Service matter
shyamal
(Querist) 25 April 2016
This query is : Resolved
Sir,
I was suspended for being detained under custody for more than 48 hours .
In my defence I Wrote
I was detained for more than 48 hours because on 25th January 2016, the ACJM asked to produce the case diary on 02-02-16. Therefore I had no option but to wait till 02-02-16 and when the case diary was produced on 02-02-16, the allegation was proved false. Thus the employee may not be held responsible for more than 48 hours detention in custody. It is the court procedure which was responsible for more than 48 hours detention in custody.
There is a provision in the rule stating
Orders against which appeal lies
“ Interprets to his disadvantage the provisions of any such rule or agreement”
Was my explanation correct
Shyamal
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 28 April 2016
Apparently you have replied that court procedure was the reason and allegation that was leveled, has been proved to be false in court.
So on the face of it should suffice.
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 28 April 2016
You may prey the disciplinary authority to allow you to join and take final decision on conclusion of the court case.
