MAINTAINANCE

M Ravinder Babu Advocate Parka (Querist) 26 February 2010 This query is : Open
Bar u/s 125(3) 2005(2)ald(crl)370(sc) held not applicable-original appication filed with in stipulated period one year subsequent applicationfor arears for subsequent period-do not amountbar of limitation u/s 125(3) crpc.
Act u/s 125 (3) is specific. payment and liabulity are different issues,
WHEN ACT IS SPECIFIC AND NOT AMENDED /ALTERED CAN ACT PREVAILS OR JUDGEMENT PREVAILS.
PLEASE FURNISH ANY CITATIONS THAT ACT PREVAILS

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries

Shall i remove her name from health insurance policy
Legal advice on gifting of residential flat in mumbai.
Status order stalling promotions
Lottery winner
Lottery winner
Indexation on ltcg on property sale
Protection of mobile call records
Ni act 138 by mistake wrong answer given
Pocso act
Complaint under sc/st act

Forr 16a-tds file delayed
Owner rights if redevlopment not done in apartment
Vacation judge
Legal notice used for harrasment
Settlement
Is advocate guilty?
Advocate�s duty to justice apply to the pre-litigation ?
Legal opinion on baseless legal notice and law
Dismissals due to defective legal notices
Legal notice content