syedsaa
17 August 2015 at 08:10
Dear Sir,
I have my aunts passport issued based on Voterid card which was incorrect and added affidavit shows she is illiterate 5 years ago. She has not traveled abroad yet.
Later on realized that the actual dob is on ration card and even on adhaar card is correct. she would like to visit her daughters abroad where they mentioned the dob based on ration card.
Which shows 5 years difference. they cannot call her due to wrong dob mentioned in their file while going abroad or US.
What is the solution please advise?
procedure/duration/expenses
On the passport website it shows court order required.
She resides in hyd.
syedsaa
Yogesh
16 August 2015 at 15:35
F. I. R was registered against accused under sec 324 of I. P.c but their is serious injury to victim like 326 of I. P. C
Can magistrate having power to give directions to police add sec 326 of I. P.c under sec 156(3)of crpc
K venkataramana
16 August 2015 at 09:46
My grand father buy at1982 after my grand father died at 1994 after that his wife gave thisland to her brother for lease now they are clutivating this land i am asked this land give back to me but they attack on me i got head injury with 5 striches now guied me how to get this land .
RAJU
16 August 2015 at 06:42
HIgh Court directed collector to pass order on the orders of TAshsildhar whereas collector issued a Memo without adjudication. One of the respondant filed affidavit before collector to pass order as there is misrepresentation and fraud.Collector reopened the ROR case but revision petitioner filed WP and got 6 weeks stay before admission of the case. 6 weeks stay period expired 3 years back. Can collector proceed with ROR Case as stay period is not extended and also case is based on misrepresented, With out having property to Revision petitioner. Please clarify
K.S.Srinivas
14 August 2015 at 23:57
what is the procedure for changing educational credentials on the LCI site.
Grisham
14 August 2015 at 23:22
Hi,
We had a acre of land in the ancestral village. Which was the property of my grandfather(mother side). In 1960 he gave a settlement to my grandmother's name. In 2006, my grandmother executed a will and a settlement in my mother's name. She died in 2007. In 2009 my mother gave a settlement in my father's name. in 2014,my father made grave mistake of participating in a registration of 50 cents to a friend who promised to provide 15 lakhs after 10 days of registration. my father executed a pro note(mother's name) that he owes this much money and he will give the money at least before 3 months to be settled to my mother. now after 9 months he is absconding without any reply.We approached land grabbing cell but they clarified that there was no mention of money to be settled for the land. It is mentioned as a debt.Please guide me in the legal course for this dispute.
-Thanks,
Gokul
deepa
14 August 2015 at 19:21
good evening sir,
i am secretary of my society ,i filed deemed conveyance application of my society on line ,3 hearing pass on,but sir in my case builder and landlord is not support and with the help of society members we form society in NON CO OPERATION WITH BUILDER,AFTER 10 YEARS ,my building has 12 floor B wing & 3 flat in A wing situated in 3rd floor in tenanted building ,my query is whether my conveyance is possible or not ,if not than part conveyance is possible or not ,
landlord submission copy with DDR recd by me ,in that they stat that i write wrong area ,secondly says that his tenancy right is still there in wing A than his advocate says that no question of deemed conveyance arise ,thirdly landlord & builder dispute is still going on from 2006 ,now matter goes in arbitrate ,landlord says that when my dispute with builder solve than they will convey land to my society
& builder says that my FSI is pending & development right is with me ,when tenanted building redevelopment work complete than he will convey the land ,
now in my case what will be the chance ,whether DDR will reject application or not
out of 3 landlord one of landlord,his agreement is still not registered as well as not pay stamp duty because of dispute starts than only his advocate was serve me 4 times notice ,saying that my landlord is landowner as per development agreement his right to become members,is it true or not,sale deed or stamp duty payment not require
please guide me sir
MSC Shekar
14 August 2015 at 16:49
In a Suit consisting a Plaintiff private party and two Govt Departments as respondents. One of the Govt Dept chose to be Ex Parte and accordingly was set exparte.
In a call for records / documents petition involving the Exparte Govt. Dept. The petition was allowed by the Court and the Respondents did not file counter.
Now after the warrant for call for records is issued they say that the said information is not available.
Moreover the Judge/Presiding officer was transferred to another court and the New Judge / Presiding Officer could not understand a single thing. This new Judge says he wants to give a hearing to this again. What does this mean?
A petition that has already been allowed by the court how it can be heard again that to with a Defendant that chose to be exparte?
Is the action of Govt Dept correct in denying information without filing a counter?
Please Justify the action of the Presiding Officer and the Govt Dept.
Thanks in advance.
Bhika Reghiwale
14 August 2015 at 16:24
A
Sir.
    I purchased a plot in Akola from landlord ( S) .previously to sale agreement, Land lord's relative filed sivil suit for their claim. It's wone by land lord (S) on the basis of resjudicata rules. There is no stay up till now.Again landlord's relative gone in appeal. Is there any problem for me?.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Can applicant who has filed an application u/s 156(3) be made party
Dear Sir,
I had filed an application u/s 156(3) against 5 persons. CJM considered the same and case filed u/s 302 of IPC. But police filed an FR and closed the case. Later, CJM also accepted the FR. Now I have applied to reconsider it in the DJ court . But now the opposite party filed an application before the DJ to make us(complainant) a party in this case also. Is there any judgement which clearly says that complainant can not be made party. Please share the same, if possible.
Thanks,
Mahi Juyal