Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More



Advocate. Arunagiri's Expert Profile

Queries Replied : 7539

+ View Full Profile

    What kinds of questions I can and can't answer?
    Property related. Criminal Cases. IPC & NI Act Writ

    My area of expertise
    Property Law, Corporate Law, NI Act, Constitution, Human Rights

    My experience in the area (years):
    16

    Organizations I belong to:
    Advocate, Bar Council of India. Vice Chairman, International Human Rights Association

    Publications or writing which has appeared :
    NIL

    Educational credentials:
    B.Com., BL, Senior management Programmer (IIM-Cal), (CS)

    Award & Honors:
    NIL

  • aftab says : Dobule Registry
    Hello Sir, My friend bought a plot by lady in 2012 and got mutation done, before buying that plot he check the papers and mutation which was on that lady name and she bought that Plot from a farmer, everything was in order. Now he came to know that property was sold to a society in 1991 by the farmer, there after society did plotting on it and sold it out to X parties. Now the X person who bought the same plot in 1991 showed up and claiming on it, although he do not have mutation for the same. Please guide how we start the case taking under consideration that property was bought for 25 lkh and in registry he mention circle rate at the time 10 lkh only. He did consult with lawyers in Lucknow and came to know that old registry which was done in 1991 is stronger and valuable than new one regardless even if he has mutation done. Court will accept old one and might reject new one which is done in 2012. Kind Regards, Aftab Ahmad

  • Ashish Singh says : PLEASE SUGGEST
    Hello Sir , I have been previously helped by lawyers club , i really appriciate the forum . Unwantedly I am again in a situation where i need your suggestions . I applied my brothers visa last month thru a travel agent by making advance payment of Rs 10,000 . Visa was refused and without my prior permission agent kept applying for visa again and again keeping me in dark ( i made them very clear on first refusal that i dont want visa now ) For one month he kept troubling me by false statements , half of the time they dint pick my calls neither they updated me the status .When i visited his office to collect passport he assured me that he wont charge anything and will refund my whole amount as it was his mistake due to which i had to suffer . Till now he have not refunded my amount , neither he is picking my call nor he is replying to my messages . When i visited his office his tone changed telling that u dont need to come here . I will deposite my self . Can i file a case in Consumer court ,what are the chances suing him ? Please suggest the money i gave him are hard earned and i want to teach lesson to such people Regards

  • Manoj says : cheque bounce need help
    Dear Sir. I put a cheque in the bank for 1 lakh rupees but it bounced and the person who i gave the cheque to has told me he will revert back but he is not answering my phone nor is he giving me a date when he will give my money. I went to meet him. But he is not there. The neighbours tell me that he is not at home since a month. His phone also has been switched off since more than 1 and a half month. I know this person and i gave him cash which i had to borrow from others. i don't have any proof only that i got this cheque at the time of giving him cash. He was giving me an interest every month in return. What should i do. I hava a few sms which says, C to rtn capital aft payout so assuming 11/1 also as mid point u can rcv ur principalfunds to b rtned by say 2/2 so will arnge for that. What should i do. Can i send a notice to him. But he is not at home currently and what could the outcome be. Its been 20 days since i got the cheque back from the bank. Should i let him know that i am going to send him a notice for the bounced cheque. What could be the outcome and how much expense would be incurred if i was to send him a notice and file a case against him. He sometimes replies to my mail. This guy doesn't seem to care. Thanks for all your help. Regards, Manoj

  • Pravin says : Daughters role in fathers agricultural land
    Hi all, My query is that my grandfather A had agriculture land of 16 acre.All land on his name only(single owner). He has total 5 children(2 son and 3 daughter).His eldest daughter was died in 1980 only and had nothing from her family alive till date. Now mine grandfather then transferred his entire land on name of his two children A1 and A2 in 1982. He not added his daughters name in 7/12 Utara and all legal stuffs. As my father was eldest in family did lot for entire family done marriages for all his siblings and built up house for entire family and done lot for sister and brothers. My grandfather died in 2005 after 23 yrs (when he had named his children on his property). Now my fathers sisters B1 and B2 want their rights on this property they have not discuss anything on this and send notice from advocate to my father and his brother(uncle). I would like to know if their name was not on any legal document(not on 7/12),so my father has to give any share to them. My father is very calm and silent person so they are making fool to him telling he need to give them share and they tourchering my mother for same she now had 2 seviour attack because of this please advice me for same. I want to help my father. Both their daughter had very bad character image and no one respect them in village.My uncle also taking their side so they will get extra share from sisters. My father solve all lands from landlord which grandfather was kept on hypothecation conditions.please advise on same

  • shivanand says : breif note on PTCL case
    Subject : brif note on PTCL Message : Dear sir, We have purchased 7 acre of land which was granted to one of shivappa kallappa naikmakkal in the year 1966 with a condition of non-alienation of the land for a period of 15 years. The grantee alienated the land during the year 1982 and 1985.which is after completion of 15 year.we is the 3rd purchaser of the land. The grantee filed a case with assistant commissioner dharwad (Karnataka),during the year 2005 stating that he belongs to HINDU VALMIKI caste which has been classified as scheduled tribe community there by lending to violation of clause 4(2) of the PTCL act with contention of resumption of land back to original grantee. The assistant commissioner dharwad heard the case and rejected the petition standing that the caste of the grantee has been classified as scheduled tribe community W.E.F 19/04/1991.the grantee filed and appeal to deputy commissioner dharwad during the year 2006-07 .the D.C dharwd has heard the case and upheld the judgment of AC dharwad. The grantee again preferred an writ petition to the High court of Karnataka during 2009 the court had heard the case and again remanded back to the case to the DC dharwad for hearing and for passing appropriate order. Now the case has been called for hearing by the DC on 25/02/2014. In regards to the judgment issued by the high court single and double bench the following points have been brought to perusal the constitution scheduled tribe order 1950 has been issued as per the provision of article 342 of constitution classifying the community under ST and several amendments have been issued to the presidential notification 1950 by adding caste of person inserted to the ST list w.e.f 19/04/1991 Naik,Nayak,Beda,Bedar &valmiki (constitution 2nd amendment 1991 copy and bill passed by Lok saba copy enclosed ) As states above caste every Amendments to presidential notification of 1950. Thre is a specific Effective date, month & year on which the caste for to be considered as ST. In such circumstances the judgments have been issued by the Honble judges considering the caste added to the ST with Retrospective effect with revert back to the presidential notification 1950. Without considering the effect dates,month,&year of amendments by issue of judgments considering as Retrospective effect of 1950, injustice has been caused to the purchaser of the land there by resumption of purchaser land back to original grantee. In view of the above the necessary classification requires on the following points 1) Whether the constitution scheduled tribe all amendments & modification amendments are Retrospective or prospective? 2) On what bases the judgments have issued considering the constitution amendments to revert back to presidential notification 1950? 3) If the all amendments are Retrospective effect for this any of the notification issued in this regards? Dear sir kindly as soon as possible necessary legal advice on the above the doubts may please I communicated. We are waiting for kind advice Thanking you sir Shivanand m desai 9986980722

Comment Please

  

Other LCI Experts


Rajendra K Goyal
Queries Replied : 53581

Raj Kumar Makkad
Queries Replied : 44370

Devajyoti Barman
Queries Replied : 34799



Course