(Querist) 26 September 2009
This query is : Resolved
1)There is an establish practice in muslim law that husband by pronouncing talaq gives diverse to his wife. If a muslim lady/wife wants to give diverse to her husband, whether the personal law permits? what should be the procedure? How provisions of 'Khulla' will be applicable. 2) If a wife of muslim without diverse, wants to convert herself to hindusm whether she can convert herself? 3) By desertion if muslim lady resides away from her husband along with her three minor childrens, whether religion of the minor childeres can be changed only at the instance of mother / without consent of her husband? please guide. Thanks
adv. rajeev ( rajoo )
(Expert) 26 September 2009
A divorce by Khula is a divorce with the consent, and at the instance of the wife, in which she give or agrees to give a consideration to the husand for her release from the marriagetie. In such a case the terms of the bargain are a matter of arrangment between the husband and wife, and the wife may as the consideratin, release her dyn-mahn and other rights, or make any other agreement for the benefit of the husband. Mubara is mutual release. Court has no jurisidctin or power to order a husband to enter into Khula. IT is within the discretion of the husaband to accept the proposal of his wife or not. 2. If she converts to Hinusim it is good ground for the divorce. 3
Sarvesh Kumar Sharma Advocate
(Expert) 26 September 2009
Divorce by muslim wife: The divorce by wife can be categorized under three categories: (i) Talaaq-i-tafweez (ii) Lian (iii) By Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act 1939.
Talaaq-i-tafweez or delegated divorce is recognized among both, the Shias and the Sunnis. The Muslim husband is free to delegate his power of pronouncing divorce to his wife or any other person. He may delegate the power absolutely or conditionally, temporarily or permanently . A permanent delegation of power is revocable but a temporary delegation of power is not. This delegation must be made distinctly in favour of the person to whom the power is delegated, and the purpose of delegation must be clearly stated. The power of talaaq may be delegated to his wife and as Faizee observes, â€œthis form of delegated divorce is perhaps the most potent weapon in the hands of a Muslim wife to obtain freedom without the intervention of any court and is now beginning to be fairly common in Indiaâ€. This form of delegated divorce is usually stipulated in prenuptial agreements. In Md. Khan v. Shahmai , under a prenuptial agreement, a husband, who was a Khana Damad, undertook to pay certain amount of marriage expenses incurred by the father-in-law in the event of his leaving the house and conferred a power to pronounce divorce on his wife. The husband left his father-in-lawâ€™s house without paying the amount. The wife exercised the right and divorced herself. It was held that it was a valid divorce in the exercise of the power delegated to her. Delegation of power may be made even in the post marriage agreements. Thus where under an agreement it is stipulated that in the event of the husband failing to pay her maintenance or taking a second wife, the will have a right of pronouncing divorce on herself, such an agreement is valid, and such conditions are reasonable and not against public policy . It should be noted that even in the event of contingency, whether or not the power is to be exercised, depend upon the wife she may choose to exercise it or she may not. The happening of the event of contingency does not result in automatic divorce.
Lian: If the husband levels false charges of unchastity or adultery against his wife then this amounts to character assassination and the wife has got the right to ask for divorce on these grounds. Such a mode of divorce is called Lian. However, it is only a voluntary and aggressive charge of adultery made by the husband which, if false, would entitle the wife to get the wife to get the decree of divorce on the ground of Lian. Where a wife hurts the feelings of her husband with her behaviour and the husband hits back an allegation of infidelity against her, then what the husband says in response to the bad behaviour of the wife, cannot be used by the wife as a false charge of adultery and no divorce is to be granted under Lian. This was held in the case of Nurjahan v. Kazim Ali by the Calcutta High Court.
Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act 1939: Qazi Mohammad Ahmad Kazmi had introduced a bill in the Legislature regarding the issue on 17th April 1936. It however became law on 17th March 1939 and thus stood the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act 1939.
