MAINTAINANCE

M Ravinder Babu Advocate Parka (Querist) 26 February 2010 This query is : Open
Bar u/s 125(3) 2005(2)ald(crl)370(sc) held not applicable-original appication filed with in stipulated period one year subsequent applicationfor arears for subsequent period-do not amountbar of limitation u/s 125(3) crpc.
Act u/s 125 (3) is specific. payment and liabulity are different issues,
WHEN ACT IS SPECIFIC AND NOT AMENDED /ALTERED CAN ACT PREVAILS OR JUDGEMENT PREVAILS.
PLEASE FURNISH ANY CITATIONS THAT ACT PREVAILS

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries

Llb graduate
Crpc 156(3) criminal complaint after e-filing
Regarding heir certificate of deceased woman
Issues on axis bank
Need legal help
Professional hacker
2 child policy in rajasthan
I need legal guidance regarding my bank account freeze.
Guidance on 498a, maintenance, and settlement decision
Gratuity paid after 1 year and 5 months

Request for second opinion in bar council proceedings
Reinforcing rule-based adjudication in proceedings
Awaiting the shrewd advocate's answer.
Pl. check for legal accuracy
Legal notice used for harrasment
Is advocate guilty?
Advocate�s duty to justice apply to the pre-litigation ?
Legal opinion on baseless legal notice and law
Dismissals due to defective legal notices
Legal notice content