shyam
19 July 2015 at 13:52
Sir,
My father purchased a 6 marla property 10 year ago from a party.registry is OK Location of property is mentioned in registry. But due to mistake of patwari at that time in intqaal it shows our property as only a part of 3 hactare total property of selling party without mentioning its location.now at present value of our 6 marla is much more as compare of remaining.so selling party claiming that they sold 6 marla land at somewhere else (not there ,where at present we constructed house and shops) and they filing case in court.mistake was from government side.we were not aware of all these at that time....
Please suggest some solution...what to do now
Thank u
abhay
19 July 2015 at 12:55
If mortgage deed is for bank loan is registered in maharashtra after paying stamp duty of maharashtra but this d�ed also includes property of chhatisgarh. SRO offflice sent memo with d�ed to SRO chhatisgsrh.SRO chhaishgarh sent the doc. to collector stamp. Nayalaya collector of stamp at chhatisgarh issued notice to appear before him with origional deed. What is to be done by us. what is duty in chhatosgarh o n mortgage deed for bank loan.loan amt.is 50 cr.Please advise.
Parag Udas
18 July 2015 at 17:34
We are having trust hospital. We have given it on third party to run on O&M basis. Party gives is 3% profit sharing yearly basis. In this case amount to be deposited in IPF account for treatment of Indigent & weaker section under BPT act 1950 Clause 41AA shall be Gross receipt of third party OR 3% profit which trust is getting as a gross receipt from Third party. Please clarify this.
Arun
18 July 2015 at 12:02
We are an SSI unit registered with DIC since 1992.
Filed a case of delayed payment last year for a project executed by us in 2005.
Proceedings completed with the Arbitrator passing an order in our favour but allowed interest only from the date of filing and not from the 2005.
The opposite party has approached the district court to set aside the award claiming that the Act cannot apply retrospectively.
That's only a brief ides about the case.
Need expert advise on the matter.
prasad
17 July 2015 at 14:59
a decree holder brought the immovable property of the JDR for auction through EP proceedings, and with permission, the DHR also participated in the auction, he declared highest bidder, and deposited sale amount into court,SALE WAS NOT CONFIRMED, at this stage claim petition was filed by third party, during the pendency, all the parties compromised. now the decree holder can take back the amount deposited into the court. if yes I NEED A CITATION
s.ravikumar
17 July 2015 at 11:21
sir,
I APPLIED FOR PASSPORT AND I AM STAYING HERE FOR MORE THAN 8 YEARS IN SRIKAKULAM (A.P).THE POLICE PERSON WROTE ADVERSE REPORT THAT I AM STAYING WITH MY PARENTS AT DIFFERENT PLACE (ie Bilaspur C.G).I DIDN'T HAVE ANY ADDRESS PROOF AT BILASPUR. I APPLIED FOR REVERIFICATION AGAIN HE WROTE LIKE THAT. WHAT CAN I DO, IS THIS THE WAY TO WRITE WRONG REPORT.
WHAT CAN I DO WRITE NOW THE PASSPORT OFFICER WANTS THE CLEAR REPORT , ONE REPORT HAS SENT THAT CANT BE CHANGED.
I DIDNT HAVE ANY ADDRESS PROOF AT MY PARENTS ADDRESS.
I AM AT SEA.
RAVIKUMAR SUNKARA
9491815902
sridhar pasumarthy
17 July 2015 at 08:28
Respect Experts,
A suit was filed by a tenant against wife of the owner of leased property seeking permanent injunction to restrain her from dispossession during subsistence of lease. Plaintiff filed the suit under a misconception that wife is the original owner. Now after knowing that husband is the owner of property, plaintiff filed an application under order 1 rule 10 CPC seeking to imp lead the husband/real owner as 2nd defendant alleging that he has been often visiting the leased premises and threatening the plaintiff to dispossess him forcibly.
My queries are :-
1. Whether plaintiff is entitled to implead a party as new defendant on the basis of subsequent cause of action pending the suit? OR
2. Should the plaintiff file a separate suit against the husband?
Pls answer my queries.
monty lamba
16 July 2015 at 16:26
Dear Sir,
i was filed one case suit for declaration,possession and permanent injunction, one person make a party in court filed U/o 1 Rule 10 cpc application with fake & fabricated documents.
court not deceased a party in civil suit
for applicant argument in pending.
a) i filed against applicant criminal case u/s 156(3) Crpc.for produce fake & fabricated documents in civil suit.
b) applicant refiled civil suit against me suit for declaration,possession and permanent injunction,
same fake & fabricated documents in same civil court.
sir please share your valuable comments
civil court allow to dismissed applicant
u/o 1 Rule 10 application.
anilkumar yadav
16 July 2015 at 12:34
an area has not been urbanised u/s 507 of DMC, for revenue purposes Punjab Land Revenue Act 1883 applies. Now for the construction of houses MCD is passing building plan only for the property which are on-road. Not for the other properties which are in the street.
Why so?
As far as I know Delhi Land Reform Act and Punjab Land Revenue Act does not applies to urban areas.
Correct me if I am wrong and kindly advice.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Non compliance of s. 63 (1) a of bombay tenancy act
Hello to my senior practitioners, please provide any information when a non agriculturist purchases an agricultural land taking benefits of S.63(1) A of Bombay tenancy act ( in Maharashtra), whereas he is not willing to use the said land for the purpose as prescribed by this section and now wants to sale it further. Can he sale that land further by the virtue of any provisions of law? is there any authority on this subject? I want to help my client on this topic.