Raj Kumar Makkad
(Expert) 02 August 2010
If the relevant director for the responsible for the day to day affairs of the company or has signed the bounced cheque then he is duly responsible.
Raj Kumar Makkad
(Expert) 02 August 2010
If the relevant director for the responsible for the day to day affairs of the company or has signed the bounced cheque then he is duly responsible.
Arul Kumar
(Expert) 02 August 2010
Yes, If a director act as a principle officer the company, then he is fully liable for the dishonour of the cheque.
As per the catena of judgement by Supreme Court there has to be a specific averment in the notice/complaint against the director alleging that he/she is responsible for the Company's day to day conduct.
s.subramanian
(Expert) 02 August 2010
i agree with daksh.
DEFENSE ADVOCATE.-firmaction@g
(Expert) 08 August 2010
And only just averment is not sufficient which complainant do in routine , it has to be spcifically shown how the particular director was responsible for the affairs of the accused company.
M/s. Y-not legal services
(Expert) 05 December 2010
Its related upon the circumstances.. The matter has to be cleared that the purpose of the issuance of cheque. And whats the part of the director
Trouble Logging in? Try following the given steps -
1. Visit your inbox to find a confirmation mail from LAWyersClubIndia.
2. Click on the confirmation link and confirm your signup