non - obstante clause.

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 14 April 2011 This query is : Open
Marutiudyog ltd vs. Ramlal (2005) 2 SC 638.
&
In CIT vs. B.R. Constructions (1999) 202 ITR 222 (AP) CFB.
&

SC in Ssouth India Corp Ltd vs. Secretary Borad of Revenue.

Required the hole case in detail pls any one provide me. it explain in depth of
It is not there in indiankoon.com so pls do the needful

The citation gives the non - obstante clause interpretation by the SC in depth.

Thanks.

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now