Section 2 of the Act runs thereunder:
A woman married under Muslim law shall be entitled to obtain a decree for divorce for the dissolution of her marriage on any one or more of the following grounds, namely:- â€¢ That the whereabouts of the husband have not been known for a period of four years: if the husband is missing for a period of four years the wife may file a petition for the dissolution of her marriage. The husband is deemed to be missing if the wife or any such person, who is expected to have knowledge of the husband, is unable to locate the husband. Section 3 provides that where a wife files petition for divorce under this ground, she is required to give the names and addresses of all such persons who would have been the legal heirs of the husband upon his death. The court issues notices to all such persons appear before it and to state if they have any knowledge about the missing husband. If nobody knows then the court passes a decree to this effect which becomes effective only after the expiry of six months. If before the expiry, the husband reappears, the court shall set aside the decree and the marriage is not dissolved.
â€¢ That the husband has neglected or has failed to provide for her maintenance for a period of two years: it is a legal obligation of every husband to maintain his wife, and if he fails to do so, the wife may seek divorce on this ground. A husband may not maintain his wife either because he neglects her or because he has no means to provide her maintenance. In both the cases the result would be the same. The husbandâ€™s obligation to maintain his wife is subject to wifeâ€™s own performance of matrimonial obligations. Therefore, if the wife lives separately without any reasonable excuse, she is not entitled to get a judicial divorce on the ground of husbandâ€™s failure to maintain her because her own conduct disentitles her from maintenance under Muslim law.
â€¢ That the husband has been sentenced to imprisonment for a period of seven years or upwards: the wifeâ€™s right of judicial divorce on this ground begins from the date on which the sentence becomes final. Therefore, the decree can be passed in her favour only after the expiry of the date for appeal by the husband or after the appeal by the husband has been dismissed by the final court.
â€¢ That the husband has failed to perform, without reasonable cause, his marital obligations for a period of three years: the Act does define â€˜marital obligations of the husbandâ€™. There are several marital obligations of the husband under Muslim law. But for the purpose of this clause husbandâ€™s failure to perform only those conjugal obligations may be taken into account which are not included in any of the clauses of Section 2 of this Act.
â€¢ That the husband was impotent at the time of the marriage and continues to be so: for getting a decree of divorce on this ground, the wife has to prove that the husband was impotent at the time of the marriage and continues to be impotent till the filing of the suit. Before passing a decree of divorce of divorce on this ground, the court is bound to give to the husband one year to improve his potency provided he makes an application for it. If the husband does not give such application, the court shall pass the decree without delay. In Gul Mohd. Khan v. Hasina the wife filed a suit for dissolution of marriage on the ground of impotency. The husband made an application before the court seeking an order for proving his potency. The court allowed him to prove his potency.
â€¢ If the husband has been insane for a period of two years or is suffering from leprosy or a virulent veneral disease: the husbandâ€™s insanity must be for two or more years immediately preceding the presentation of the suit. But this act does not specify that the unsoundness of mind must be curable or incurable. Leprosy may be white or black or cause the skin to wither away. It may be curable or incurable. Veneral disease is a disease of the sex organs. The Act provides that this disease must be of incurable nature. It may be of any duration. Moreover even if this disease has been infected to the husband by the wife herself, she is entitled to get divorce on this ground.
â€¢ That she, having been given in marriage by her father or other guardian before she attained the age of fifteen years, repudiated the marriage before attaining the age of eighteen years, provided that the marriage has not been consummated;
â€¢ That the husband treats her with cruelty, that is to say,- (a) Habitually assaults her or makes her life miserable by cruelty of conduct even if such conduct does not amount to physical illtreatment, or (b) Associates with women of ill-repute or leads an infamous life, or (c
Raj Kumar Makkad
(Expert) 26 September 2009
Sarvesh Ji has done a marvelous job by defining in detail all relevant aspects of the matter. I have also learnt various new things. thanx.
(Expert) 28 September 2009
thanks Sarvesh Sharma