Moot Court Cases (The Sale of goods act)
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 27 February 2011
This query is : Resolved
The plaintiff filed suit against the shopkeeper and the company who manufacture TV on the ground that the TV supplied by the shopkeeper has some defect and not giving performance as claimed by the company all such defects have occurred during the period of one year from the date of purchase or within the period of its guarantee & the plaintiff prayed to the Hon'ble Court either to refund the price of TV along with interest thereon from the date of the purpose or in alternative, replacement of a TV of the same make.
it is the case of the defendant No 1 that whenever he received the complaint in respect of the TV the experts have attended all such complaints within the period of guarantee and the last complaint made by the plaintiff is after expiry period of the guarantee and therefore the defendant no 1 is not bound to either refund the amount of TV or to replace with a new TV of the same make.
it is the case of the defendant no 2 that the defendant no 1 never referred the complaint of the plaintiff to them and therefore it is the liability of the defendant no 1 in the event of the decree in the matter.
I need some facts of arguments for Moot Court Exam in Collage which is on 4th March 2011 please guide me on this
In this case we have to choose the party for argue plz suggest
