Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More



Devajyoti Barman's Expert Profile

Queries Replied : 34799

+ View Full Profile

    What kinds of questions I can and can't answer?
    Questions relating to matrimonial disputes, civil litigations, criminal proceedings, consumer disputes, arbitrations etc can be answered by me but not anything relating to taxations.

    My area of expertise
    civil and criminal cases, arbitration, bail,consumer disputes etc.

    My experience in the area (years):
    Nine years of active court pracice from lower court to High Court.

    Organizations I belong to:
    Apart from individualn practice empanelled lawyer of- ahara Housingfina Corpn.,Kolkata Port Trust, Kolkata Metropolital Development Authority Of Water& Sanitation, FOSMI,Several Solicitor Firms.

    Publications or writing which has appeared :
    Nothing

    Educational credentials:
    BA(Hons), MBA, LL.B

    Award & Honors:
    First Class in Madyamik, Higher Secondary and LL.B.

  • sonavnayak says : Section 29 A arbitration application
    I win interim order in arbitration (sec-17), now my arbitrator inform us to file application in Sec 29 A for further proceeding and set aside, what about our win interim order for deposit of interim order(losing party has to deposit fund as per interim order) , why I have to file application in Sec 29-A in arbitration, as losing party contempt the interim order and I already filed Contempt petition

  • {Balu manikantan} SUBRAMANYAM says : Validity of summons received by wife
    Wife received summons which was addressed to the Husband by an arbitrator instead of husband is it valid service of summons.can the petitioner in that case claim that it is a valid service of summons.Please let me know sir Read more at: https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/experts_profile.asp?member_id=38389

  • Sapan Ahlawat says : Statement of Accused
    Respected Member, While framing of charges against the accused in a complaint under section 138 of N.I. Act, the accused has stated that the cheque was stolen but later on after the persual of all the records it comes out that the cheque in question was issued for some transitions between the complainant and the accused. Now the question is that how can the accuse rectify his statement given at the time of framing of charges. Please help. Thanks

  • Aditya Vaish says : concept of "watching counsel" in India.
    Respected sir, Other common law countries have a concept of "watching counsel" or Watching Brief advocacy. The purpose of watching brief is to help protect the rights and interests of victims of a crime. But a watching counsel does not directly take part in the criminal trial and acts as an observer. I wish to know whether there is any legal framework in India providing for this. I would be really grateful to you for your help. Regards Aditya Vaish

  • Mustafa Bhat says : 498A & 406 Written arguments
    Sir, In my 498A & 406 case oral arguments was done, after oral arguments both counsels requested for written arguments which was allowed by Court, Now the prosecution is saying that they will submit the written arguments one or two days after the defense will submit their written arguments and after providing a copy of defense arguments to prosecution. Can any one please guide me what is law on it. Is persecution correct.. Any Law / Judgement plz.

Comment Please

  

Other LCI Experts


Rajendra K Goyal
Queries Replied : 53581

Raj Kumar Makkad
Queries Replied : 44370

ajay sethi
Queries Replied : 31529