Property issue
Punit
(Querist) 02 May 2014
This query is : Resolved
Sir,
As i m defendant No-2 in case..case tell that defendant no-1 taken token money for flat from plantiff and after that plantiff did not take the flat and defendant no-1 sold flat to me(defendnt no-2) and i m havin all papers done registry etc later aftr 1 year i recieved notice to appear in court as i have purchased the flat. now case already yrs done and now in lok adalat where plantif not able to show evidence and take next date again and again and now court issue "order last and final opportunity is given to plantiff to lead evidence". what you think is further things ll take place..? and around 4 visit done in lok adalat already..plantiff said he had taken status que for falt and defendent sold it aftr knowing that..but he not able to show evidence of status que(plantif)..and court give next date again and again...i m defendent no-2 in this..whr procedings ll go..? in meanwhile case also go to meditiation but no result done earlier lok adalat.
Thanks sir.
ajay sethi
(Expert) 02 May 2014
1) if flat was sold by 1st defendants to you in contravention of court orders for maintenance of staus quo then it would amount to contempt of court . plaintiff has to prove the order passed by court in this regard
2) if token money had been taken by 1st defendant from plaintiff then flat could not have been sold to you unless agreement between plaintiff and 1st defendant was cancelled
Punit
(Querist) 02 May 2014
sir,
plantiff not able to prove status que receipt as defendent know it . and not able to prove that he received d status que ordr.
but sir i m defendent no-2 registry on my name..does plantif able to get flat again.bcz only rs 40000 was taken by defendent by plantif.
i unnecesary appear for date with fault of them. where u think case heading..?
if he not able to prove then.?
Punit
(Querist) 02 May 2014
sir,
As i m owner of flat now and registry on my name. do plantif ll get flat any chance bcz i have purchased it. and if he not able to prove evidence then what defendent no 1 has to pay to plantif..? in case he proved or not proved..? and how i ll get relief from all this.
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 02 May 2014
If no status quo was granted and the agreement to sale was cancelled between plaintiff and def. 1,nothing to worry.
Punit
(Querist) 02 May 2014
sir,
if status quo was not granted and not proved by plantif and agreement of tokem money was their then what ll happen to defendent no-1 as mistake was of him.
what things further ll take place..?
