SUMISION OF DIFFECTIVE SHOW CAUSE

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 21 May 2011 This query is : Resolved
AS A PETITIONER I HAVE FILED A PETITION AS PER ORISSA LAND REFORMS ACT u/s23 A BEFORE THE SUBCOLLECTOR.

I HAVE MADE 3PERSONS AS O.P IN MY APPLICATION.

THE LAW MANAGER OF THE OPOSITE PARTIES HAS SIGNED THE VAKALATNAMA STATING THAT HE IS THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER BUT HE HAS NOT FILED ANY POWER OF ATTORNEY. NOR ANY ONE OF THE 3 OPPOSITE PARTIES HAVE SIGNED THE VAKALATNAME.IS IT ACCEPTABLE?

THE OPPOSITE PARTIES HAVE NOT SIGNED THEIR SHOW CAUSE, WHICH THEY HAVE FILED IN THE COURT. IS IT ACCEPTABLE?
SHOULD I REJECT THERE SHOW CAUSE?

YOUR KIND REPLY WILL BE HIGHLY APPRICIATED.

LOOKING FOR YOUR ADVICE PLEASE.

THANKING YOU.

Follow Query

Report Abuse

M/s. Y-not legal services (Expert) 22 July 2015
anonymous query can not be answered

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

SUMISION OF DIFFECTIVE SHOW CAUSE

Similar Resolved Queries :