Arun
18 July 2015 at 12:02
We are an SSI unit registered with DIC since 1992.
Filed a case of delayed payment last year for a project executed by us in 2005.
Proceedings completed with the Arbitrator passing an order in our favour but allowed interest only from the date of filing and not from the 2005.
The opposite party has approached the district court to set aside the award claiming that the Act cannot apply retrospectively.
That's only a brief ides about the case.
Need expert advise on the matter.
prasad
17 July 2015 at 14:59
a decree holder brought the immovable property of the JDR for auction through EP proceedings, and with permission, the DHR also participated in the auction, he declared highest bidder, and deposited sale amount into court,SALE WAS NOT CONFIRMED, at this stage claim petition was filed by third party, during the pendency, all the parties compromised. now the decree holder can take back the amount deposited into the court. if yes I NEED A CITATION
s.ravikumar
17 July 2015 at 11:21
sir,
I APPLIED FOR PASSPORT AND I AM STAYING HERE FOR MORE THAN 8 YEARS IN SRIKAKULAM (A.P).THE POLICE PERSON WROTE ADVERSE REPORT THAT I AM STAYING WITH MY PARENTS AT DIFFERENT PLACE (ie Bilaspur C.G).I DIDN'T HAVE ANY ADDRESS PROOF AT BILASPUR. I APPLIED FOR REVERIFICATION AGAIN HE WROTE LIKE THAT. WHAT CAN I DO, IS THIS THE WAY TO WRITE WRONG REPORT.
WHAT CAN I DO WRITE NOW THE PASSPORT OFFICER WANTS THE CLEAR REPORT , ONE REPORT HAS SENT THAT CANT BE CHANGED.
I DIDNT HAVE ANY ADDRESS PROOF AT MY PARENTS ADDRESS.
I AM AT SEA.
RAVIKUMAR SUNKARA
9491815902
sridhar pasumarthy
17 July 2015 at 08:28
Respect Experts,
A suit was filed by a tenant against wife of the owner of leased property seeking permanent injunction to restrain her from dispossession during subsistence of lease. Plaintiff filed the suit under a misconception that wife is the original owner. Now after knowing that husband is the owner of property, plaintiff filed an application under order 1 rule 10 CPC seeking to imp lead the husband/real owner as 2nd defendant alleging that he has been often visiting the leased premises and threatening the plaintiff to dispossess him forcibly.
My queries are :-
1. Whether plaintiff is entitled to implead a party as new defendant on the basis of subsequent cause of action pending the suit? OR
2. Should the plaintiff file a separate suit against the husband?
Pls answer my queries.
monty lamba
16 July 2015 at 16:26
Dear Sir,
i was filed one case suit for declaration,possession and permanent injunction, one person make a party in court filed U/o 1 Rule 10 cpc application with fake & fabricated documents.
court not deceased a party in civil suit
for applicant argument in pending.
a) i filed against applicant criminal case u/s 156(3) Crpc.for produce fake & fabricated documents in civil suit.
b) applicant refiled civil suit against me suit for declaration,possession and permanent injunction,
same fake & fabricated documents in same civil court.
sir please share your valuable comments
civil court allow to dismissed applicant
u/o 1 Rule 10 application.
anilkumar yadav
16 July 2015 at 12:34
an area has not been urbanised u/s 507 of DMC, for revenue purposes Punjab Land Revenue Act 1883 applies. Now for the construction of houses MCD is passing building plan only for the property which are on-road. Not for the other properties which are in the street.
Why so?
As far as I know Delhi Land Reform Act and Punjab Land Revenue Act does not applies to urban areas.
Correct me if I am wrong and kindly advice.
ketan
14 July 2015 at 15:25
We have a piece of land (Devasthan inam) at dapoli dist. my grandfather had given this land on lease to a person, he died after this his wife's name came to 7/12 in column iter hakk. After her death her daughter's name are written on 7/12. I heard that these entries are illegal because land is devasthan inam and 32G is not applicable to this land I want remove these name from 7/12 Please advise
B SHANKAR LAL
14 July 2015 at 11:57
I AM A GOVT EMPLOYEE AND TDS IS BEING DONE BY MY OFFICE AND FORM 16 IS BEING ISSUED. PRESENTLY I AM IN 10% TAX BRACKET. MY QUESTION PERTAINS TO SALE OF MY HOUSE. I AM PROPOSING TO SELL MY HOUSE FOR RS. 10 LAKHS. THIS HOUSE WAS PURCHASED FOR RS. 6 LAKHS IN 2010 AND NOW I AM SELLING IT FOR RS. 10 LAKHS IN 2015. I WANT TO KNOW THE FOLLOWING.
1) CAN I DEPOSIT THE CASH WHICH I RECEIVED IN MY SB ACCOUNT
2) WILL I HAVE TO PAY INCOME TAX FOR THE 10 LAKHS
3) I INTEND TO PUT THIS AMOUNT AS FIXED DEPOSIT IN THE NAME OF MY TWO CHILDREN. WILL IT BE POSSIBLE
PLEASE GUIDE ME ON THE CORRECT PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOWED. THANKS...
urmish udani
14 July 2015 at 09:51
Facts ...I am owner of 224 Hector of land..since 2003 mutation in my name..there were proceedings against my predecessor in title in 1976..revision in 1979 by govt under this act..was dropped clearly observing that the land is OSAD and does not fall in the defination of agricultural land at all..the land is falling in the notified area under section 113A of MRTP act..and required for CIDCO for township. .while mutating in 2003 circle officer observed that land is submerged in sea water and also falls in industrial zone hence can't be treated agricultural land..in acquition process in 2004 the land n survey officer observed the land is full of mud hence they could not even put survey table on the entire land..however the acquition was not complete and hence was laps as per new land acquitionact. .now suddenly SDO issues notice under ceiling act..to show why the land should not be declared as a surplus land..pls advise whether in the light of this the land can come in the ambit of ceiling act? ?whether is it open for SDO to issue such notice?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Bombay public trust act 1950
We are having trust hospital. We have given it on third party to run on O&M basis. Party gives is 3% profit sharing yearly basis. In this case amount to be deposited in IPF account for treatment of Indigent & weaker section under BPT act 1950 Clause 41AA shall be Gross receipt of third party OR 3% profit which trust is getting as a gross receipt from Third party. Please clarify this.