per GHMC/HMDA and as per law.
Suresh
19 January 2017 at 00:58
Dear Sir
I have entered into an agreement to purchase land at mancherial mandal (adilabad district, telangana). The pahani(s) show that the land is a "38E - Patta". I have obtained pahanis from 1965, all of pahanis after 1975 show the current pattedar as the patta holder with "38E - patta". Before 1975, I can see most of the survey numbers (before/after the survey number i am intending to purchase) show one name in pattedar column. So this confirms that the current owner got the land through land ceiling (Protected tenant)
My concerns:
1. The current owner is owning the 38E patta from 1975, is it okay for me to proceed to buy the land? or do I have to obtain the 38E certificate? If so, where to obtain the 38E certificate
2. The current owner has Ac 6.00 Gunta in the passbook/pahanis. Does it mean he owns the total Ac 6.000 Gunta OR he owns the 60% of land? Please bear with me, as this is only for clarification....as some people told me about the 60%.
3. What other things I have to do to make sure I am buying the legal land
Pls suggest me clear about 38e ....
Rajendra
18 January 2017 at 13:32
Dear Ms. Usha Kapoor Madam,
Consent Terms duly signed by the parties and
Their Advocates tendered, taken on record and marked “X”.
Decree in terms of Consent Terms.
Refund of Court fees as per rules.
Prothonotary to act on the Minutes.
Smt. Ramrati Radheshyam Gupta ) . . . . PLAINTIFF
Versus
1. Ramesh Ramdeo Gupta )
2. Rajendra Ramdeo Gupta )
3. Pushpa Ramdeo Gupta )
4. Kamla Ramdeo Gupta )
5. Devendra Radheshyam Gupta )
6. Mahendra Radheshyam Gupta ) . . . . DEFENDANTS
CONSENT TERMS
1. The Defendants waive service of Writ of Summons.
2. Defendants admit that the properties described in Ex ‘A’ to the plaint were the property of Hindu Undivided Family consisting of plaintiffs and defendants.
3. Defendants (1) Ramesh Ramdeo Gupta, (2) Rajendra Ramdeo Gupta, (3) Pushpa Ramdeo Gupta, (4) Kamla Ramdeo Gupta, admits that under an Agreement of Family Settlement dated 1.10.1998 at Ex ‘D’ to the plaint, defendants (1) Ramesh Ramdeo Gupta, (2) Rajendra Ramdeo Gupta, (3) Pushpa Ramdeo Gupta, (4) Kamla Ramdeo Gupta received from the plaintiff and defendants (5) Devendra Radheshyam Gupta, (6) Mahendra Radheshyam Gupta a sum of Rs.75,000/-(Rupees Seventy Five Thousands only) by cheque no. 434494 dated 25-1-1999 and another sum of Rs.75,000/-(Rupees Seventy Five Thousands only) by cheque no. 434495 dated 2-2-1999 drawn on Shramik Sahakari Bank Ltd., Sakinaka, Mumbai branch totaling to Rs.1,50,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Fifty Thousand only) in full and final payments of the value of their share in the property mentioned at Ex ‘A’ to the plaint and in consideration therof they have relinquished, released and surrendered all their right Title and interest therein in favour of the plaintiff and defendants (5) Devendra Radheshyam Gupta, (6) Mahendra Radheshyam Gupta. Defendants admit the correctness of the contents of the said Agreement of Family Settlement at Ex ‘D’ to the plaint. Defendants further admit that they have duly signed the said Agreement at Ex ‘D’ to the plaint after being read over the same to them in Hindi language. Defendants (1) Ramesh Ramdeo Gupta, (2) Rajendra Ramdeo Gupta, (3) Pushpa Ramdeo Gupta, (4) Kamla Ramdeo Gupta, admits that they have now no right title and interest of any nature whatsoever in the said property described in Ex ‘A’ to the Plaint.
4. Defendants (1) Ramesh Ramdeo Gupta, (2) Rajendra Ramdeo Gupta, (3) Pushpa Ramdeo Gupta, (4) Kamla Ramdeo Gupta, agree and undertake that they will neither interfere with the management of the said property by the plaintiff and defendants (5) Devendra Radheshyam Gupta, (6) Mahendra Radheshyam Gupta as exclusive owner thereof, nor shall they interfere in getting the said property transferred in the name of plaintiff And defendants (5) Devendra Radheshyam Gupta, (6) Mahendra Radheshyam Gupta.
5. Decree in terms of Consent Terms.
6. No order as to cost.
NOW PLEASE GIVE SUGGESTION TO BELOW MENTIONED MY QUERY :
IF PLAINTIFF EXPIRED AND DEFENDANT NO.1 IS ALSO EXPIRED AND THE GIVEN RIGHTS WERE NOT EXECUTED IN 17 YEARS BY THE RIGHTS HOLDER i.e. DEFENDANT NO. 5 & 6.
NOW I WANT TO KNOW THAT IF RIGHTS WERE NOT EXECUTED IN 17 YEARS BY THE DEFENDANT S NO. 5 & 6,CAN DEFENDANTS NO. 5 & 6 WERE EXECUTE IT NOW?
If possible give me your address for personally meeting & showing documents to you personally
Thanks & Regards
Rajendra Ramdeo Gupta
9222211660
shivshanker jain
18 January 2017 at 13:09
there are two directors in company . one invested money to buy property in name of company , now other director has stolen original papers.
what precuation should be taken to prevent sale of property further.
none of director is having shareholding in the company
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
14(1)(e) of delhi rent control act
my question is:
Is there any need to serve notice on the tenant regarding eviction on the ground of eviction for bona fife need before approaching the rent controller??